mapped by -Doge-
submitted
ranked
This beatmap was ranked on 4 February 2025!
nominated by NeKroMan4ik and -kevincela-
New Discussion
Please sign in to post or reply
Discussions
Sort by

00:41:231 (1,2) - would find a way to space these two sliders up, considering the shift in intensity (and SV) I think giving it some more punch may be epic

permalink

changed slider pattern

permalink
Marked as resolved by -Doge-

00:59:828 (4,5,6,7,8) - not a big deal but I was expecting this to be larger because this looks like something belonging to the slow part despite the song progressing

permalink

changed

permalink
Marked as resolved by -Doge-

01:06:508 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13) - , 01:12:286 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13) - , 01:18:063 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13) - , 01:23:841 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13) - if you decided to overmap the song at least it would be nice if you followed it with movement changes on red ticks like you did with 01:15:174 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,1) -

permalink

I don't believe this is overmapped, as you can hear 1/4 sounds on every tick at 01:06:508 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13) - etc., which support these patterns. They’re also not a long chain of circles or an extended stream, which would more accurately be considered overmapping.

The movement changes suggestion are a nice idea, but given the current structure of the section, implementing them would require a remap that isn't worth it, imo. As for 01:15:174 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12) - I intentionally made this different, since the melody repeats twice (01:05:064 - 01:16:619), and I wanted this "re-enter" stream to stand out, similar to how I handled the last one at 01:26:730 to close the map.

permalink
Marked as resolved by -Doge-

you can also notice that 01:15:174 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12) - is different not just due to the movement change but also because it has two 1/4 sliders at the end, supporting the idea I mentioned

permalink
/