Okay, just spent an hour reading this thread and I can now say a lot of you are pretty bad. Fluff it down a little bit with the one sentence posts, please.
Made some notes of posts that caught my eye. Hopefully I can remember my reasoning now that I'm going back and looking at them.
RARGH I SUCK. Hyperlinked the fucking image, not the post

Now I need to go through this shithole again. Anyways:
Vote: NoLynchOkay, any experienced player is aware that no lynching is not useful to town 99% of the time. Where this becomes WIFOM-y, however, is ask yourself: Does no lynching sound like a favorable opportunity to mafia, regardless of the player's experience? Anybody who pounces on these players who vote no lynch is immediately suspicious to me, using it as such an easy opportunity to scumpaint. The more experienced the [scumpainting] player, the more suspicious they become. Realize that the ONLY person that will vote for a no lynch is an inexperienced player. Once you realize that, ask yourself, is it more common for an in experienced mafia to vote nolynch, or an inexperienced town? My vote goes for inexperienced town. That said:
FoS: Lyby, Savage, and KRZY, in that order pretty much.
Other than that, I have a mild FoS on Rantai, mostly due to meta (at least in my memory). I remember admiring Rantai's play in one game as pro-town, thinking it was very well thought out it persuaded my opinion a lot in said game. I couldn't even find the game that I'm referencing, so hopefully I'm not mixing you up with another person (maybe akro.. >_>) in which case, sorry for the confusion, but at least that eliminates this FoS ^___^
Okay, the
reasoning for the FoS:Rantai wrote:
Salvage wrote:
adam : i'd rather waste time thinking about more important things , we won't reach anything discussing the probabilty of roles being used when we don't know anything about them yet , glad you start moving things with that vote ^_^.
Really now?
That sounds rather scummy right there, glad to see you don't mind wasting time, as long as it's not around you.
While a huge part of me doesn't trust Salvage at all, this post made Rantai seem like he was grasping at straws to push a Salvage lynch/roleclaim. There were many cases to be argued at that point of the game that pointed in the direction of Salvage being scummy, but the fact that Rantai acknowledged something as small as this struck me as odd. To specify, labeling the "wasting time" bit to be "rather scummy" seems to be pushing it a lot, and looks like scumpainting. While perhaps Salvage could have chosen his words better, in no means do I think that little bit is scummy. If Salvage ends up rolling town, then I will re-instate this FoS on Rantai.
Okay, that's just my attempt to point out some bits of this game I felt were overlooked. I'm here for good now though, did you miss me?
also, completely off-topic:I was thinking of putting together an ISO archive to possibly be stickied on this forum. I'd sort by game, then alignment (scum/town), hyperlinking each player's ISO during that game. Is anybody at all interested in this, or better yet interested in helping?