00:24:029 (1,1) - did you want to have the first spinner follow the held vocal, and the 2nd start on the background synth? if so, then might as well commit to the idea and end the 2nd one when the synth end. what u have right now feels like a weird middle ground between both ideas, where it tries to do both at once but ends up doing neither
00:38:134 (1) - you could also remove this nc since it's the end of the phrase that begins here 00:36:878 (5) -
00:46:616 (5,6,7,8,9,10,11,1,2,3,4,5) - the first half the 1/4 jump is too overkill and can cause a break in the stream very easily while the last half specifically this 00:47:401 (11,1) - doesn't have enough momentum and also can easily cause a break in the stream because it's awkward to go into
I would highly suggest having the first half much lower spacing and then have some of that spacing for the last stream so that way it flows nice and matches the song better.
00:46:930 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1) - I think it would be nice it this flowed clockwise instead. You reverse flow direction 00:46:302 (1,2,3,4,5) - here so it would make sense if you also did so 00:46:930 (1) - .
00:49:443 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10) - movement here is kinda strange
00:49:443 (1,2,3,4,5) - this bit is kinda begging to only go counterclockwise but 00:49:443 (1,2,3) - is a triangle going clockwise instead and the flow between 00:50:071 (4,5) - doesnt really feel that great either. something like this https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/19329982/0bae maybe
00:51:328 (8,9) - ctrl+g for these two would be good as well imo. (adjusting implied slider movement after the fact from 00:51:014 (7) - )
used your idea from your example because it felt nice. i adjusted 00:51:014 (7,8,9,10) - a little more to my liking though.
00:51:485 (10,11) - I would change the flow angle on (11) to be more comfortable like ctrl+g and change the spacing accordingly so that way the angle afterwards 00:51:956 (1) - stands out more and also doesn't have so many angle changes for this part and making it feel more challenging than it should here
01:00:909 (7,8) - spacing has been fairly on the higher side and even taking consideration of what you are following, it still feels inconsistent to choose to have it low spacing here as well as having everything so crowded and cluttered here. It would be more consistent to raise the spacing at least
Would probably HS these triples differently 01:03:187 (7) - 01:04:443 (2) -
The impact you're going for with the triples isn't that great with the soft hitnormals. Maybe use drum hitnormals here instead?
01:07:035 (6,7,1,2,3,4) - jump is arbitarty when song is clearly seperate notes into half. I'd suggest you make it grouped like 3-3
also 01:07:035 (6,1) - swap nc
01:08:606 (3,4) - 1/2 slider is more suitable here because there's major snare at 01:08:606 (3) - but no drums at all at 01:08:763 (4) -
01:14:260 (11) - being consistent with 00:54:155 (11) - is fair enough, but i still think its a shame to miss out on the vocal at 01:14:417 -