00:06:269 (6269|0) - would be nice if u can use a LN here like you did at 00:05:533 (5533|3) - they are basically identical sound
yeah that works, i only had a LN on the other one since it was a much louder drum roll but this fine too
00:09:582 I would suggest to make these LNs to Single notes 1/2 semi jacks/stacks instead just like what you did on your next patterns because on this part the drumbeat with piano has a strong point. http://puu.sh/ABPIh.png
now i think about it, yeah ok. i originally was sort of on the fence about this cuz i didnt want the SR to rise any more than it has (lol) but whatever, i think you're totally right about this.
00:09:950 (9950|3,9950|0) - Little suggestion here. You could make this chord here a [12] one. I don't think it increases the difficulty by a lot, taking into account that you have a 1/1 break right after it. Even when the next jacks are on the same hand like the chord, it plays pretty nice and gives a lot of emphasis to the sound it represents.
00:12:895 (12895|2,13079|2,13263|0) - Re-arrange this part moving 00:13:079 to |1| the stack sound resonates at here (Red line) it's better for this here to be stacked than the previous note (C) because of it's sound because it has almost the same beat.
00:15:840 (15840|2,16024|3,16208|3) - Not sure if this is intentionally or just missed. But in this part, all previous notes before the jacks (Example: 00:12:895 (12895|1) - , 00:14:368 (14368|2) - , 00:17:312 (17312|3) - etc.) were always played with the other hand than the following jacks. I think you could keep that pattern and move either 00:15:840 (15840|2) - to 1 or you make a CTRL+H with these: 00:15:472 (15472|1,15840|2) -
00:17:496 Move to |4| the stack sound resonates at here (Red line) then 00:17:864 (17864|2,18049|1) - re-arrange these two notes to |1| - |3| accordingly to make it balance and consistent.
You can refer it here (your next pattern) 00:29:091
00:22:650 - I guess you might miss a beat sound here, since this is really same with 00:22:282 (22282|3) - and I think it's necessary to keep same setting at least one section.
00:23:570 (23570|1) - u may move to 4 to make a mirror pattern from 00:22:834 (22834|0,23018|3) - , pretty neat
00:41:791 (41791|0) - since the layering here was kick+drum oriented, i will suggest to remove this and make a space here
agreed, moved 00:41:607 (41607|2) - to column 1 after deletion
01:10:318 (70318|3,71055|2) - Maybe you could do a CTRL+G here? It feels a bit odd to have 01:10:687 (70687|0,71055|2) - these two be mapped like the trill starting from 01:11:423 - . Feels better because a different musical part begins
01:14:368 - ,it's no wrong with the current pattern but I wanna say, you can here the music here is a cycle within 3 notes. Check the Normal diff, so your setting [1]-[2]-[3]-[1]-[4]-[2]-[3]-[4] will be divide into, most likely, [123]-[14]-[234] (3-2-3), but actually it's (3-3-2), so you can modified the pattern I think
kinda like how i did it imo but i moved 01:15:656 (75656|0) - to column 1 so its not in the cycle of 3 notes.
also i moved 01:16:024 (76024|1) - to column 4 so the patterns aren't too left-handed and one-sided
01:14:736 (74736|0) - I am a bit unsure about this note here. While i get your intention, i have the feeling it would suit better 1/2 up on 01:14:920 - . It feels wrong to leave out this very loud snare
01:15:840 (75840|1,76208|0,76576|2,76944|1) - these notes are placed in a completely wrong rhythm, what I would do to fix is this: https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/11289815 (basically add a note on 01:15:656 - and snap the other notes to the drums)
why doubled here 01:18:049 (78049|3,78233|3) - but not 01:18:049 (78049|3,78233|3) - , as for me, I think they are same
hm im not sure why i would double here, considering that this 00:31:300 (31300|1) - is the same sound and no double here too. no change.