Like I said, maybe attacking isn't the right word.Chris wrote:
that really doesn't make sense, mainly what I read is them asking for an explanation so they weren't blindly following Two which is more than reasonable. "trust me cause I say so" isn't exactly the most convincing argument ever
I fail to see how they are doing anything but pointing out that Two has explained nothing in this supposed master plan
also how can you even claim Mashley is doing anything when it's Two asking him to use his hider ability on him, which could potentially end in his death
After a gambit like that, and in addition to the hints that two's already given towards what he can do, it's better IMO to go ahead and have Mash hide behind Two. Having two explain more when it will just be detremental to town with an explanation is stupid. (Yes, I believe him when he says that.)
But yknow, I've noticed very few people think even near to the same way that I do on these forums. Maybe trying to explain it is pointless. I've just noticed that any time I pull a gambit large like that (which to my memory has never been when I'm mafia), one of the people attacking me (or more) has always been mafia. Also, I tend to fail to explain it properly enough to those who don't believe me (Though I'm not sure if this applied with any of my gambits in WWG in the past.).