Mugen Shitto Gekijou "666" mapped by _koishi1‬ · beatmap discussion‬

beatmap discussion

mapped by _koishi1

submitted 27 Nov 2024

ranked 25 Jan 2025

Beatmap Page

This beatmap was ranked on 25 January 2025!

nominated by Flask and Electoz

New Discussion

Please sign in to post or reply

Discussions

melae

Really love this map actually, but 02:43:938 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,1,2,1,2,1,1,1,2,1,1,2,1,1) - this part really feels like too much imo. It feels incredibly challenging reading wise & movement wise on 02:45:703 (1,2,1,1,1,2,1,1,2,1) - and density wise on the stream here 02:43:938 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,1) -.

I think if the map had implemented some reading challenge or dense rhythms before this point, it would've been completely fine, but currently, the problem with this is how sudden it is, the concept of the fast sv and stuff suits the video and song really nicely but I think the way the objects are placed makes this too challenging and really takes away from the extra challenge where the song climaxes on 04:00:087 -.

Would suggest to bring down the density of the rhythms on 02:43:938 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,1) - and rearrange the sliders at 02:45:703 (1,2,1,1,1,2,1,1,2,1) - to maybe overlap (in a way to remove the awkward linear movement) so that the concept is still there but the section isn't so difficult.

Congrats on the first ranked btw, this is a really good map to first rank on.

2 months agoLast edited by melae 2 months ago.

permalink

wafer

i thought both were okay personally,

for 02:43:938 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,1) -

theres bursts established earlier in the map (i.e, 00:53:767 (3,4,5,6,7) - ) and theres a pretty constant use triples and 1/4 rhythms

for 02:45:703 (1,2,1,1,1,2,1,1,2,1) -

the overlapping vs the non overlapping sliders helps indicate what rhythms are here, and while i agree 02:46:056 (1) - could probably be nerfed a littttle spacing wise , it seems fine to me

2 months ago

permalink

Plus4j

feels fine for me as well

2 months ago

permalink

Flask

think this doesn't have to be changed, now the pattern is completely acceptable and pretty much predictable

2 months ago

permalink

_koishi1

ima say no to this suggestion
02:43:938 part feel pretty fine to me

i can see why 02:45:703 (1,2,1,1,1,2,1,1,2,1) feel maybe slightly too much, but i think it still ok
the difficulty spike look fine cus the pattern is still predictable
i think it dont make the 3rd kiai look less hype cus the 3rd kiai is still alot harder especially when it last very long too, 02:45:703 last very short and the scary song in dat part only appear once

2 months ago

permalink

melae

okk, will close thanks for discussion

2 months ago

permalink

Marked as resolved by melae

Flask

01:52:643 - ~ 02:01:113 - think you should make your rhythm choices more inline with the percussion in this section, as these percussion are more irregular comparing to other sections and sort of overtake the vocal

right now the rhythm is mostly following the vocal which feels ignoring what's happening in the music imo

take 01:52:643 - ~ 01:54:054 - as example, a fix would be ↓ as it's mainly following percussion, and some vocals are even sacrificed to make it more cohesive: