1. full of wifom
2. totally missleading on good players
3. almost allways makes bad players look really scummy and make some safe lynchs for mafia, they will eventually do it anyways but better give them a chance right?
But if both use the same basis and vote mechanism (ie random voting) what is their difference?
The only difference you pointed out is the follow up which is something separate, which admittedly most random votes blow off with a "oh it was random, leave me alone"
Right? Also;
1. Your roleclaim is full of wifom too. By that end it's the same con.
2. Miss-leading as in people might be tempted to wagon on a 'good' player? (oh so subjective)
3. Which is what your version of 'scumhunting' does. Vote on them, then sees reaction, if they are 'bad' then they'll react poorly and cave to pressure.
Hypocrisy (right word?) gets on my nerves.