when i go (feat. thao nguyen)

00:25:589 (1) - Would start at 00:26:228 - instead to match the vocal, the current timestamp does not contain any sound.

01:03:409 (8) - that's the only antiflow you've added move it to the right instead

01:11:547 (1) - idk how did the droplets developed into a shapen angle but try to curve it nicely

01:13:621 (4,5,6) - 1.36x spacing is prolly too large here. There is no strong sound here as compared to 01:12:504 -

01:17:451 (4,5,6) - the jump sounds like on 4->5 rather than 5->6

01:20:323 (6,7) - make distance larger, so you get a structure separation between 01:19:845 (3,4,5,6) - and 01:20:483 (7,1,2,3) - . Now these 8 nodes just blend all the way together, from which I cannot tell how it represents the music.

01:20:569 (1) - remove clap and add whistle

01:25:270 (3,4,5) - 01:25:749 (6,7,8) - distance better be larger. 0.86x DS feels underwhelmed here given that you use 1.2x DS just for some normal movement, e.g., 01:24:313 (1,2) -.

01:26:547 (3,4) - maybe reduce this jump as the music strength here is not really worth 1.54x spacing to me

01:30:782 (3,4) - Is it intentional to leave it as a walk though, think hdash would be neat here for the clap considering that the 3/4 sliders have just whistle and aren't that strong unlike (4)

01:34:931 (3,4,5) - probably you can reduce these dashes a bit, the song is still remaining pretty calm

01:35:090 (4,5) - Would add hdash here, that's the only moment where clap isn't followed by an hdash unlike 01:32:537 (4,5) - 01:33:814 (4,5) - etc... so would add

01:36:600 (2,3,4) - both pitch and intensity is going down, so the large movement here feels out of place. Something like https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/18311568/b07c makes more sense if you don't want to change the pattern by too much.

02:14:100 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1,2,3,4) - guys guys guys

02:14:824 (5,6,7,8,1,2,3,4) - try gradually reducing the distances to follow the vocal pitch? would be cool imo

02:19:685 (4) - I'd stacked this with 02:19:366 (2) to give that dash more intensity

02:30:536 shouldn't there be a note in between (51) and (1) to follow that vocal?

02:48:016 (3,4,5,6,1,2) - use sliders here as well for the consistency with previous ones?

02:49:931 (1,2) - Could reduce slightly, not that mean indeed but will still be safe with a weaker distance

02:52:238 (6) - x:16 as destination of hyperdash, to comply with Guideline in Ranking Criteria:

"Dashes and hyperdashes should not be used when the destination of the dash or hyperdash is located near the left or right border of the playfield. This creates an uncomfortable movement as the catcher is forcibly stopped upon reaching the border of the playfield (x:16 on the left and x:496 on the right)."

02:53:355 (1,2,3,4) - why not making it a curved stream?

03:00:696 - Could remove the early end of the break section, i.e. scroll the blue thing to the right until it disappears

03:01:334 (5,1) - swap NC and add NC at 03:02:451 (7)

03:02:930 (5,6) - weird antiflow after (4) just ctrl+h

03:07:165 - clap, not whistle

03:08:122 (2,3) - I think an reduction would be worth as 03:07:803 (1,2) - is an antiflow that would avoid to make a miss with less time reaction

03:09:718 (3,4) - I don't think double hdash is needed here, it feels like a bit overdone considering tone isn't that strong and to be fair something like 03:09:080 (1,2) - would be neat as both are similar

03:21:846 (1) - should be snapped in 1/2, 1/7 doesn't seem to be intentional

03:30:622 (8,1) - Has a different sound from other ones, maybe change shape of 03:30:782 (1,2) - for more creativity but optional

04:02:611 (7) - NC?

04:12:823 (1,2) - weird dash in between these objects can (2) be hdash instead? it's a bit uncomfy to predict I think

04:50:385 (4) - This is currently wrongly snapped, having it at the 1/12 on 04:50:412 - is more accurate.

05:24:313 (9) - NC before spinner?

05:24:614 (1) - Would be nice to slowly decrease the volume in the duration of the spinner? Having 25% is quite loud when the ending is almost fully silent.