Lost Requiem

00:13:200 - The beginning part's background sounds is very long so I think the LN ended too early here . can end on 00:14:100 - or even extend one LN later than 00:14:400 - to create a sense of
for same reason , 05:22:536 (322536|4) - can be extended and end on 05:28:865 -

00:13:950 - since it still had a sound here so wondering can be lengthened or not for those LNs at 00:01:950 (1950|3,4800|0,4800|4,8400|5,9600|6,10800|1) - , cuz there no clearly stop sign of the music, it's kinda odd.

00:29:100 - 00:33:900 - 00:34:200 - ... check every 1/2 , I found many pianos are missed . The beginning rest part is very long , so I tend to grab onto every piano as you did like 00:26:700 (26700|3) - this one .Otherwise, the waiting finger will be slightly boring
00:43:200 - Even here I think we can remove/shorten some LNs and make room for piano notes

some consistency issue if you think that need to be fixed
given those 00:32:400 (32400|2,32400|1,32400|3) - 00:24:000 (24000|3,24000|6,24000|0) - melody all got tripled LN setting, wondering can this 00:28:500 (28500|0,28800|3) - one be changed to by adding release or new LN (dk depends on you guys) to more fix the chordsize thing

00:35:400 - another shift melody shift in, I think can be added, depends on you wanna do another LN or make a inverse from other LN

00:37:800 - 00:38:100 - those two had some melody kinda obv. like 00:29:400 (29400|2,29700|5) - , guess can be caught

00:55:200 - can make 2 LNs start here , now only one cuz the vocals and cello have both undergone a transition here

01:06:000 (66000|2,66300|3,66600|4,66600|6) - if those for me violin sonud then you might missed those 01:05:100 - 01:05:400 - 01:05:700 - which so clear and obv.

01:18:050 - the grace here feels late (although 25% seems correct, but hear with 100%) Due to the long breath, the actual pressing time gives the impression of being too late.I sugg move here

01:23:475 - 01:23:625 - vs 01:28:275 (88275|3,88425|2) - I think ther are same but seems you just catch the the latter . Is it a intention progressive ?

01:24:600 - I know you may ignore the violin here intentionally but I think this one is specical , so 01:24:450 (84450|1) - seems too long . may be we can describe it with LN like
Another explanation is you use this structure 01:24:600 (84600|4,84600|0,84675|2,84750|4,84750|0,84825|2) - to describe the violin but I think the sound is not vibrate enough

01:29:550 - as well

01:28:275 (88275|3,88425|2) - even they got little different compared to 01:23:250 - but still didn't feel that 1/4 are so clearly to catch

01:32:325 (92325|2,92325|4) - unnecessary doubled for me since that 01:32:025 (92025|1) - this already used 1 note for that heavy, feel kinda over imo

01:33:000 - there are some clear violins I think you can make them short LNs like you did before (01:28:200 (88200|6,88350|5,88500|4,88650|3) - ) for better layering . As this logic , 01:33:525 - should be rice , and 01:32:850 (92850|1) - should be ended before 01:33:300 -
Can do sth like

01:33:825 (93825|1,94425|3) - vs 01:34:125 (94125|2) - seems the latter has no drum . but fix this wil destroy the translational structure, but I still believe that accuracy should be the main focus

I need some explanation for those 1/16 lengthened LN, beside visual part, any reasonable victor on note/melody/expression side? 01:34:500 (94500|6,94800|1,94800|4,94800|0,94800|3,94950|5,94950|2,95100|3,95100|2,95100|0,95250|5,95250|4,95250|6,95250|1,95400|1,95400|2,95550|3,95550|4,95550|0,95700|5,95700|2,95700|0,95850|3,95850|1) -

I think this 1/4 should be mapped in note (by adding one more object beside the LN?) since 01:36:225 (96225|1,96300|0) - 01:36:825 (96825|2,96900|4) - 01:39:525 (99525|3,99600|4) - that 1/4 rhythm really continued, so can be mapped with obv. object to catch/expresss that

01:42:900 (102900|5,102900|6,102975|4,102975|5) - vs 01:44:175 - I think we have enough space to make it 01:44:175 - double , ps 01:41:775 (101775|2) - can be single yeah cuz the subsequent chords occupied the position
Also you can compare with this 01:53:775 (113775|1,113775|2) -

