00:05:108 (1,2,3,4,1) - 00:21:810 (4,1) - Wouldn't it be better to avoid overlaps? I know it's the beginning, but it's not a weak song, so I don't think it's necessary to overlap.
01:22:945 (1) - you should probably lower this spacing, it's kinda huge compared to any other 1/2 spacings you have, especially since you have 4 active 1/2 in a row here
01:35:594 (4,5,6) - could move it a bit to like x: 185 y: 300 cuz 01:34:621 (3,4) and 01:35:918 (6,7) are more visually similar to 01:37:216 (9,10). alternatively, you can just stack 01:37:216 (9,10)
if you decide to stack, also stack 01:40:945 (5,6), 01:42:405 (7,8), 01:47:594 (9,10), 01:51:324 (5,6), 01:52:783 (7,8) for consistency
01:57:972 (2,3,4,5) - It's the same stack, but the rhythm is different, which makes it harder to read. 01:58:621 (4,5) - Wouldn't it be better not to stack?
02:14:837 (1,2) - tbh this pause here feels quite off, you could put a circle at 02:15:324, it would feel more natural