oookay so we're back to stage 1 , results KRZY? ..
forum
Touhou PyP Mafia [GAME OVER - Town wins!]
posted
Total Posts
979
ok so what the hell is a town strongman
Sheer genius, Two. I'm guessing he swapped himself and someone else as part of his secret plan, and that person ended up getting targeted for the nk.
Town strongman = 1-shot vig strongman?
HoS: Raging Bull
He does make posts; none of them have any information at all. His votes consist of a RV and a bandwagon. It seems to me that he's avoiding analysis because he doesn't need to find out who scum are. He claims to have played before so the newbie card doesn't work.
Most noticeably, though, he makes a post an hour before the deadline and yet completely neglects to vote. Instead he pauses to find out how long of a night he has, presumably to decide on his night action.
Tell me, what were you doing last night?
Town strongman = 1-shot vig strongman?
HoS: Raging Bull
He does make posts; none of them have any information at all. His votes consist of a RV and a bandwagon. It seems to me that he's avoiding analysis because he doesn't need to find out who scum are. He claims to have played before so the newbie card doesn't work.
Most noticeably, though, he makes a post an hour before the deadline and yet completely neglects to vote. Instead he pauses to find out how long of a night he has, presumably to decide on his night action.
Tell me, what were you doing last night?
Bus drivers generally can't swap themselves, so I doubt he could have done something like that.
Still, if he was able to do so, KRZY's results would show that Two was bus driven.
Still, if he was able to do so, KRZY's results would show that Two was bus driven.
It depends on how pieguy set it up:
Anyways, that was the best explanation I could come up with for Two's insistence that he would not be shot given his role. Alternatively, he may have been trying to claim night immunity to prevent people from trying to nk him, but either way it didn't work out.MafiaWiki wrote:
Many, but not all, moderators do not allow Bus Drivers to self-target
I really doubt Two bus driven himself because Mashley's target would have swapped as well (unless Hider takes over Bus Driver priority wise).
FoS: bmin11, not reading the threadpieguy1372 wrote:
Hiding takes priority over busdriving. Hiders cannot be roleblocked, but bus drivers can.
Yes I thought I was missing something.bmin11 wrote:
(unless Hider takes over Bus Driver priority wise).
screw it, FoS is useless
vote: bmin11
vote: bmin11
Good point Vote: Raging Bull.Lybydose wrote:
screw it, FoS is useless
I'll let bmin off because I had overlooked pieguy's statement myself.
ok so KRZY was reading this thread but didn't say anything, despite supposedly being an aux role that could have useful information.
It takes less than 1 minute to repeat results from the night. Why no post?
unvote, vote: KRZY
It takes less than 1 minute to repeat results from the night. Why no post?
unvote, vote: KRZY
Lybydose wrote:
ok so KRZY was reading this thread but didn't say anything, despite supposedly being an aux role that could have useful information.
It takes less than 1 minute to repeat results from the night. Why no post?
unvote, vote: KRZY
LoL game started. Just died now so quickly copypastaing
"Two was tracked, killed, motivated, watched, and hidden behind
You also notice that Mashley was tracked, killed, motivated, and watched."
ok then
unvote
unvote
Well then, now all we need is a watcher to correlate the names.KRZY wrote:
"Two was tracked, killed, motivated, watched, and hidden behind
You also notice that Mashley was tracked, killed, motivated, and watched."
What's motivated? and the watcher would not be able to figure which one was the actual killer. Naming everyone may result in several lose in aux roles if we miss lynch or two. Should we still ask for the result?
Actually, nvm about the motivated bit. I understand what it is now (sorry for being such an ESL)
If the watcher results are revealed, the following would happen:
Watcher would have 5 names:
Mashley
Himself
Tracker
Motivator
Mafia
This would obviously expose the tracker and motivator. On the other hand, it also confirms four people (KRZY, watcher, tracker, motivator) as town and one person as mafia.
It's unlikely there would be a mislynch. First off, the the mafia can't really fakeclaim his way out of it. If he doesn't claim at all or claims something different, he's obviously mafia. If he claims watcher or tracker, it would be a duplicate claim of the real person, so we'd have it narrowed down to 50%. However, these roles could be easily confirmed the next night, so it would be best not to lynch either one until the next day. Under this scenario, it's likely the mafia would kill the watcher at night because he is the most powerful of the listed roles.
The alternative is to have no one claim and risk the watcher being randomly killed before revealing any information. On the other hand, it would allow the watcher to possibly gather more results while hidden, but tracker and watcher are both difficult roles to actually get useful results out of through luck.
