Lilac, who do you think got roleblocked?
That's interesting that you think I didn't get a result N2. Nice roleclaim.Lilac wrote:
Oh wait, you didn't get a result N2... If anything I think foul blocked you. Or pieguy, but more likely foul... Let me read more of the thread though... I'm as confused as you are.
You assumed I got no results because you knew that Mafia attempted to roleblock me.Lilac wrote:
So I didn't read the thread before posting. Give me a break, I'm even stealing my dad's iPhone to type this.
What makes you think someone got roleblocked because I don't understand you anymore.
You said this before I said that.Chris wrote:
It makes no sense for no one to have been roleblocked, so why would you think that?
Lilac wrote:
What makes you think there IS a roleblocker for the final time?
This is not a confirmation, but it's likely to have one. Also, if there weren't a role blocker, they would have just NK'ed Chris. In this case, Mashley would have gotten NK'ed, which did not happened. What does this indicate? Mafia decided not to kill Chris and just role block him I bet.bmin11 wrote:
And because we only had a single NK, we may have a doctor. It would be reasonable to assume Mafia Roleblocker would also be present in that case.
Right but my target has the ability to leave at night, so my action didn't work.Chris wrote:
The fact I got roleblocked means that Foulcoon couldn't have been.
How would I know? I don't have an ability.Lilac wrote:
Actually, I've got a better way.
Mash, were you roleblocked last night?
He could have targetted you as a vig, or a SK targetted others and said "I targetted Lilac, but I think I got roleblocked". This got complicated because we never knew of your ability to escape for a night. So, this is still WIFOM and there aren't a way to prove it I guess.Lilac wrote:
akro: I think pieguy is Mafia but I'm beginning to think you are as well for some reason, probably on a very slight suspicion though.
Foul is also content with sticking to the fact that he tried to kill me which meant who killed Wojjan? This is all under chris's hypothetical statement mind you.
In case you missed that outChris wrote:
akrolsmir + bmin11 are both pro-town.
What made the Mafia not want to NK Chris?As I posted before, I bet they just role blocked him, because that's all it takes to silence him pretty much. However...
Was Two that important to have dead?Two was not the case like Chris. Two basically ran the scumhunting during D2. Role blocking would not be so effective against Two, so I bet they NK'ed him instead of Chris. It's one stone two birds for mafia.
But that's not the only suspicious thing Mara has done thus far, and hopefully I don't need to point them out. Not entirely sure how Mara has remained pretty under the radar.LunaticMara wrote:
When I chose FisHie, I was expecting to get a jester due he is always in tuuba (like me). But I got this boring townie role. (IMAD)
I dunno about what's "standard," but I consider a modkill to be the last resort.Rolled wrote:
I believe a modkill is standard play when a player expresses disinterest, and no replacements are available?
Simply because I aimed to get FisHie. I didn't want anyone else, so I used really unknown people too in my list. Is there a reason why I shouldn't be telling the fact? And peppy? Oh you. I am not really sure what are you trying to say in there, but I guess it's just Rolled. Eat some potatoes, boy.Rolled wrote:
I will note that in the same post, he made an (almost unnatural) effort to point out his choices for PyP weren't very known in the community. It would be much harder to claim a role like Vanilla if you'd end up being peppy, or somebody similar.
I haven't really trusted pieguyYou may explain that to start with
Sure thing, once I get in my workplace (in 1,5 hours).bmin11 wrote:
You may explain that to start with
Maybe, but as I said before I was already suspicious of him in the first place, and considering it's quite easy to lie about being a townie, this makes it more likely he's mafia IMO.Rolled wrote:
Pieguy: Do you think LunaticMara is telling the truth about being Vanilla Town?
