00:10:377 (1) - could remove two repeats from this and add a triple on 00:10:795 (2) - this instead, fits a bit nicer that way
same goes for 00:12:609 (1) - 00:14:842 (1) - 01:36:330 (1) - 01:38:563 (1) - 01:40:795 (1) - 01:43:028 (1) - 01:45:260 (1) - these
00:16:656 (5) - wanna nc this? your NC structure seems to focus on voice, and later you always nc those return sliders. so maybe you forgot on this one
this doesn't follow the vocals anymore though, or there would've been something else on 00:16:237 (7) - since i'm not following the vocals anymore i think it's fine
00:18:051 (1,2,3,4,1,2,1,2) - this jump sections' structure doesn't look rly good, especially this 00:18:330 (3) - which can also lead to reading issues. I'd suggest to put that only circle a bit lower, down the small previous stream.
00:22:516 (1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2,1) - i'm a big fan of this jump pattern dude
however you could represent the song better by doing the same stack here 00:23:772 (2,2) -, on 00:22:656 (2,2) - maybe? also moving those 00:23:214 (2,2) - if you apply. i find that fitting better imo
jsp si t'as compris c'que j'ai voulu dire xD sob
the overlaps are here to indicate the decreasing pitch, since the pitch remains the same on 00:23:632 (1,2,1,2) - i stacked those perfectly instead
00:29:214 (1,2,1,2,3) - really overwhelming use of spacing here. you mapped the other same part with a bigger spacing here 00:38:144 (1,2,1,2,3) - so it breaks the consistency. consider increase the spacing of the kicksliders maybe :thinking:
please take a look at my suggestion here https://meftlyy.s-ul.eu/LK6CEec2.jpg
00:37:865 (7) - NC? according to that 00:36:749 (1) - and plenty other ncs u did, which makes emphasis on voice
00:51:260 (1) - i don't think this needs a new combo, removing it would make more emphasis here 00:51:539 (1) -