Watcher would have 5 names:
Mashley
Himself
Tracker
Motivator
Mafia
This would obviously expose the tracker and motivator. On the other hand, it also confirms four people (KRZY, watcher, tracker, motivator) as town and one person as mafia.
It's unlikely there would be a mislynch. First off, the the mafia can't really fakeclaim his way out of it. If he doesn't claim at all or claims something different, he's obviously mafia. If he claims watcher or tracker, it would be a duplicate claim of the real person, so we'd have it narrowed down to 50%. However, these roles could be easily confirmed the next night, so it would be best not to lynch either one until the next day. Under this scenario, it's likely the mafia would kill the watcher at night because he is the most powerful of the listed roles.
The alternative is to have no one claim and risk the watcher being randomly killed before revealing any information. On the other hand, it would allow the watcher to possibly gather more results while hidden, but tracker and watcher are both difficult roles to actually get useful results out of through luck.
Ultimately I suppose it's up to the watcher as to whether he wants to claim or not. He's the most likely to die if this goes through.
Really difficult :S
Please tell me that's not an actual copypaste btw.
?akrolsmir wrote:
Please tell me that's not an actual copypaste btw.
oh right the watcher would have a 6th name - KRZY
I didn't vote for anyone specifically because I didn't want to hop on any bandwagon without any actual proof yet. And I only wanted to make sure we don't post in the thread during the night phase.
At least getting modkilled will verify that you're not lying about being a voyeur I guessKRZY wrote:
?akrolsmir wrote:
Please tell me that's not an actual copypaste btw.
.he's not lying
yeah yeah the point is I hope the mod lets him get off with a warning.
oh i can assure you, what i posted is not what it said on my night PM word for word.akrolsmir wrote:
yeah yeah the point is I hope the mod lets him get off with a warning.
pieguy can confirm.
of course, it contains all the same info.
The thing says "Quote", I think it means literally using the quote tags
ok then, back to lynching scum while the watcher makes up his/her mind about claiming.
Also, so many of your posts are like this, "Don't know what to say", "Not much to say". I get the feeling that you're scum looking to get by without contributing.
Keeping my vote where it is.
Because voting for KRZY totally wasn't bandwagoning right?Raging Bull wrote:
I didn't vote for anyone specifically because I didn't want to hop on any bandwagon without any actual proof yet.
Also, so many of your posts are like this, "Don't know what to say", "Not much to say". I get the feeling that you're scum looking to get by without contributing.
Keeping my vote where it is.
Wow really, bus driver was the "I won't die" guarantee?
Sigh.
Actually I think I agree with Lybydose's watcher claim idea. Assuming there are 4 mafia this game and there seemed to be no serial killers, confirming another mafia would be a very beneficial thing at the moment. We already have a confirmed voyeur and if I am not mistaken the tracker and the watcher will essentially give the same information unless we get some more public night action announcements (>.>).
From a practical viewpoint we stand to lose a (slightly?) redundant role in exchange for another mafia. No, I'm not ignoring the motivator, I just don't know how useful they are.
Also:
Vote: Salvage - I'm not allowing self doubt to hinder me again until something proves otherwise.
Sigh.
Actually I think I agree with Lybydose's watcher claim idea. Assuming there are 4 mafia this game and there seemed to be no serial killers, confirming another mafia would be a very beneficial thing at the moment. We already have a confirmed voyeur and if I am not mistaken the tracker and the watcher will essentially give the same information unless we get some more public night action announcements (>.>).
From a practical viewpoint we stand to lose a (slightly?) redundant role in exchange for another mafia. No, I'm not ignoring the motivator, I just don't know how useful they are.
Also:
Vote: Salvage - I'm not allowing self doubt to hinder me again until something proves otherwise.
Oh whoops about that. I was trusting Two's judgement on that.
Well lets see. Yes I played SC2 mafia before but obviously the mechanics are different from this one. For one, I don't even know what RV was until I played this. I never encountered scum hunting in SC2. Maybe I'll admit I'm playing a lot more passively then most because that's how most played it in SC2. Also why don't you look at Backfire or Kiddo instead of only at me? You even see Kiddo lied about not being on so he didn't post in this thread. Okay so you want me to post what I think.
Well I was wondering why did we let Mashley hide with Two again? The mafia would have gotten a double kill (Like right now). Was someone suppose to protect Two?
