is there any reason this is bad aside from "its the same pattern repeated", the 1-2 parts are following the same repeated rhythm, the 1-2-3-4 are following another repeated rhythm, i cant see a mapping reason to force pattern variety aside from "its stupid/pp abuse" despite this already tanking a -10% nerf and very likely going to be even more nuked whenever next deploy drops
i'm not saying you need to delete the difficulty from the set, i'm just asking for at least some variety in jump patterns instead of reusing the same thing over and over. even adding one or two variations would work fine -- star jumps are honestly easier to play at this BPM and would work decently well with the same gradual spacing concept
is there any reason this is bad aside from "its the same pattern repeated"
i cant see a mapping reason to force pattern variety aside from "its stupid/pp abuse" despite this already tanking a -10% nerf and very likely going to be even more nuked whenever next deploy drops
because it's boring as fuck to play lol
if you're incredibly insistent on keeping this as is, i'm not gonna veto (if i'm gonna be honest i genuinely just can't be arsed and i'd probably get death threats for doing so anyways), but this is super disappointing to see from mappers that i know can make better maps than this.
because it's boring as fuck to play lol
obviously im not flaming the mappers because they can do what they want, but if we're gonna start posting about maps being boring or repetitive then i would start posting problem stamps on every single 3-4* low bpm single diff sleepathon that looks the exact same and also does not make use of any more engaging patterning than what this diff does
i find this map fun the same way i find ur 2019 vertical spam maps fun, it doesnt need to be less repetitive for your own tastes only, you may just not be the target audience for this diff
the only semi valid reason to have complaints over repetitive patterning on this would be concern over it being pp abuse (even if i dont agree in mappers' or bns' agency with regulating it)
knowing that this specific type of patterning has not only already been nerfed, but that maps like it will continue to get nerfed with pretty much every high priority pp rework proposal at the moment, should be the moment where this semi valid reason for posting something disappears
not allowing this type of stuff to go through after the bulk of the issue with them is gone will result in history repeating itself with years of backwards thinking on what makes a map overweighted and in worsening the enjoyment of the game for a large portion of players
not allowing this type of stuff to go through after the bulk of the issue with them is gone will result in history repeating itself with years of backwards thinking on what makes a map overweighted and in worsening the enjoyment of the game for a large portion of players
man are you even looking at the comments on this map, this is already becoming unenjoyable for a pretty sizeable amount of people because there's zero quality standards now
if we're genuinely accepting maps like this as "ranked" worthy then that is an insane fall from grace even from 2019 standards (which, mind you, had several vetoes related to these types of maps, and i was forced to change quite a bit from how my maps in that era were originally made!)
you can say "i'm not the target audience" all you want, but with all sincerity, who's the target audience here? people who flail their cursor around and get rewarded due to CSR? because that's basically all the plays on these types of maps amount to. you can try to separate the pp system from this discussion, but players are going to play what gives them pp, so if you're bringing in "what players want", of course they're gonna be playing this -- because it's fucking broken lol
i already discussed this a bit with you in DM and i know we aren't ever going to see eye to eye on this, but this is way too idealized of a worldview
honestly kind of feel like i'm just repeating myself from a multitude of different threads on this exact topic at this point so i'm just gonna leave it at that
again -- if you really want to keep this as it is, whatever, i'm not gonna push further, mostly because i'm genuinely scared of how the community will react to a veto on this, especially if it's from me. the fact i even have to worry about that is kinda sad, but it is what it is
01:06:762 (4,1) - this flow is really bad please space (1) out more n rotate smth like this https://prnt.sc/RYesRgYyOb2L
01:07:283 (2,3) - 01:08:588 (2,3) - 01:09:370 (2,3) - imo this part doesnt have to reduce intensity that much around here, could have similar intensity to 01:15:240 (1,2,3,4) - part