Salvage wrote:

that paranoid reaction to a simple vote is what im talking about

Salvage wrote:

to be honest i think this is the perfect situation for mafia to lay low, and thus i'd suggest a lynch on one of those instead of Mashley who i wouldn't be surprised if he suggested that without overthinking it (not really needed but whatever)

Salvage wrote:

what do u suggest then Rantai

Dafydd wrote:

If Mashley were town, he would still be helping Mafia anyway.

LunaticMara wrote:

Okay, I'll be writing some stuff in here while I'm at work. I'm pretty busy around here.

I just realized that Sync and dkun are in this game. This makes me puke so much that the whole floor looks like shit. It also gave me a boner.

Who is this Dafydd guy? Some dude with AIDS? Damn nigga, you just went full SHAZBOT.

Dafydd wrote:

If Mashley were town, he would still be helping Mafia anyway.

Do you mean Mashley knows about helping Mafia or not? If so, why?

I got nothing else to mention at the moment, really. I like turtles.

JInxyjem wrote:

I wish you'd post useful stuff already

Ivalset wrote:

I think all three of them are idiots, but I'm infinitely more suspicious of bmin/sync for throwing that information out there so quickly.

Salvage wrote:

are u gonna ignore me rantai

NoHItter wrote:

@LunaticMara
If you are town and don't have anything productive to say, then might as well shut up rather than continue posting fluff and intentionally annoying players.

If you are mafia, then feel free to continue so.

Sync wrote:

Please explain why it was suspicious of me to answer a question

I'll give you that it can be suspicious jumping on the bandwagon like that so quickly, but oh well. It's done said and done. I can't change back time. It doesn't really matter, because that information isn't vital or game-changing (at this point).

Salvage wrote:

if we're talking about mashley being dumb suggesting that plan i don't know why u don't use the same argument to why sync and bmin responded to it.

oh and ffs again, i thought u learned not to ignore me already

Salvage wrote:

you're not, the reason is me being awesome

Wojjan wrote:

I don't like him. He's tunneling Mashley like some kind of gold digger while the only argument he's bringing up why he's not voting bmin is "cultural differences" or some shit.

Ivalset wrote:

I think all three of them are idiots, but I'm infinitely more suspicious of bmin/sync for throwing that information out there so quickly.

Chris wrote:

Wojjan pushing for another lynch with bad reasoning

step your game up

unvote vote wojjan

Sync wrote:

Mashley, why are you voting for Dusty?

Sync wrote:

Sure that makes sense, aside from the fact that you did not give any explanation as to why you do in fact agree with the lynch. I mean, if I were you, I would have known to explain myself considering the position I was in. Jumping on the bandwagon like that made me look more suspicious, so why shouldn't it you? Oh wait... It's because Salvage/Wojjan won't call you out if you agree with them. You knew it too, so that is why you voted for Dusty. I guess you at least TRIED to get the spotlight from under you... anyways, nice try

Vote: Mashley

Rantai wrote:

Mara being Mara is not enough for me to follow. No one has that sort of swing.

Wojjan wrote:

how about we ask the second vig to shoot an inactive
if an inactive dies the vig did well and that doesn't mean anything, worst case.
if they didn't die the vig was roleblocked or a maf extrakill who didn't want to off his teammate.

Case A: whoever was given roleblocker is scum. Two townies dead, Dusty and the NK. Case B: maf are idiots and we have two outed scum. Two townies dead, Dusty and NK.

If the inactive does die then you got what you wanted and I got what I wanted.

Chris wrote:

@MOD - Assuming there are multiple vigilantes, if a vigilante dies without having used a bullet, will the other vigilante(s) have an improved accuracy chance?