D.C. ~Da Capo~ Songs Compilation

00:04:462 (1) - might wanna move the head and tail apart so the direction of the slider is more clear

00:13:172 (1) - could probably move it further or give extra rhythm to emphasize the strong instrument cuz ur spacing for 00:10:511 (9,1) - is so large

00:14:623 (8) - nc like u did 00:10:753 (1) - 00:11:720 (1) - etc.

00:21:640 (1,2,3,4,5) - I feel like this one burst is a bit underwhelming with the spacing here when taking into comparison with 00:15:833 (4,5,6) - 00:18:494 (1,2,3,4,5) - etc.

cuz here has higher intensity drums but with less spacing

00:29:140 (4) - 00:36:882 (4) - nc for different instrument section?

00:31:438 - would be nice to follow the vocal here cuz the vocal is really extending but the rhythm doesn't rly represent it

00:31:559 (1,2) - 00:33:011 (1,2) - 01:17:527 (1,2) - swap nc?

00:32:043 (4,5) - changing these 2 to notes would make 00:32:527 (1,2) - feel more obvious where the vocals are going up

00:32:285 (4) - compared with 00:31:559 (4,1) - this seems a bit too close for a 1/1 gap. would suggest moving it a bit farther from 00:32:043 (3) -

00:41:720 (1) - could just remove nc

00:46:559 (2,2) - 00:57:446 (1,3) - 01:22:849 (1,4) - 01:24:543 (2,2) - 04:15:833 (3) - i cant stop myself from telling you that these arent stacked probably

00:59:140 (4) -
00:59:623 (7) - 01:01:075 (6) - 01:51:156 (6) - 02:18:494 (4) - 02:32:043 (5) - 02:47:527 (4) - nc? also all similar instances following this logic

01:08:575 (3,4) - spacing a bit too large

01:10:269 (1,2,3,4,5) - by how sharp and spaced this plays I feel like you can add hitclap on 01:10:390 (2) - and 01:10:632 (4) -

01:16:801 (1,2,3) - feels like you can put them closer to show more contrast on these 3 1/2 sliders by having cursor velocity change from small to large

sth like this

01:25:027 (1,2) - 02:44:382 (1,2) - 03:57:930 (1,2) - subjective I feel like these ones can be put further from each other cuz the cymbal intensity are rly high but the spacing is very underwhelming even though you have the high sv.

it plays exactly like circles due to the way you curve the slider. Players dont even have to move to hit those

01:29:503 (6,7) - ctrl+g rhythm is more intuitive, rn it's kinda not following the music properlly

01:32:043 (1,2) - ctrl+g these would reflect the movement of 01:31:559 (1,2,3) - which sorta fits the music more

01:32:285 (1) - could just unnc cuz the grouping would make more sense this way

01:33:615 (1,2,3) - 04:06:519 (1,2,3) - hmmm flow change a bit too intense, would recommend just put them in the same direction as the music isnt that strong

01:33:978 (1) - 04:06:882 (1) - it's fine to extend the 1/8 cuz the bpm is low enough to not sb it

01:37:849 (1,2,3,4) - would recommend making these the other way cuz it's another section

01:38:817 (2,1) - spacing a bit too big for music

01:54:301 (3,1) - could give these a mirror cuz you have clockwise movement for quite a while 01:52:365 (2,1,2,3,4,1,2) -

02:05:914 (3,1) - spacing a bit too big, could just delete 02:06:277 (1) -

02:15:107 (1,2,3) - not following the vocal on 02:15:470 - is kinda unintuitive and you tend to follow vocals at the start of the kiai so would recommend doing

02:17:406 (1,1) - these nc a bit unecessary like u did 00:57:688 (3,4,5) -

02:37:123 (1,2) - swap nc for you have all 02:37:365 (2,3) - grouped together, 02:39:301 (2,3) - same

02:49:462 (1,2,3,4) - this movement is a bit heavy as it requires a fast back and forth, would recommend making this flow aim so it doesnt create unintentional diff spike

02:49:462 (8) - nc?

02:50:007 (1) - i think u accidentally moved this back by 1/4

02:51:640 (3) - kinda not emphasized enough, could move it further apart

03:08:091 (4) - nc for 1/1 gap

03:08:789 this timeline seems redundant actually I think it is more accurate to just use constant 124bpm

I think you can end slider at 03:12:204 cuz this is closer to where the vocal ends

03:18:253 (5,1) - swap nc for 1/1 measure

03:18:978 (1,2,3) - can be more spaced actually for 3 consecutive cymbals

03:20:914 (1) - not rly worth nc

03:27:688 (2,3,1) - space more perhaps

03:34:220 (1,2,3) - with how linear this plays + distance snapped. its kinda underwhelming to play I think

You could ctrl+j and then do sth like this

03:37:365 (1,2) - would say this is really tricky to read when they're the same direction since the sliders are really close together. would recommand doing reverse directions

03:37:607 (1) - 03:39:543 (1) - 03:40:753 (1) - unnc

03:41:720 (1,2) - could do ctrl+g because right now the flow of 03:41:478 (4,1,2) - is kinda smooth yet the 1/1 gap in between 03:41:478 (4,1) - feels awkward to play in context that you don't have something like this in the rest of the map

03:45:591 (1,2) - ctrl+g these would be the better option cuz the song is kinda flowing here and suddenly changing flow feels out of place

03:45:591 (4) - where's the nc

03:46:438 - missing note?

03:52:849 (4,5) - wanna do the 2 slider pattern here too?

04:01:559 (1,2,3,4,1,1,2) - this is a bit spikey when the music is going into a rather calm section, maybe nerf spacing a bit

woud you like to nc this one 04:02:042

04:16:801 - could make this active to follow instrument like you did 04:09:059 (1,2) -

04:22:849 (1) - probably lower sv so it extends to 04:28:656 - cuz that's where the song audibly ends

04:44:485 (5) - 04:57:038 (7) - nc

04:55:336 (2,3) - spacing looks too much like a 1/4 gap, probably do nc or move it out

05:08:102 (1,2) - could swap nc and nc 05:09:166 (5) - so these are grouped better

05:12:996 (4,5) - this one spacing is kinda underwhelming with this vocal intensity tbh. Could buff it to sth like

05:13:847 (2) - should be kick not snare
05:14:272 (3) - should be snare not kick

05:16:409 (2) - soft clap instead of kick

05:32:145 (1,2,3) - while slowing down movement is an option i think accelerating these might be better as the vocal is going really intense here

05:33:209 (2) - could space out further, it's kinda baby for a 1/2 gap

05:36:187 (3,1) - either swap nc or move 05:36:187 (3) - out cuz 05:35:549 (1,2,3) - this pattern makes it look like everything has the same gap

05:38:740 (3) - kinda underwhelming with the flow 05:38:528 (2,3,1) - plays kinda smooth. Not showing the emphasis on cymbal at 05:38:953 (1) tbh.

Could move to x 380 y 248 instead