01:23:101 (1,2,3) - weird angle for the 1/3 given that 01:20:639 (1,2,3) - and 01:21:870 (1,2,3) - were more directly following the circular flow.
rotating it so that it turns clockwise would probs feel better (also the sharp angle kinda sux but w/ever)
01:43:562 (2) - would've just stuck to the rhythm you used with 01:42:075 (5,1) - , this kinda ruins the hard impact of the 1/3 jump. you could easily match the change in the song by just mapping 01:43:716 - actively after