Well lets see. Yes I played SC2 mafia before but obviously the mechanics are different from this one. For one, I don't even know what RV was until I played this. I never encountered scum hunting in SC2. Maybe I'll admit I'm playing a lot more passively then most because that's how most played it in SC2. Also why don't you look at Backfire or Kiddo instead of only at me? You even see Kiddo lied about not being on so he didn't post in this thread. Okay so you want me to post what I think.
Well I was wondering why did we let Mashley hide with Two again? The mafia would have gotten a double kill (Like right now). Was someone suppose to protect Two?
No someone was supposed to watch Two.
Which worked out brilliantly - as we can see he was watched (and a whole lot of other stuff).
Which worked out brilliantly - as we can see he was watched (and a whole lot of other stuff).
Basically the controversy about that part of the day was the fact that Two was hinting at the fact he had a trick up his sleeve to avoid a night kill.Two wrote:
I'd rather keep the explanation as minimal as: trust me, you have nothing to worry about if you hide behind me.
Not sure how you missed that.
Oh yeah, as Lybydose said, he was meant to be watched too.
So now all we need to do is wait for watcher to tell us the names KRZY saw?
In my opinion it would help us figure out another mafia, but it's the watcher's call.
Yes. Here's what would happen:
1. Watcher gives us three names that aren't himself/KRZY/Mashley.
2. Those three people claim.
3. Two of them will have identical claims. This narrows down the mafia member to one of those two people.
4. I have a plan to determine which of those two is lying by directing night targets of known roles N2.
5. Lynch whoever was lying tomorrow.
1. Watcher gives us three names that aren't himself/KRZY/Mashley.
2. Those three people claim.
3. Two of them will have identical claims. This narrows down the mafia member to one of those two people.
4. I have a plan to determine which of those two is lying by directing night targets of known roles N2.
5. Lynch whoever was lying tomorrow.
Oh right I have an alternate plan:
1. No one claims
2. Watcher + KRZY + Motivator + Tracker all target the same person tonight. Preferably someone likely to be mafia.
3. If that person lives, the watcher claims and tells us which person from yesterday's result isn't on tonight's result, as that person is mafia.
4. If that person dies, we gain no information at all because the same three people show up again. Hence the "prefer to target mafia" in step 2.
1. No one claims
2. Watcher + KRZY + Motivator + Tracker all target the same person tonight. Preferably someone likely to be mafia.
3. If that person lives, the watcher claims and tells us which person from yesterday's result isn't on tonight's result, as that person is mafia.
4. If that person dies, we gain no information at all because the same three people show up again. Hence the "prefer to target mafia" in step 2.
...posting what you think != asking questions whose answers are easily inferred by doing five seconds of reading.
Also I like your attempts to shift the focus from yourself, first onto other lurkers and then onto the watcher.
---
Lybydose's plans make sense I guess. There's no provision for who to lynch today, though. My proposal should be pretty clear.
Also I like your attempts to shift the focus from yourself, first onto other lurkers and then onto the watcher.
---
Lybydose's plans make sense I guess. There's no provision for who to lynch today, though. My proposal should be pretty clear.
Oh right, in the situation that we go with Plan A, no one except the watcher claim yet. It's best if we specify a claiming order after the names are revealed.
Oh right because obviously having a whole different type of mafia game = understading all the aspects within an fast. I never even heard of the watcher role until reading the mafiascum wiki. I also like how you are so focused on me too. I gave you my defense. You can believe it if you will. At least I actually do post in this thread.
Wassup, guys?
Votecount:
Raging Bull (1) - akrolsmir
Salvage (1) - Rantai
Sorry I didn't write up D2's death scene. It's still pretty cool though.
Votecount:
Raging Bull (1) - akrolsmir
Salvage (1) - Rantai
Sorry I didn't write up D2's death scene. It's still pretty cool though.
lybydose's plans make sense. I prefer Plan B since it would show less roles to the mafia. It's a lot riskier, though, since there's a chance for it to fail.
I'd rather go with the first plan.
Accepting Rantai's assumption that there are four Mafia members, I think we can sacrifice one of the better auxes for a certain Mafia reveal. That'd be huge. I also trust Lyby to perform his trick N2, so for now I would like the watcher to claim and give us info.
Accepting Rantai's assumption that there are four Mafia members, I think we can sacrifice one of the better auxes for a certain Mafia reveal. That'd be huge. I also trust Lyby to perform his trick N2, so for now I would like the watcher to claim and give us info.
so Lyby in what order do you suggest we roleclaim? Plan B sucks because the fact that Two got killed instead of being able to drive himself and a target seems to heavily imply that we got a roleblocker around. If any of the people don't show up in the list (or worse the people watching the target get blocked) we're pretty much screwed having no information other than possibly having boosted a mafia member.
