can you maybe nerf the OD to 7 ~ 7.5? the notelock gotta be crazy cus 300 BPM and dense LN release on fast bpm 💀
01:17:375 (77375|0) -> Since I think 01:17:225 (77225|1,77275|3,77325|1) - is already enough to represent the synth, wouldn't it be better if you dumped the strong kick followed by these notes 01:17:425 (77425|2,77425|3,77525|2,77575|1)? I feel like the trill already represents the synth quite well and that extra note feels a bit unnecessary even if I do get what you're dumping there, but maybe following and dumping the kick can be a little better. If you're accepting this suggestion, a note should be added at 01:17:075.
Other concerns below:
01:18:425 (78425|1,78525|2) - Should probably make a trill, can't see why these shouldn't follow your original layering. 01:21:625 (81625|1,81725|3) - Same.
Will now list some of the notes that should be removed:
01:17:775 (77775|1) -
01:18:575 (78575|3) -
01:18:975 (78975|3) -
01:20:175 (80175|1) -
01:20:575 (80575|0) -
And so on.
Actually gonna reply this one first because i need to explain some idea behind within the layering choice:
The song can be roughly grouped by each fours bars (and commonly it's the length of one musical phrase), and i think you can easily see that the pattern is mostly repeated with just some column changes based on that, for example 01:17:025 - ~ 01:20:225 - , and further just mark bar as A,B,C,D for better explanation
A and C: They're nearly identical (so does the song, so there should be no much i want to say about why they're the same. Only difference is 01:18:675 (78675|2) - compared with 01:17:075 - , and the one at 01:17:075 - is intentionally left out because of start of new section+cymbal
B and D: This two bars are also alike, the only difference is 01:18:425 (78425|1,78475|3,78525|2,78575|3) - vs 01:20:025 (80025|2,80025|3,80125|2) - . And very clear that 01:20:025 (80025|2,80025|3,80125|2) - with a much sharp synth which is reflected by the one hand ln jack pattern there. While for 01:18:425 (78425|1,78475|3,78525|2,78575|3) - to tell the truth it also sounds distinct from other synth so i make something different there, so not following the said 1/1 two hand LN trill, but being replaced by a OH trill 01:18:475 (78475|3,78525|2,78575|3) - instead. Plus is it the only way that can transition smoothly into the next [12] double 01:18:625 (78625|1,78625|0) - without chenging too many things around, think this will answer your second question
Another thing about how i place 1/4s (basically your first question) is that, i'm placing them more according to the pitch rather than focusing on the drum, mainly because you normally hear the melody first so i do think it's a very natural approach to choose layering based on that. And drums are just the same in all places, it will be just no variation if i just follow that static thing. This is the thing that you will notice in other kiai as well about how i choose the expression so it's very important!!!
And to talk about certain pattern,
Also as a side note: remove too many 1/4s would just make the LN part extremely easy compared with rice section, tho i'm not just making it as dense as possible without reason