Jacob wrote:

wot

iMercurial wrote:

Jacob wrote:

wot

This need a 2nd bubble to be on Pending, I guess.

1. Seems ok.

1. 00:13:889 (x) - How about adding a note here? I know that's quite difficult because of your current arrangement but a note here sounds much better.Well, leaves this to you.
2. 00:28:639 (3,4,5,6,7) - The spacing of this 5-plets is inconsistent.Were you make it intentionally? Just use distance snap to arrange it again if not.
3. 00:38:014 (1) - I would put a new combo here because this chain of combo is much longer than others.I would like to consistent the length of combos.
4. 01:04:139 (5,6,7,8,9,10,11,1) - Are finish hitsounds fit the music here? I don't think so.It sounds very nosiy in my ears and make me feel headache.I would remove some of them.NOT ALL OF THEM and it will be more reasonable to place that.
5. 02:03:986 (3) - A soft default finish hitsound sounds much better at the beginning of the slider.
6. 02:05:986 (1) - ^Same.
7. 02:06:986 ~ 02:09:486 - ^etc.
8. 02:41:980 (6) - New combo here.The reason same as 00:38:014.
9. 02:56:480 (2,3,4,5,6,7) - This rhythmic pattern sounds weird to me.2-4 plet doesn't fit the music here becuase there is a accent on red tick (02:56:730 - ) and you just ignore that place.......I would suggest moving 02:56:605 (3) - to 02:56:730 - and then adjust the spacing and hitsounds.

kanpakyin wrote:

Random bubble check.


[General]

1. Seems ok.

[Sweetboxer]

1. 00:13:889 (x) - How about adding a note here? I know that's quite difficult because of your current arrangement but a note here sounds much better.Well, leaves this to you. 抱歉我不想改這個 因為聲音太小了 我覺得沒加比加了好
2. 00:28:639 (3,4,5,6,7) - The spacing of this 5-plets is inconsistent.Were you make it intentionally? Just use distance snap to arrange it again if not. 這是我蓄意的沒錯
3. 00:38:014 (1) - I would put a new combo here because this chain of combo is much longer than others.I would like to consistent the length of combos. k
4. 01:04:139 (5,6,7,8,9,10,11,1) - Are finish hitsounds fit the music here? I don't think so.It sounds very nosiy in my ears and make me feel headache.I would remove some of them.NOT ALL OF THEM and it will be more reasonable to place that. k
5. 02:03:986 (3) - A soft default finish hitsound sounds much better at the beginning of the slider. k
6. 02:05:986 (1) - ^Same. k
7. 02:06:986 ~ 02:09:486 - ^etc. k
8. 02:41:980 (6) - New combo here.The reason same as 00:38:014. k
9. 02:56:480 (2,3,4,5,6,7) - This rhythmic pattern sounds weird to me.2-4 plet doesn't fit the music here becuase there is a accent on red tick (02:56:730 - ) and you just ignore that place.......I would suggest moving 02:56:605 (3) - to 02:56:730 - and then adjust the spacing and hitsounds. IRC解決

oh well.

SapphireGhost wrote:

Not approving for six months Look, I'm modding it anyway!

[Sweetboxer]
- Nice simple storyboarding and use of colour.
00:19:139 (5) - Justice Breaker got unranked for this type of slider. Since it's the only one in the map I'd advise you make the path more clear. fixed
00:47:014 (1,2) - I don't think anti-jump is necessary here, more normal spacing is fine and intuitive. ok~let it stack
01:03:889 (3,4,5) - This type of stream is sort of odd to play... change
03:31:730 (8,1) - Spacing is arguably too far. fixed
03:43:980 - Remove the break here since the next one is so close. removed
04:30:730 (2) - Not as bad as the other one, but the path could still be clearer. Umm... let it used straight slider~

Just let me know when you've made changes.

1. I'd tag "Sele-P" as well.

1. 00:15:139 (1) - Remove the new combo since it's very obvious this spinner is a continuation of the previous pattern, based on the time it starts in relation to the last object.
2. 03:46:730 (1) - Looks very obvious that it was placed right with the x or y-axis and a rotation was made. Could be made more round with the addition of more nodes; with an arc that you want to cover like that you're better off using 6 or 7 nodes instead of just 5. In addition, new combo is not necessary, since it belongs to the same phrase, and the sv change can be inferred by the slider ticks.
3. 04:28:855 (7) - What's the anchor mapping the music to? If nothing, then move the anchor to a place in time where it would match the music. Otherwise, sliders like this generally feel better if they were more balanced. Try placing the node between the anchor and the end point at x:330 y:305.
4. 04:49:980 (1) - Spinner ends at a time that doesn't match vocals. It'd be much better if it ended at 04:51:355 - or 04:51:980 - .

those wrote:

[General]

1. I'd tag "Sele-P" as well. Have you checked the artist in NicoNico? It's SeleP not Sele-P. Have checked this please. see: SeleP Sele-P

[Sweetboxer]

1. 00:15:139 (1) - Remove the new combo since it's very obvious this spinner is a continuation of the previous pattern, based on the time it starts in relation to the last object. no. the spinner should need add NC. the spinner represents a transition while the previous notes does not, therefore NC is needed here. moreover, the spinner represents the section before the accent at 00:16:014 - particulatly the sound at 00:15:389 - and these are unrelated to the last combo, so I'll keep NC here.
2. 03:46:730 (1) - Looks very obvious that it was placed right with the x or y-axis and a rotation was made. Could be made more round with the addition of more nodes; with an arc that you want to cover like that you're better off using 6 or 7 nodes instead of just 5. In addition, new combo is not necessary, since it belongs to the same phrase, and the sv change can be inferred by the slider ticks. The slider is not necessarily a sector, and whether the slider looks good is quite subjective and I think this is good enough, so no.
3. 04:28:855 (7) - What's the anchor mapping the music to? If nothing, then move the anchor to a place in time where it would match the music. Otherwise, sliders like this generally feel better if they were more balanced. Try placing the node between the anchor and the end point at x:330 y:305. It's just a slider shape.
4. 04:49:980 (1) - Spinner ends at a time that doesn't match vocals. It'd be much better if it ended at 04:51:355 - or 04:51:980 - . k

SapphireGhost wrote:

Merry Christmas! Er...

SonicX246831 wrote:

rank this shit. dling this beatmap

Kurokami wrote:

SonicX246831 wrote:

rank this shit. dling this beatmap

It's already ranked and this isn't shit.