Shizuka na Yoru ni mapped by AndreyChomik‬ · beatmap discussion‬ | ‭osu!‬

beatmap discussion

7

mapped by AndreyChomik

submitted 26 Jun 2024

last updated 8 Jan 2025

This beatmap wasn't updated since 8 January 2025 so it was graveyarded...

New Discussion

Please sign in to post or reply

Discussions

00:01:926

00:01:926 (1926|1,1926|2) - tbh i didn't here kick here so maybe you should make it single?

8 months ago

to have a comparison with 00:01:759 (1759|3,1759|0) - which stonger

8 months ago

00:07:259 (7259|1,7259|0) -

8 months ago

00:07:926 (7926|2,7926|1) -

8 months ago

00:01:926 (1926|1,1926|2) - only

5 months ago

Marked as resolved by AndreyChomik

00:05:842

00:05:842 missed note for drums? compare 00:03:176

8 months ago

no drums, u compared it with very basic and obvious drums

5 months ago

Marked as resolved by AndreyChomik

00:06:759

00:06:759 (6759|1) - small suggestion, move to col 1 to provide chord complexity from 00:06:092 (6092|2,6092|1) -

8 months ago

its fine

5 months ago

Marked as resolved by AndreyChomik

00:13:592

00:13:592 (13592|0,13592|3,13592|2,13926|2,13926|3,13926|0,14426|3,14426|0,14426|2,14926|2,14926|3,14926|0) - suggest rearrange the jacks a bit, the placement is a bit monotonous atm

8 months ago

wdym by monotonous? it feels fine as intended for snare sound

5 months ago

Marked as resolved by AndreyChomik

00:29:676

00:29:676, 00:35:009 - missing single notes?

8 months ago

other ye

8 months ago

Marked as resolved by AndreyChomik

00:33:092

00:33:092 (33092|3) - for comfortability u can just move this to col 2, the jack and the ln release on RH is jarring

8 months ago

I did smth other

5 months ago

Marked as resolved by AndreyChomik

00:34:759

00:34:759 (34759|2,34842|1,34926|0,34926|3) - actually i did'nt here 1/4 sounds so im a little confused that why here use 1/4 note

8 months ago

00:52:509 (52509|3) -

8 months ago

hihat

8 months ago

Marked as resolved by AndreyChomik

00:45:759

00:45:759 - it has same sound with 00:47:092 but its double

8 months ago

l

8 months ago

Marked as resolved by AndreyChomik

00:49:259

00:49:259 - idk why here use tirple because i think sounds here is obvious weaker than 00:49:426 - but you use triple instead

8 months ago

and the whole part has the same situation which what i said

8 months ago

the rhythm i heard is xxx , xx , xxx , xx . but you make them all xxx,xxx,xxx,xxx

8 months ago

intended for kiai itself

5 months ago

Marked as resolved by AndreyChomik

00:49:259

00:49:259 (49259|2,49259|0,49259|3) - 00:49:926 (49926|3,49926|1,49926|0) - 00:59:926 (59926|0,59926|3,59926|1) - 01:00:592 (60592|2,60592|0,60592|3) - and other repetitive parts. should be doubles like 01:01:926 (61926|3,61926|0,62259|3,62259|1,62259|2,62592|2,62592|1,62926|3,62926|1,62926|0,63259|0,63259|3) - etc

2 months ago

00:57:092

00:57:092 (57092|2,57092|3,57092|1,57592|2,57592|1,57592|3) - you can use different kind of chord placement on this one, as both has different vocals
rearrange things around after fixing this

8 months ago

rearranged lil bit

5 months ago

Marked as resolved by AndreyChomik

01:07:592

01:07:592 (67592|1,67759|1,67926|1,68092|1) - this anchor is too long? just move 01:07:926 (67926|1) - to col 4 to fix thatr

8 months ago

01:12:092 (72092|1,72259|1,72426|1,72592|1) - this one too;

8 months ago

oh ye bor

5 months ago

Marked as resolved by AndreyChomik

01:11:926

01:11:926 - u should change to triple

8 months ago

e

8 months ago

Marked as resolved by AndreyChomik

01:30:842

01:30:842 (90842|1,90926|3,90926|2,91009|1,91092|2,91176|3,91259|2,91259|1) - this part is quite calm, i dont feel this much strain is necessary

8 months ago

ur example is little right-biased, did smth other

5 months ago

Marked as resolved by AndreyChomik

01:34:926

01:34:926 - u should change to double

8 months ago

e

8 months ago

Marked as resolved by AndreyChomik

02:19:259

02:19:259 ~ 02:26:926 - how about expressing the guitar sound in 1/4 LN

8 months ago

dont like that idea ssry

8 months ago

Marked as resolved by AndreyChomik

02:45:426

02:45:426 (165426|0,165759|0,166092|0,166426|0,166759|0) - too many notes in col 1 on red line, move 02:46:092 (166092|0) - to col 4 and 02:46:759 (166759|0) - to col 2?

8 months agoLast edited by kartofle 8 months ago.

02:49:759 (169759|0,170092|0,170426|0,170759|0) - this too lol, yea just move things around

8 months ago

i dont find it a problem so ye

5 months ago

Marked as resolved by AndreyChomik

03:00:759

03:00:759 add a note for kick

8 months ago

03:36:509 same for continuity

8 months ago

03:00:759 - only

5 months ago

Marked as resolved by AndreyChomik

03:12:259

03:12:259 ~ 03:12:592, 03:34:592 ~ 03:34:926 - they have the same sounds, but why they dont have the same notes

8 months ago

density stuff

8 months ago

Marked as resolved by AndreyChomik

03:28:759

03:28:759 (208759|3) - bring this to col 2, think it would be better cuz the triple anchor is hit with different hand than the ln 03:28:592 (208592|2) -

8 months ago

its preference, but ok

5 months ago

Marked as resolved by AndreyChomik

/

›

›

›

›