You should be careful with how you throw those motivations around.
You should be careful with how you throw those motivations around.
Wait, wouldn't the roleblock have been seen from KRZY's voyeuring?
Posting, just so it doesent seen like im lurking. I just dont have much to say. Not especially sure what you guys are really suggesting...then ahain I should prpbably just look up to see what a watcher does and it might make sense.
Oh nevermind. I got it ;w;
Watcher first, then ask the others to claim one at a time rather than all at once. The order isn't so important.Wojjan wrote:
so Lyby in what order do you suggest we roleclaim? Plan B sucks because the fact that Two got killed instead of being able to drive himself and a target seems to heavily imply that we got a roleblocker around. If any of the people don't show up in the list (or worse the people watching the target get blocked) we're pretty much screwed having no information other than possibly having boosted a mafia member.
You should be careful with how you throw those motivations around.
Right, KRZY would be able to detect the missing person. If KRZY were blocked there would be no missing person as the block was already used. The biggest problem with plan B is if the mafia just decides to kill our target too. Then we learn nothing and wasted a bunch of time.JInxyjem wrote:
Wait, wouldn't the roleblock have been seen from KRZY's voyeuring?
Plan A seems like the safer one to me , we already did a risky one D1 , not an option to do it again imo.
First off, wtf was Two's plan? I don't understand why he would try to bring Mashley down with him on a fake claim
I don't feel like exposing the Watcher is that great of an idea, because after they get NK'd we lose one of the important puzzle pieces.
Everyone who claims behind them is just going to get picked off one by one, and eventually there will be nobody left.
They should wait and gather more information before outright claiming, at least then we have a chance to catch more than a single Mafia member based on what they say.
I don't feel like exposing the Watcher is that great of an idea, because after they get NK'd we lose one of the important puzzle pieces.
Everyone who claims behind them is just going to get picked off one by one, and eventually there will be nobody left.
They should wait and gather more information before outright claiming, at least then we have a chance to catch more than a single Mafia member based on what they say.
And what if they actually did get NK without telling us anything? Wouldn't that have been a waste?
Of course it would, but they're going to die regardless if they roleclaim.
The only problem is guessing who's going to die.
Scenario 1:
Everyone involved roleclaims, they die every consecutive night until they're all dead.
Possibly lynch a town player hunting for Mafia - 50/50 chance.
Probably lynch a town player every day consecutively.
Scenario 2:
No one roleclaims, someone gets lynched/mafia kill a person tonight.
With 14 people, assuming there are 3 mafia left, that's 11 people they have to pick from. I doubt they're gonna pinpoint the Watcher in one night.
Roleclaim on D3 with possibly two Mafia names, and then use process of elimination to kill the last one off.
The only problem is guessing who's going to die.
But then you have to hope the watcher targets who the mafia targets or he's basically completely useless too.
Unless you meant that with - The only problem is guessing who's going to die.
Unless you meant that with - The only problem is guessing who's going to die.
yeahRantai wrote:
But then you have to hope the watcher targets who the mafia targets or he's basically completely useless too.
Unless you meant that with - The only problem is guessing who's going to die.
we have a Voyeur/Watcher/Tracker, all of them help increase the chances of figuring out who did what
if they all targeted different people (especially if the Tracker) it would be more wide spread on the information we gather.
that's basically 3 chances for town, 1 for mafia
makes sense to me
Then again it's 3 people we won't mislynch giving us a greater chance to lynch a mafia, we won't have a chance to lose that information, we will probably get rid of another mafia (bringing the count to 2) and we will still have at least 1 of their information (which is luck based from here on in) for the next 2-3 days. Not to mention the other roles we may have.
Overall it seems the good outweighs the bad.
Overall it seems the good outweighs the bad.
There is definitely a chance for a mislynch given option 1, you're pretty much guaranteed to kill one town to figure out who the mafia is.Rantai wrote:
Then again it's 3 people we won't mislynch giving us a greater chance to lynch a mafia, we won't have a chance to lose that information, we will probably get rid of another mafia (bringing the count to 2) and we will still have at least 1 of their information (which is luck based from here on in) for the next 2-3 days. Not to mention the other roles we may have.
Overall it seems the good outweighs the bad.