We were both in the same mafia game at one point. Actually, I only picked him because I wanted to be an anime character (inb4 you rage at me). My 3 choices were Index-san, Saten-san, and Hentai (just for the fun of it).bmin11 wrote:
I'm interested on why pieguy would have picked Index-San as well. I haven't heard of him so ofen (no offence). Maybe because of my inactivity idk
Rolled - Dunno man. Stay in the bus and do stuff. Totally pro-town.While you don't think people who got near confirmation by Chris to be uncertain, but you are very sure Rolled is town, huh?
Lilac - I trust this man is 100% pro-town. But why Hito..?I would like to hear what makes him truthful
foulcoon - Mafia?A mafia that went to shoot Two, but not Lilac while he said he will shoot Lilac?
akrolsmir - Claimed to be Sakura Hana - What powers have you used and to who?If you read the end of D2 and the night result, you can tell he used his Night Vig ability to shoot Rantai
bmin11 - How is this 50% chance working? Is 0_o just throwing the dice or something? Anyway, I'll trust you. And cute avatar. It makes me go HHHNNNNGGG when I write this post.I'm going to bet 0_o (or Lyby) would use a program for this (or he could just flip a coin as you suggested). tl;dr and my avatar is so off-topic looooool
LunaticMara and pieguy are both townies.I'm pretty sure one or another of you guys are going to be mafia (or even both of you). I would rather have Rolled + anyone of you guys to be tested by Chris.
To add more, akrolsmir did wrote "foulcoon possibly being a mafia, but Lilac would also be a mafia in this case".bmin11 wrote:
foulcoon - Mafia?A mafia that went to shoot Two, but not Lilac while he said he will shoot Lilac?
Why?bmin11 wrote:
To add more, akrolsmir did wrote "foulcoon possibly being a mafia, but Lilac would also be a mafia in this case".
Why?Because mafia did not know Lilac's ability. If they just went and kill Two and just bluntly say "I probably got roleblocked", that would make him look really suspicious. It's hard to believe a mafia would role block foulcoon, so the only way foulcoon being mafia is when Lilac is also mafia and claim "I have an ability to leave for a night". This gives a reason why foulcoon couldn't kill Lilac without being so suspicious.
What makes Lilac so untrustable?This has been discussed pages ago. I agree this is not an absolute truth, but just a suspicion based on assumption basing on scenarios. However, I can't see why you could just believe Lilac would be town. I want to hear it from you.
Does insane bus drivers even exist? Or are you saying that Rolled is bluffing us all the time?Possible. However, It's quite slim and I also think Rolled is town, but it's not near confirmation or anything, but just gut feelings from the way he posts. Don't tell me you believe in your guts over information.
LadySuburu wrote:
Posting to say that I'm here and have been reading.Just don't have anything to post yetand discussions are going on.
Oh, I should mention this. In pretty much any mafia game anywhere, a modkill sets the person's role to Neutral Survivor. So, a modkill doesn't help us with chris.Rolled wrote:
This is what I suggest:
Lynch/modkill rust.
If rust is town, proves Chris is Sane/Naive. A couple different routes to take N3 for Chris:
1. "(Scummy alive player) is pro-town" If false, Chris is Sane and we lynch. If true, we lynch to test? I dunno that's dodgy.
2. "Rantai is pro-town." If true, proves Chris is naive. If false, we were better off choosing option 1.
If rust is mafia, proves chris is Insane/Naive.
1. "Chris is pro-town." If true, Chris is Naive.
-If false, proves Chris is insane. One or both of Akro/Bmin is/are mafia.
It's 6am, hopefully that makes sense.
What is this, admitting you're the SK and that you killed Wojjan?bmin11 wrote:
foulcoon - Mafia?A mafia that went to shoot Two, but not Lilac while he said he will shoot Lilac?
I don't understand where it said that at allfoulcoon wrote:
What is this, admitting you're the SK and that you killed Wojjan?
If I may ask, why? Is there a flaw in my reasoning? If so, please point this out so I can avoid it in the future.LadySuburu wrote:
Unvote, Vote: pieguy1372