Do you mean Mashley knows about helping Mafia or not? If so, why?Dafydd wrote:
If Mashley were town, he would still be helping Mafia anyway.
I wish you'd post useful stuff alreadyLunaticMara wrote:
Okay, I'll be writing some stuff in here while I'm at work. I'm pretty busy around here.
I just realized that Sync and dkun are in this game. This makes me puke so much that the whole floor looks like shit. It also gave me a boner.
Who is this Dafydd guy? Some dude with AIDS? Damn nigga, you just went full SHAZBOT.Do you mean Mashley knows about helping Mafia or not? If so, why?Dafydd wrote:
If Mashley were town, he would still be helping Mafia anyway.
I got nothing else to mention at the moment, really. I like turtles.
I can't, I must suck more dicks.JInxyjem wrote:
I wish you'd post useful stuff already
Actually this got me thinking.Ivalset wrote:
I think all three of them are idiots, but I'm infinitely more suspicious of bmin/sync for throwing that information out there so quickly.
This particular part, yeah.Salvage wrote:
are u gonna ignore me rantai
eat poop nigga :NoHItter wrote:
@LunaticMara
If you are town and don't have anything productive to say, then might as well shut up rather than continue posting fluff and intentionally annoying players.
If you are mafia, then feel free to continue so.
:D: D:D: D:D:DRight now the information that you provided will hang a pile of wifom on top of us on day 2.Sync wrote:
Please explain why it was suspicious of me to answer a question
I'll give you that it can be suspicious jumping on the bandwagon like that so quickly, but oh well. It's done said and done. I can't change back time. It doesn't really matter, because that information isn't vital or game-changing (at this point).
Chain of events.Salvage wrote:
if we're talking about mashley being dumb suggesting that plan i don't know why u don't use the same argument to why sync and bmin responded to it.
oh and ffs again, i thought u learned not to ignore me alreadyMara being Mara is not enough for me to follow. No one has that sort of swing.
Could be trueSalvage wrote:
you're not, the reason is me being awesome
Ok, sure that's the only reason (don't elevate it to "argument" just to make it sound weaker than it already is) I brought up why I'm not voting bmin. But the only reason why people aren't voting Mashley is because they don't think he's cunning enough to try that plan as mafia, which I think is even dumber.Wojjan wrote:
I don't like him. He's tunneling Mashley like some kind of gold digger while the only argument he's bringing up why he's not voting bmin is "cultural differences" or some shit.
Oh, are we going to insults now? Well that's just lovely.Ivalset wrote:
I think all three of them are idiots, but I'm infinitely more suspicious of bmin/sync for throwing that information out there so quickly.
yeah you got me I'm scum ggChris wrote:
Wojjan pushing for another lynch with bad reasoning
step your game up
unvote vote wojjan
Because I agree that, based on his posts up until now he is a suitable lynch at this point. You know, the same reason you usually vote for someone.Sync wrote:
Mashley, why are you voting for Dusty?
zzzz good morning SyncSync wrote:
Sure that makes sense, aside from the fact that you did not give any explanation as to why you do in fact agree with the lynch. I mean, if I were you, I would have known to explain myself considering the position I was in. Jumping on the bandwagon like that made me look more suspicious, so why shouldn't it you? Oh wait... It's because Salvage/Wojjan won't call you out if you agree with them. You knew it too, so that is why you voted for Dusty. I guess you at least TRIED to get the spotlight from under you... anyways, nice try
Vote: Mashley
but I'm about to sleepThis man understands my weak feelings. This is why I will not vote Rantai for this entire year.Rantai wrote:
Mara being Mara is not enough for me to follow. No one has that sort of swing.
The only flaw I see in your plan is that the 2nd vig doesn't have a 100% chance either. That could be another reason as to why the inactive didn't die, unless:Wojjan wrote:
how about we ask the second vig to shoot an inactive
if an inactive dies the vig did well and that doesn't mean anything, worst case.
if they didn't die the vig was roleblocked or a maf extrakill who didn't want to off his teammate.
Case A: whoever was given roleblocker is scum. Two townies dead, Dusty and the NK. Case B: maf are idiots and we have two outed scum. Two townies dead, Dusty and NK.
If the inactive does die then you got what you wanted and I got what I wanted.
Two's reply to this is "Yes", in which case I think the plan would work well.Chris wrote:
@MOD - Assuming there are multiple vigilantes, if a vigilante dies without having used a bullet, will the other vigilante(s) have an improved accuracy chance?
Fair enough then Wojjan.Two wrote:
sure
Rantai wrote:
I think I'll believe Dusty for now.
Leaving me with Sync again.
you're always against me (((What exactly did we overlook? The only reason I voted for him is because I didn't like the way he voted without giving a reason which seemed like it was a convenient way to jump on the bandwagon and get the spotlight off of him. That's done for now I guess... I suppose we always have day 2 to see what happens...Dafydd wrote:
To add: so how about Sync? I think we overlooked this just because of Dusty's roleclaim. In fact, they both pressed Mashley hard.
also wow I just read this again and I lol'dDusty wrote:
I read bmin's posts as just showing Korean cultural differences (saying "sorry" all the time and stuff), not scumminessSalvage wrote:
that paranoid reaction to a simple vote is what im talking about
second vig please shoot dafyddDafydd wrote:
Now I don't know what to believe.
Might as well wait for more answers though. :/