If the Watcher does decide to claim it's just going to end badly, after you kill the mafia (today, but possibly tomorrow after lynching a roleclaimed town on accident), Watcher will die, then whoever else claimed the day after.
Is it really worth killing 3 town for 1 mafia? After they're all dead we'll have nothing to go on and we'll be back at D1.
What state will we be in when we've lost another 2-4 town (assuming mislynchs, after 2 days)?
We'll be holding on to the hope that our informative roles don't get lynched or night killed.
We'll be holding on to the hope that our informative roles don't get lynched or night killed.
As long as the mislynches aren't Watcher/Voyeur/Tracker we're always gonna be better off killing off other people. They are the most important roles in the game right now, and after they are gone we have absolutely nothing.
4 town for 2
3 town for 1
and even so, if they roleclaim tomorrow it's still possible to get 3-2 assuming we get the lynch right. (and one of the 3 watcher roles hits the NK target)
4 town for 2
3 town for 1
and even so, if they roleclaim tomorrow it's still possible to get 3-2 assuming we get the lynch right. (and one of the 3 watcher roles hits the NK target)
I just can't agree, it's far too dependent on luck.
After we kill the mafia member, what is your plan after that?Rantai wrote:
I just can't agree, it's far too dependent on luck.
Unless someone has an awesome role and didn't target Two last night, pretty sure it's just going to be mislynch NK mislynch NK every day/night period.
The hope here is that either; we have more than just those 3 auxs for information and we work on that or we use what information we can get before they die (chances are one of them will get some more information seeing as they already know who is going to be targeted by a mafia) and mount the lynches off that.
My question is what are we going to do if our auxs get lynched or night killed?
My question is what are we going to do if our auxs get lynched or night killed?
Obviously if a Watcher is about to get lynched he would roleclaim, just like anybody else. It's not like I'm telling them to just be quiet and don't say anything even when you're being voted for, just don't claim when you hardly have any information.Rantai wrote:
The hope here is that either; we have more than just those 3 auxs for information and we work on that or we use what information we can get before they die (chances are one of them will get some more information seeing as they already know who is going to be targeted by a mafia) and mount the lynches off that.
My question is what are we going to do if our auxs get lynched or night killed?
They are going to be night killed a lot sooner if they claim today than if they didn't, so I don't get what you're saying.
Ok, fair enough on the lynch part.
What I'm trying to get at is if the watcher is NK'd tonight, we've just been shot in the foot with no information taken. I don't really like luck based plans.
What I'm trying to get at is if the watcher is NK'd tonight, we've just been shot in the foot with no information taken. I don't really like luck based plans.
I think this is a case of guaranteed information vs a potential for more.
If the watcher claims now and gives all the information it's 100% NK'ed next night , if he tries to stay quiet and get even more information that could be really usefull D3 or even D4 chances of him being killed are not big at all , and it could be more usefull .. yeah i think that's a better plan that the previous one.
I'd like some more input on this.
Rolled, you've been quiet since N1. Any thoughts?
Rolled, you've been quiet since N1. Any thoughts?
Yep.
Hoping they get the right targets.
Hoping they live through the night.
It's down to if you are willing to take the risk of losing it all for more.
Hoping they get the right targets.
Hoping they live through the night.
It's down to if you are willing to take the risk of losing it all for more.
It's not really a hope if they live through the night, it's a 1 in 11 chance they get killed.
the second part yeah, but there is 3 different people.
besides themselves it'd bring the number down to 8, and if they each picked a different person that'd be 5 people left out. Not to mention if the Tracker hits a Mafia and they target someone that night, and that person dies it's a confirmed Mafia right off the bat.
technically you could confirm 2 mafia in 1 night on top of the one from N1
that's pretty much game
the second part yeah, but there is 3 different people.
besides themselves it'd bring the number down to 8, and if they each picked a different person that'd be 5 people left out. Not to mention if the Tracker hits a Mafia and they target someone that night, and that person dies it's a confirmed Mafia right off the bat.
technically you could confirm 2 mafia in 1 night on top of the one from N1
that's pretty much game
If I had anything to add or suggest with the plans, I would. But having to refer to mafiawiki every time I want to distinguish between voyeur, watcher, and tracker is annoying. Confusing setup.KRZY wrote:
Rolled, you've been quiet since N1.
Can't get too into the game right now for some reason, hopefully that changes later tonight so I can contribute.
By the way, as hypocritical as this sounds, I think Kiddo ragequit mafia in general so prod him if I may. Let's get him replaced sooner rather than later if that's the case.
ib kiddo is the watcher
also Chris I have no idea where you're pulling these numbers from. There are 14 players alive, not 11.
