00:11:930 (11930|0,12080|1,25730|3,25880|2,26030|1) - i dont see why these are here, as well as they are ending a measure earlier than 00:26:180 , in my opinion this is unnecessary and there isnt much validity to why is this used
I also don't understand the above, but I'm writing back because I want to mod the 00:11:780 (11780|0) - part.
00:07:280 (7280|3) - you used 1/1 LN for this part, thus I think it's right to use 1/1 LN for this part (00:11:780) as well (in consistency). what do you think?
and i think 00:26:180 is not problem.
Please reopen the discussion again if the modder can elaborate further.
I don't think it'd be right, 00:11:780 (11780|0) has the guitar a lot more audible, while 00:11:780 is barely there. As for consistency 00:11:780 has a diferent rhythm because it starts a tick earlier than 00:11:780 so I personally don't think it would make much sense. (I'll resolve this mod for now, feel free to reopen again if anybody understands the first mod or has something to add)
00:45:380 (45380|0,45530|1,45680|2,45830|3,45980|2,46130|1,46280|0,46430|1,46580|2) - i think these cases on short long notes on the melody should be switched to single rice notes, and 00:46:580 (46580|0,47780|2,50180|0) - chord additions should become long notes instead
00:54:380 (54380|3) - this should be kept 1/2 length like 00:56:780 (56780|0,56930|1,57080|2,57230|3) - ?
00:54:980 (54980|0,55280|0,55580|2,55730|2) - things like this create weird ln-shield kinda stuff, i think moving the objects around (for example 00:55:430 (55430|2,55580|0) ) should fix the problems
01:26:480 (86480|2,86555|1,86630|2,86705|1) - weird trill and 01:26:180 (86180|3,86330|3,86480|3,86630|3,86780|3,86930|3,87080|3) - omega anchor
01:36:380 (96380|3,96380|0,96380|1,96455|0,96530|1,96530|2,96530|3,96605|3,96680|2,96680|0,96680|1,96755|1,96830|0,96830|3,96830|2,96905|2,96980|3,96980|0,96980|1,97055|2,97130|3,97130|0,97130|1) - minijack hell, please, dont, you can use graces as they are probably better to play and also the transition between 01:36:230 (96230|2,96230|0,96230|3,96380|3,96380|1,96380|0) - is really lackluster
01:51:530 (111530|3,111530|0,111605|0,111605|3) and 01:51:755 (111755|0,111755|3,111830|3,111830|0) - should diverge because the entire section is focused on 1-4 column and not balanced further or back
02:04:580 (124580|1,124580|0,124655|2,124730|3,124805|1,124880|3,124880|2,124880|0,124955|1,125030|3,125105|0,125180|2,125180|3,125255|1,125330|0,125405|2,125480|0,125480|1,125480|3,125555|2,125630|0,125705|3,125780|1,125780|0,125855|2,125930|3,126005|1,126080|3,126080|2,126080|0,126155|1,126230|3,126305|0,126380|2,126380|3,126455|1,126530|0,126605|2) - unbalanced difficulty wise compared to previous sections, this is like light insane, while the previous parts are expert+
02:42:380 (162380|0,162530|0,162680|0,162830|0,162980|0,163130|0,163280|0,163430|0) - omega long anchor, balance section will fix
03:12:230 (192230|2,192230|3,192380|3,192380|2,192530|2,192530|3,192680|2,192680|3,192830|3,192830|2,192905|2,192980|3,193055|2,193205|2,193280|3,193280|2,193430|3,193430|2) - this whole section is really hard on 3&4 columns making the 1&2 columns underused and shifting balance to right hand
There seems to be an incorrect position of the LN in the part 04:50:180 to 04:59:780.
04:50:705 (290705|0,290705|1) - -> 04:50:630 (290630|2,290630|3) - LN move
04:51:905 (291905|3,291905|2) - -> 04:51:830 (291830|0,291830|1) - same
04:53:030 (293030|0,293030|3) - -> 04:53:030 (293030|0,293030|3) - same
04:54:305 (294305|2,294305|1,294455|1) - -> 04:54:305 (294305|2,294305|1,294455|1) - same
04:55:505 (295505|0,295505|1) - -> 04:55:430 (295430|3,295430|2) - same
04:56:705 (296705|2,296705|3) - -> 04:56:630 (296630|0,296630|1) - same
04:57:830 (297830|0,297830|3) - LN add
04:58:955 (298955|1,298955|0) - -> 04:59:030 (299030|2,299030|3) - LN move
This way, the LN is exactly where the emphasis is in the music.
06:30:980 (390980|1,390980|0) - why double? this part is same 00:06:980, but you not used note this part. Also, I don't think it's sound enough to use Double. I think single is right for this part