but 00:01:613 (3) - and 00:05:305 (3) - are not using distance snap? these are well above 2x distance snap when you've pretty much been using 1.5 here
will also add that the spacing between 00:05:613 (4,5) - seems a little jarring, just use 1.5 ds like you've been doing since i dont see any reason to change
00:14:074 (2) - seems like your ds got messed up here, might've been an accident but i don't see any reason to change ds all of a sudden
00:20:382 (2) - why not map with 2 circles like in 00:19:459 (2,3) - . Better to be consistent
ncs on this diff are pretty consistent for the most part so i'm not gonna make a general post, but i'll still point out a bit of inconsistencies here and there
00:28:843 (1) - you've been ncing the downbeats consistently in this section so just remove this nc for consistency
00:45:459 (1) - same as above but nc this 00:45:920 (2) - instead
01:10:536 (1,2) - same ^
01:15:459 (2) - would nc for the 3/1 gap
00:59:766 - this section of the song is pretty similar to 00:11:766 so i don't see any reason to change the ncing here
00:37:613 to 00:44:997 - i'm not sure why this section's sv is higher than the rest of the map even though this is the least intense part of the song. i kinda get it for the buildup at 00:41:305 but i still think the sv doesn't need to be this high here, it just creates a bit of contrast issues
imo you should be using something around 0.75 from the first timestamp and building up from that at 00:41:305