01:45:300 - 个人爱好，这一拍想拉长点

01:48:393 - the LN is too short here ? how about use this , just reject if you dont like

01:50:700 - to 01:51:300 - seems excessive pressure on the left hand . try this ? can also make a jack for the drum syncopation . Ive test it and fell comfortable :3 . Check copypaste part if apply

01:54:900 - vs 01:45:300 - 我觉得前者更好一点，感觉这里更像是转着行进的一个东西，01:45:300 (105300|3,105300|6,105318|2,105325|5,105337|1,105350|4) - 略微有点拍了。看你吧

01:59:850 (119850|2,119850|0,119925|2,119925|0,120000|0) - This is really hard to hit all 300s . I know you are ctrl+H from 01:50:250 - But the latter doesn't have 3-jack . maybe can try to move cols on 02:00:000 -

02:06:768 (126768|0) - idk what sounds here, for grace like 02:06:750 (126750|1,126768|0) - ? it seems just a 1/8 dump thing so why 1/16 here

02:07:050 - seems error chordsize on 1/4 lines , and I found that 02:06:600 - this burst is longer than real sound , so we can make it shorter and 02:06:975 - here make ctrl+H of 02:05:850 -
Just like

02:15:750 - Can add one on space compare with 02:14:550 - (no drum)

02:17:325 - vs 02:17:400 - and 02:17:850 - vs 02:18:000 - , chordsize. Also 02:18:150 - Seems no need to set a rice and not goodlooking. I think . try sth like this ?

I'll suggest you do a exchange for those 02:18:300 (138300|3,138300|4,138525|4,138750|3,138750|4,138975|4) - like make it more nice to play for both hand and 4x beat, or you just wanna keep the col [4] can be

02:24:000 - this is the first looong vocal of this part . how about set an long LN on space to describe it ? as you did like 02:34:800 (154800|3) -
if apply , 02:26:400 - 02:27:600 - can also add on col 1 / 7

02:29:925 - I just feel the heavy beat/rhythm feeling happened 02:29:925 - not 02:29:850 -

02:31:125 - 1/4 is better ? seems no need to grace and can make different from 02:33:450 (153450|4,153487|3,153525|2) - ,also consist with here 02:29:925 -

02:51:300 - the snap here is too fast imo , 02:51:300 - here has sth and we can just use 02:51:450 - to describe breath sound, also make it same as other transition place like 02:46:500 - (althoug its for drum)

02:54:600 (174600|4) - I guess this LN is for vocal ,so it should not seperated on 02:55:200 -
Make them 02:54:600 (174600|4) - 02:55:200 (175200|4) - as one LN is more comfortable and like real music

02:57:600 (177600|0,177825|2,178125|4,178200|6,178500|3) - I think the piano here is definitly highlight this part . I really want to buff them . The current version they integrate with grace and does not fully reflect it
So we can try this , Also , set 02:57:600 (177600|0) - to 1/4 LN cuz piano and 02:58:650 (178650|5) - make this rice cuz no piano

02:58:800 (178800|5) - it would be better if this one can be changed into LN like you did before 02:58:500 (178500|3) - in 1/6, then all the melody can be expressed in a whole 02:57:800 (177800|2,178100|4,178200|6,178500|3,178800|5) -

03:00:646 - Let's describe it in more details
And 03:03:119 - this grace seems not evenly distributed compare with 03:02:337 (182337|3,182396|4,182454|5,182513|3,182572|4,182631|5) -

03:02:690 - sound missing!

03:10:307 - OK I think this part is too painting , we can use rolly things when long vocal or cello occured ,but dont forget there are also violins . When music only consists of violin and drums we should use more clean patterns imo
Good place : 03:16:307 - nice roll
OK place : 03:10:682 - have background vocal so can use roll
Bad place : 03:12:182 - violin+drum only
// 03:20:807 - vs 03:21:182 - Grace are only occured the 2nd beat
check them until 03:52:307 -

03:11:057 (191057|2,191119|1) - didnt get the 1/6 gap here, seems werid to me compared to other part you mapped 03:14:057 (194057|2,194088|1,194119|0) - 03:21:182 (201182|4,201213|5,201244|6) -

