01:21:059 (2,3) look like it apart of 01:20:459 (1,2,3,1) instead of 01:21:359 (1,2) cus the patterning look the same as 01:20:459 (1,2,3), and also no NC on 01:21:059 (2)
i think you should emphasis the sound on 01:21:059 (2,3,1,2) similiar to wat you did at 01:30:659 (1,2,1,2)
01:22:559 (1) - Could be placed like https://i.imgur.com/tlwA6x0.jpeg to avoid overlap and blanket like you do 01:19:259 (1,1) -
01:33:809 (2,3,4,5) - Spacing is quite low while the song is building up to the climax of the first chorus.
Increasing spacing here or making 01:33:659 (1,2,3,4,5) - increase spacing more gradual would represent the song's intensity more accurately, while also transitioning smoother into 01:34:859 (2,3,4,5) - .
actually it was intended because the drum is low enough to focus on stronger ones instead, and also i thought about having this drum mapped on Top diff to create a better impression that top diff has more “rhythm complexity” (idk any better term here), it could be count as undermapping so if someone else disagree i would begin to map this drums
02:12:659 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1) would be more fitting if you make them slowly increase in spacing cus of the song
or only increase the spacing on 02:12:659 (1,5,1) if the 1st option seem too much