00:16:051 (1) - Should be something different here since the sound landed here is not that strong compared to 00:14:309 (1) - 00:14:889 (1) - 00:15:470 (1) - .
01:09:857 (1,2) - Even for purely vocal spacing, still doesn't quite stand out enough visually compared to the 1/1 just before it, would honestly just do super low spacing and overlap these a bit instead, low spacing works for the vocal anyway and also sticks it out from the rest for emphasis sake with how strong the HS on this is
01:56:729 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - 01:58:308 (1,2) - 02:01:465 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - dunno why they are inconsistent since music intensity is similar here but 2nd is not active
01:59:887 (1,2) - violin is pretty strong here, reverse instead active is so underrated imo
02:01:447 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - More of a timing issue than snapping issue here but this is defo 1/4 assuming correct timing, can check with the timing posted in #4759945 for ref if you want
02:02:138 (2,1) - This has similar spacing as 01:58:882 (2,1) - but in difference they have a 1/2 gap, for the one I mentioned first it's a 1/4 gap and it makes it a sudden jump in difficulty, potentially unexpected and could cause reading problems.
Consider nerfing this one jump
02:28:308 (1,2,3) - Pretty underwhelming considering that this is supposed to be built up from 02:25:939 (1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2,3) - .