03:20:877 (200877|2,200900|1,200924|0,200971|6,200971|3,200994|5,201017|4) - 这个转好像没有什么必要，关键是03:21:228 - 这地方有小提琴的花，有必要做出对比

03:31:525 (211525|6) - 后面这段小提琴，所有的主音你都抓到正确位置了，唯独这个早了特别多，打起来错位感觉明显，可以重新排列一下，参考

（最左边为lead）

03:31:900 (211900|6) - I guess you use long LN for violin , if so ,this one should be start on 03:32:057 -

04:03:932 (243932|0,243932|5,243932|1,243932|4,243932|6) - it can be 1357 for better visual also the pressure. quad might be good for density IMO not 5

04:04:307 - I think this rap part should be slightly nerf . now it plays like a continuously and intensively speed part , but In fact, music fluctuates with the pause of lyrics, and accordingly, some background notes' grace can be eliminated
Parts that need improvement e.g：
1、04:08:542 - to 04:08:895 - for this beat ,I think grace sound should only be from 04:08:630 - to 04:08:807 -

2、04:15:954 - this roll seems seprated by white line , but current ver roll from 04:15:601 - to 04:16:307 - with no break

i do believe that 04:06:071 (246071|6,246101|5,246130|4,246159|3,246307|3,246336|2,246365|1,246395|0) - and 04:17:365 (257365|0,257395|1,257424|2,257454|3,257601|3,257630|4,257659|5,257689|6) - had difference no matter the dump sounds position or the density, can be changed with slight different setting ig

compared 04:12:424 (252424|3,252424|4,252424|0,252512|1,252512|0,252601|3,252601|2,252689|6,252689|2,252689|1) - and 04:23:718 (263718|3,263718|2,263807|6,263807|5,263983|4,263983|5,263983|0) - they are different but the sound pretty similar, yeah LN can be changed for different setting but the beat consistency sound or the rhythm should be setting similar imo

04:13:307 (253307|2,253395|4,253395|3,253439|6,253439|5) - These should be 1/6

not against the cartral symmetry but 04:18:248 - 04:18:292 - 04:18:336 - 04:18:380 - there got pretty clear 4x 1/8 sounds, kinda a pity to ignore just do the visual thing

04:26:939 - how about make these LN longer to emphsize the delay sound

im not sure does those dump for vocal? if it's then check 04:27:336 (267336|0,267380|1,267512|1,267557|0) - and 04:28:395 (268395|0,268439|1,268615|1,268659|0) - , the later one #2 grace starting from 04:28:615 - but the sound seems started from 04:28:571 - like 04:27:512 - , if for more expression ACC. side ill suggest to change it

04:32:189 (272189|0,272211|1,272255|2,272321|3,272387|2,272432|1,272454|0) - vs 04:31:836 (271836|6,271858|5,271902|4,271968|3,272034|4,272079|5,272101|6) - I believe the former matches that sound very well, but the latter 04:31:865 - seems composed of three distinct syllables. I would prefer to describe them correctly rather than using simple symmetry

04:36:159 - 这里这一团LN似乎并没有背景那个长音，也就是说和04:35:454 - 以及前面类似的结构是不一样的声音

05:04:280 (304280|2,304351|2) - seems the only one jacky compare with 05:05:851 - 05:07:351 - .... hard to hit wo I sugg delete this one 05:04:351 (304351|2) -

05:05:851 (305851|0,305851|3,305851|1,305944|3,305944|1) - since this sound 05:05:944 - pretty high like a tone change shifting something like that, so the normal stack/jack seems kinda not enough in expression , I suggest to make it hit by other hand like

05:08:101 - how about use 1/8 for coherence and also because sound changed here 05:08:288 -

05:14:501 - this is good

05:16:001 - how about design a follow-up action

Here is a small question of mine
05:24:250 - to 05:26:096 - In this section, because it uses 130bpm, the vibrato of the violin seems difficult to be align. I found that you used 1/6 to 3/16 for fitting.
If using 140bpm, it seems to be able to continue the 3/16 interval by here 05:23:661 (323661|3,323741|1,323822|5,323902|3,323982|6,324063|0,324143|1,324223|5) -

05:33:388 (333388|2) - wanna end on 05:34:288 - cuz breath . 05:33:388 (333388|5) - can keep for structure