Add a commenting feature, anyway, the now-system problem is linked to the fact the only used votes are 1-2-3-9-10, and the fact it do not help that much mappers knowing what they did wrong.
The Like/Dislike function could have been misused. The weightening, anyway, should be more like
95-100 % - Like, No weight
90-95 % - Like, 33% weight
80-90 % - Like, 66% weight
70-80 % - Like, 100% weight
50-70 % - Like, 120% weight
30-50 % - Like, 100% weight
15-30 % - Like, 66% weight
5-15 - Like, 33% weight
0-5 % - Like, 0% weight
Why? people who like about 50-70% of the things they play seems more normal actually than around 40-60 % and fair voters are actually under a more large group (30-85%). Too with people that thumbed up/down a really low numbers of map, at least 25 thumbs required to make the weightening of their votes active would be fair.
Even if the actually weightening could have counted with that system so far. an users giving 10 and/or 1 everytime could weight less than someone that gave a larger spread of votes (so weightening based on spread)
The Like/Dislike function could have been misused. The weightening, anyway, should be more like
95-100 % - Like, No weight
90-95 % - Like, 33% weight
80-90 % - Like, 66% weight
70-80 % - Like, 100% weight
50-70 % - Like, 120% weight
30-50 % - Like, 100% weight
15-30 % - Like, 66% weight
5-15 - Like, 33% weight
0-5 % - Like, 0% weight
Why? people who like about 50-70% of the things they play seems more normal actually than around 40-60 % and fair voters are actually under a more large group (30-85%). Too with people that thumbed up/down a really low numbers of map, at least 25 thumbs required to make the weightening of their votes active would be fair.
Even if the actually weightening could have counted with that system so far. an users giving 10 and/or 1 everytime could weight less than someone that gave a larger spread of votes (so weightening based on spread)