Oh shit, I am blind part 2. Sorry for that.
Vote: NoLynchOkay, any experienced player is aware that no lynching is not useful to town 99% of the time. Where this becomes WIFOM-y, however, is ask yourself: Does no lynching sound like a favorable opportunity to mafia, regardless of the player's experience? Anybody who pounces on these players who vote no lynch is immediately suspicious to me, using it as such an easy opportunity to scumpaint. The more experienced the [scumpainting] player, the more suspicious they become. Realize that the ONLY person that will vote for a no lynch is an inexperienced player. Once you realize that, ask yourself, is it more common for an in experienced mafia to vote nolynch, or an inexperienced town? My vote goes for inexperienced town. That said:Fishie wrote:
While a huge part of me doesn't trust Salvage at all, this post made Rantai seem like he was grasping at straws to push a Salvage lynch/roleclaim. There were many cases to be argued at that point of the game that pointed in the direction of Salvage being scummy, but the fact that Rantai acknowledged something as small as this struck me as odd. To specify, labeling the "wasting time" bit to be "rather scummy" seems to be pushing it a lot, and looks like scumpainting. While perhaps Salvage could have chosen his words better, in no means do I think that little bit is scummy. If Salvage ends up rolling town, then I will re-instate this FoS on Rantai.Rantai wrote:
Really now?Salvage wrote:
adam : i'd rather waste time thinking about more important things , we won't reach anything discussing the probabilty of roles being used when we don't know anything about them yet , glad you start moving things with that vote ^_^.
That sounds rather scummy right there, glad to see you don't mind wasting time, as long as it's not around you.
Actually more like 2. Or 1 and a half.Lybydose wrote:
he's played 3 games before
Lybydose wrote:
I see where you're saying with the FoS's on anti no-lynchers, but the fact of the matter is that fishie isn't actually inexperienced. Someone already pointed out that he's played 3 games before this one on this site.
In Mafia III, he actually just voted No Lynch and that was pretty much it.LunaticMara wrote:
FYI, FisHie didn't actually play Mafia II. He was added just for the lulz.
NOW it's been 48 hours.LunaticMara wrote:
@Mod, prod Lilac?
Because I wanted to hear some opinions from you. Also yeah, prod DxS.Lilac wrote:
I'd like to know why Mara rushed my prod to begin with.
Asleep, and also not really having anything to say. I've already stated my opinions.Salvage wrote:
LS where are yoooooooouuu
Rolled wrote:
Salvage why are you waiting on LS specifically?
I really don't think Salvage is neither easy or scummy at all.bmin11 wrote:
blend in by votting an easy and generally scummy looking target without a clear reasoning nor actually focussing on the game.
It would look like that if people only reads the last few posts and I think that's what they are doing. Randomly pops out -> vote -> vanishWojjan wrote:
I really don't think Salvage is neither easy or scummy at all.bmin11 wrote:
blend in by votting an easy and generally scummy looking target without a clear reasoning nor actually focussing on the game.
As far as plans go, there really isn't much to be made with the information we have atm. Combining our two known aux roles into something strategic could result in far too much WIFOM shit involving roleblocks, mafia not killing, shit like that.Salvage wrote:
Cause you already posted your opinions as Wojjan and Lyby did and i actually think that you and them are the only oens that could come with a good plan
This happens every game. When somebody who has roleclaimed, and is still on the verge of getting lynched, there's always a simple post such as "but I'm realllllllllllllly x role." Usually they're pretty easy to read whether or not they're telling the truth, and this post is rubbing the wrong way.Salvage wrote:
mkay so if you guys lynch me today i'm gonna go and rape you all .. cause i'm really a spy infiltrator.
quality interpersonal relationshipsfoulcoon wrote:
i dont like you
no, just switched from phone to iPad. my data connction was shit so i got on wifi.Rolled wrote:
Foulcoon did you really just un-invisible you noob. I swear you were invisible for the past 30 minutes at least.
-Rolled says invisibility is scummy
-Foulcoon goes un-invis
-WIFOMWIFOMWIFOM
KRZY not bmin, and yea i didn't get your point like at all .. seems like the most useless idea i ever heard.Wojjan wrote:
Our initial plan involves bmin dying if Salvage is mafia. If we lynch him right now, because his behavior is pointing abundantly towards scummy, we save a recruiter. Sometimes on D1 you just go with it. They could be town, but that learns us a lot from the people on the bandwagon, more if there's a sensor around.
Wojjan wrote:
I actually think adam and Backfire are town. or at least ther play styles fit with the games where they've been town so far.
Yeah, cuz we don't know what we're doing for D1 yet.fishie wrote:
I don't have any plans for Day 2 so far.
and then wojjan didn't say a word even with the RV already over ..adam2046 wrote:
Unvote
Vote: Wojjan
What?Salvage wrote:
also i found this a little odd :and then wojjan didn't say a word even with the RV already over ..adam2046 wrote:
Unvote
Vote: Wojjan
FoS : Wojjan, adam2046
Salvage wrote:
i'm starting to think you guys should lynch me to learn how to not make stupid decisions also.
Salvage wrote:
also , don't make me roleclaim d1 guys , seriously?
adam2046 wrote:
What?
Maybe try thinking about why I would vote Wojjan. I'm sure the mafia genius Salvage can figure it out.
And does Wojjan have to respond to a single vote? Maybe Wojjan should have roleclaimed, I'm sure that would have worked out great.
No. Vote Salvage harder.Salvage wrote:
ooooooh, did i hit mafia here? yay!
You are implying your HoS to not serious at all and you weren't being suspicious of LS (which the claim itself doesn't make sense to start with). It seems to me pieguy really, I mean really by really not wanting any kinds of suspicion over him. He basically overreacted to such early suspicion and I'm getting a scum read from thispieguy1372 wrote:
2. That wasn't a serious HoS
3. That wasn't a serious HoS