00:52:813 (7) - The additive rhythm sounds kinda too odd. Tbh would stick to 1/2 cus it's a super chill song and u can tell there's nothing in there by just listening to it. If you really wanna keep it, at least passive would fit better imo
really want to keep them for more diverse and fun tapping since the song is very repetitive + these triples give more emphasis for this high pitched pluck synth
fyi i didn't do this for 00:50:130 (1,2), 01:10:340 (1,2) and etc for tapping variety as i said
00:57:708 (4,5,1,2,3,4,5,6) - Could nc this as 00:47:603 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3) - for better grouping representation
yep, this one based around patterning and i use such new combo ""gimmicks"" to separate patterns like 01:17:918 (1,2,1,2,3), 01:48:234 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7) (nothing so separate, so no new combos here) and the ones you've mentioned
01:52:655 (3) - Could remove this so you could solely focus on the main melody, which imo is a better option. Otherwise you could map 01:52:340 - 01:52:971 - these too so the change of layer wouldn't feel so weird. Imo a 1/2 repeat at 01:52:340 - would be great too
it's the same pluck synth with delay here, it's more quiet, so i don't use any sliders that add movement here + lowered spacing between 01:51:076 (2,3,1) and 01:53:603 (2,3,1) to emphasize the intensity drop (is this even acceptable to say about this song??)