1 in 11 townies, unless mafia want to tactically night kill?
or just not kill at all, which would be hilarious
actually so in that case it would be 3 in 11, but we already know KRZY is the voyeur (which can't really determine any useful information on its own), so it's more like a 2 in 10 chance of the tracker or watcher dying.
Topic Starter
I can't because Day 2 hasn't lasted 24 hours. Once it has I'll prod him if he hasn't posted.Rolled wrote:
I think Kiddo ragequit mafia in general so prod him if I may. Let's get him replaced sooner rather than later if that's the case.
I'd prefer plan A because I've got some confilicting information from KRZY's results and I'd kinda like to know what the heck is going on.
oh really
Ya rly.Lybydose wrote:
oh really
Lynching one maf isn't such an accomplishment that it's worth outing three auxes. I think the information from revealing would be more beneficial to scum at this point. Also if we wait, when we finally use the info to lynch the scum we will have more information about them and their likely scumbuddies.
Though really it's up to the watcher to choose. We should move on under the assumption that the watcher wants to stay hidden until s/he reveals. In other words, Plan B for now.
Meanwhile, vote for someone you think is scum. Preferably Raging Bull.
Though really it's up to the watcher to choose. We should move on under the assumption that the watcher wants to stay hidden until s/he reveals. In other words, Plan B for now.
Meanwhile, vote for someone you think is scum. Preferably Raging Bull.
You see, the information I have points to KRZY lying, unless this game is even more oddly set up than it already is.akrolsmir wrote:
Lynching one maf isn't such an accomplishment that it's worth outing three auxes. I think the information from revealing would be more beneficial to scum at this point. Also if we wait, when we finally use the info to lynch the scum we will have more information about them and their likely scumbuddies.
Though really it's up to the watcher to choose. We should move on under the assumption that the watcher wants to stay hidden until s/he reveals. In other words, Plan B for now.
Meanwhile, vote for someone you think is scum. Preferably Raging Bull.
That is why I'd prefer plan A.
LadySuburu wrote:
You see, the information I have points to KRZY lying, unless this game is even more oddly set up than it already is.akrolsmir wrote:
Lynching one maf isn't such an accomplishment that it's worth outing three auxes. I think the information from revealing would be more beneficial to scum at this point. Also if we wait, when we finally use the info to lynch the scum we will have more information about them and their likely scumbuddies.
Though really it's up to the watcher to choose. We should move on under the assumption that the watcher wants to stay hidden until s/he reveals. In other words, Plan B for now.
Meanwhile, vote for someone you think is scum. Preferably Raging Bull.
That is why I'd prefer plan A.
Uh, I did not lie.
I'd like some elaboration on your claim, or is it too dangerous to do so?
I can elaborate, but it would require two or more claims.KRZY wrote:
Uh, I did not lie.
I'd like some elaboration on your claim, or is it too dangerous to do so?
What do you mean unless?
I don't understand how it can be one or the other
you either do or don't
I don't understand how it can be one or the other
you either do or don't
To specify, role claims.LadySuburu wrote:
I can elaborate, but it would require two or more claims.
LS, how did you get your information? I'm not saying to claim, but did you get it by investigating KRZY or something?
Actually I'll be more generic. Did you target KRZY?
Revealing how I got it requires me to claim as I've mentioned.Lybydose wrote:
LS, how did you get your information? I'm not saying to claim, but did you get it by investigating KRZY or something?
I did not.Lybydose wrote:
Actually I'll be more generic. Did you target KRZY?
I think I prefer plan B. It seems like a classic case of risk vs reward. We could get those from KRZY's report to role claim now and get 50/50 chance to lynch or we could wait few days to get better results. Although I'm rather curious what report LS has that conflicts with KRZYs ._.
And what's scum anyways?
And what's scum anyways?
Anti-TownRaging Bull wrote:
And what's scum anyways?
Vote: Kiddo-kun.
Haven't said anything yet since day 2.
Haven't said anything yet since day 2.
Gah.
Vote: Kiddo-Kun
Vote: Kiddo-Kun
I think he said he quitted mafia , not worth a lynch imo.
He did? Where did he say he quit Mafia?
He told me on osu after WWV and to some others also , and dropped out from Video game theme mafia.
I'd suggest a replacement for him asap.
Mod?
I'd suggest a replacement for him asap.
Mod?
We have recognised this.
Looking for a replacement now.
Looking for a replacement now.