I don't know much about mapping but isn't the accuracy value normally higher than 6? I could be wrong, but I thought it was around 7.5.
Yeah I knew u1d's LOST letter here is so damn cool but for ranable side, sorry I have to say this is seems not that proper for me.
-
based on the melody itself
-
01:40:800 - L
here just a vocal 1/1 and some 1/4 beat rhythm,, and a dump feeling after 01:41:025 - , so basically how to express those thing you made 01:40:800 (100800|5,100800|4,100900|3,100937|2,100950|4,100975|5) -
-
01:45:600 - O
a vocal 1/1 and 3x 1/4 melody with a dump feeling after 01:45:750 - , the "o" dumping here basically cant show the melody on 01:45:600 - 01:45:675 - 01:45:750 -
-
01:50:400 - S
a part similar to L, so the overall setting is totally different with L, can't be expressed or explained well imo.
-
01:55:200 - T
a part similar to O
I think we'd better make this part more reasonable for the song itself, not LOST, 不然真的很难解释非常牵强
jump to this part, yeah, LETTER is really COOL like COOLEST but only it can be explained well in rankable side when ranking, or it really hard to explain why mapped like that unless only do visual.
-
06:41:788 (401788|0,401788|6,401863|3,401938|4,401938|2,402013|1,402013|5,402388|2,402388|4,402388|1,402388|5,402425|3,402988|5,402988|3,402988|2,402988|4,402988|1,403213|4,403213|5,403213|3) -
thing like this I'll pointed out that the rhythm here is 3/4 this the beat rhythm composer made, based on this we can found that MWC letters are not really fit the rhythm in this part, cuz when it came to LNed,
that just really hard to explain why the middle rhythm of 3/4 part got 3 different style, 2LNs+1note, 3notes and 3 LNs
personally think it does play fine here without feeling too awkward imo, if it does interrupt the playability here then I do consider changing them. Yes I would like to keep it for the visual and I think it would be cool to keep them although from ranking pov it does feel inconsistent. I believe we can make this exceptional for this part since it plays only the small part.
Let me know what you thought
I must declare that I have no hostility or opinion towards this behavior because for visual effects, we can even create more letters, not just MWC. I know this song is very meaningful, but because it is too important, it will have a great impact. Starting from the perspective of whether there are any issues with playing, I believe that this is indirectly encouraging everyone to insert various meaningful letters through visual means. In other words, if we assume that MWC can do this because it is a World Cup, then events in other regions will be affected too and keep their letter in maps when it's TB, even some latter witch hard to "draw" like Q, G, K, X.
-
Standardization, rationality of expression, impact of significant events on the future, and quality of maps. I sincerely hope that this map is more based on its own melody and instruments rather than creating specific effects (due to its high attention, the standards aren't be too relaxed)
-
Once again, I really like and support this idea, and I have also used it myself. But through previous editions of TB ('22, '23, '24), these letters were not preserved (if the map had).
dropping my 2 cents here
if the letters art in question poses no playability issue, and is accurate to the song (which imo is already accurate enough) we really don't have to think about it too much. unless it is detrimental to the gameplay of course.
in the end the map is meant to be played by the players, and mappers are free to express their intention however they like it. previous TBs not using it doesn't mean that it can't be used for this one, it gives the map a unique identity. i personally think we are way past the point of standardizing maps according to a set of ideals
After testing, I think the final paragraph of the current version is still too difficult. A certain nerf is required, and some of the issues I have posted in the discussion forum .Will be closed after the difficulty balance is resolved