00:36:609 (1,1) - 00:43:609 (3,1,1) - NCs aren't really necessary here tbh, it's just a spacing increase and they're still clearly overlapped so should be perfectly readable as the same rhythm, if anything could have 1 NC on 00:36:498 (3) - to mark the higher spaced triple but doesn't need the double NC
00:59:377 (1,1) - i think its a bit awkward to only have one 1/8 double here, would also make 00:59:155 (3) - into one, so that it feels more intentional and so that the player can prepare for more later
01:00:054 (2) - Should have all of these as 1/8s instead, there's not really any diff between these that calls for different rhythms, maybe smth like https://i.imgur.com/VvMV9U7.png could work
01:18:266 (1) - 01:21:821 (2) - i get the idea for these but i think progression would be more appropriate if you made these into 1/4 sliders that worked as tapping breaks for the player as this whole section is really tense throughout. would work towards making the 2nd chorus stand out more if you chilled out a bit here
01:45:544 (1,1,1,1) - these two here feel a bit forced compared to the rest bc the kicks don't follow the doubles' rhythm (unlike 01:53:321 (1,1,1,1,1,1)), and theres the very loud guitar on 1/2 rhythm instead, should change this to follow that
03:24:276 (12,13,1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - Should do something a bit different with these just to differentiate these so they stand out some more in their own isolated part w/o with added instrumentals instead of being the same triples used throughout the whole section, just a simple shape change or maybe triangles or something would work just fine