mapped by iamadumhead
submitted
last updated
Hype Train3 / 5
New Discussion
Please sign in to post or reply
Discussions
Sort by

00:25:400 (4,1,2,3) - I believe the beginning was principally following the vocals, but this slider 00:25:719 (1) - is emphasizing the piano. What about following one layer here and offering a little break time?

  • 00:25:400 (4,1) - Switch these two objects with CTRL+G then remove the circle.
  • 00:26:358 (5,6) - Switch these two objects with CTRL+G then add a reverse arrow to the slider.
permalink

for the part at 00:26:358 i did a 1/1 slider instead to be consistent with 00:21:890 (2) since i feel that a 1/2 reverse + circle followed by 00:26:996 (1,2,3) might be too intense for the this part of the song

would replacing 00:25:400 (4,1) with a 1/1 reverse slider to passively map the piano work instead, since i also passively mapped the piano in later sections? i'm not sure if i like the 2/1 break there

permalink
Marked as resolved by iamadumhead

I like what you've done, and the reverse at 00:25:400 (1) - works pretty well too!

permalink

00:28:432 (1,2) - 00:35:453 (3,4) - 00:42:156 (6,1) - Should be stacked similar to how your other 1/2 gaps after circles are handled (e.g. 00:35:453 (3,4) - 00:45:188 (2,3) - )

permalink

yeah ig ill stack all 1/2 circles before sliders to be consistent (so perhaps #4877110 would be less of an issue?)

permalink
Marked as resolved by iamadumhead

00:34:656 (1,2,3,4) - Stacking objects are not a bad idea, but I'm thinking this could be a little confusing because the first circle is not stacked (for obvious reasons..). In this case, I would recommend unstacking objects 3-4. The rhythm choice will be easier to find with 2-3.

permalink

sure

permalink
Marked as resolved by iamadumhead

00:43:113 (3,4) - Nerf this section by removing the circle and adding a reverse arrow. That'll make a clearer distinction for the rhythms landing on red ticks.

permalink

true

permalink
Marked as resolved by iamadumhead

00:52:209 (3,1) - + 02:03:698 (3,1) - Despite the editor showing that the spacing is the same, we need to take into account the SV change which makes the spacing inconsistent. To keep it consistent, these objects should have a difference of 0.82x.

permalink

changing the kiai sv to 1.00 to distance snap the objects at 1x then putting the sv back to 1.10 changes the distance to 0.9x, so i did 0.9x instead (unless i'm missing something?)

permalink
Marked as resolved by iamadumhead

Nope, you're absolutely right LOL.

Changes are well reflected, nj!

permalink

01:01:145 (4,1,2,3) - 02:33:060 (4,5,6,7) - This pattern is confusing to new players due to the similar distance between notes, I suggest spacing the circles apart more

permalink

the triangle is no longer a triangle to be similar to other 3 1/1 circle patterns

permalink
Marked as resolved by iamadumhead

01:31:464 (2) - circle + 1/1 reverse on 01:31:783 - would be nicer so you catch the vocal and let the part without vocals play passive instead

permalink

agreed

permalink
Marked as resolved by iamadumhead

02:16:305 (3) - since its chorus you could turn this into 1/2 + circle instead to have snare on slider tail and make the vocal active too - keeps the intensity up a bit

permalink

true

permalink
Marked as resolved by iamadumhead

02:33:698 (5) - Add a new combo here to keep it consistent with 01:01:783 (1) -

permalink

o yeah

permalink
Marked as resolved by iamadumhead
/