00:18:096 (3,4,5) - this transition feels kinda weird rythmically because in the previous section 00:18:096 (3,4,5) - clicking pattern seems to consistently follow piano hits. It would feel betetr if the 4 note transition here 00:18:096 (3,4,5) - would be mapped as circles also, so that you keep the same logic that is, piano note = mouse click.
I didn't realize that there were the sounds, thanks for pointing it out!
00:35:840 (5,6,7,8,9,10) - would probably be better if all of these were hitsounded with snares. Right now your hitsounding indicates a different rythm from what the song plays and what you map.
00:44:072 (3) - This slider is mapped passive for no good reason. Vocals are putting emphasis on the slider's end, so it would make more sense to have that clickable
01:02:730 (1) - I suggested to separate into 3/4 slider and 1/2 slider because you follow vocal in this part, and this reverse slider missed vocal sound on white tick.
01:06:754 (3,1,1,1) - Perfectly overlapping sliders must disappear before the next slider comes up.
The patterns are not that hard to read, and there is nothing wrong with them being imperfectly overlapping sliders.
01:07:852 (1) - could you show more slider body for this slider? This slider nearly hided by
01:07:486 (1) -
01:13:705 (3) - what do you think about whisteling this? I think your current hitfinish is relatively weak and doesn't represent the intensity of the note
01:22:303 (4,5,6) - I think you can make a straight stream instead of curving because it looks weird with the slider 01:22:669 (7) - . Flowing is important, but 01:22:669 - this beat can be emphasized by using flowing break.
01:43:522 (1) - flowing here is important becasue:
01:43:522 (1) - is not also strong beat, not need to strongly emphasized this beat.
01:43:705 (2) - is not needed to emphasized too much. You follow vocal here, then it is not that suitable to sudden switch to beat