Kimi ni Todoke (TV Size)

00:02:330 (3,4,5,1) - this flow seems pretty weird to me

00:04:898 (5) - Is it a necessary note? Not only is there no sound here, but you haven't added a note where it has the same sound at a higher intensity like 00:18:049 - . Just deleting it would work much better imo.

00:06:645 (1,2,3,4,5) - I know you want to fill up the playfield, but these are just like flow aims. Keep the style (aka sharper angles for this one) and use some zig-zags if you can’t think of anything better.

00:11:576 (1) - idk if it was on purpose but this wave feels so wrong
I'd suggest you do something like this https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/18803324/d5dc

00:16:508 (1) - flatten the curve on this slider body so it'll look better with the circles prior like you did right here at 00:19:590 (4,5,1)

00:17:741 - I think it's better to keep the drum sound alive.
like https://i.imgur.com/pU6SHU0.png

00:20:823 (2,3,4) - Ngl the way the slider overlaps the circles looks kinda weird visually, maybe put it with the curve

00:24:522 (6,1) - The aesthetic could be better here, by making the (6) having an equal spacing to both sides of the (1) slider. I would recommend adjusting the (1)’s angle to keep the aesthetic equal.

00:29:453 (5,6,1) - Illuminage Land: I know this
The aesthetic here is pretty awkward. The (1) does not continue the flow with the straight burst at (5,6), but instead turned clockwise a bit. I’ve also encountered this before back when I was making Illuminage Land, so consider getting it fixed with a better curved flow or adjusting the sliders. You did a good job on emphasising the cymbal for 00:40:754 (7,8,9,10,1) using this tho. Similar situation also happens on 00:56:371 (3,4), 01:03:974 (7,1), 01:08:905 (6,7,1), 01:17:946 (4,5,6), where there are no major emphasis points are found.

00:33:563 (3) - spacing could be increased to emphasize the finish

00:37:467 (4,5) - These 2 notes can be placed slightly further left to get a better flow. There’s not much change in the song’s mood there.

00:49:796 (2,3) - flatten the curve on 2 so that it looks a little better visually

00:49:796 (2) - the break of flow here is very strange and abrupt compared to the flow of the rest of this seciton

01:01:713 (3,4,5) - It's a rarely used 3/4 rhythm, so it felt quite odd. I suggest to try similar rhythm like 00:48:563 (4,5,6,7) - for consistent and simple rhytym here.

01:07:467 (1) - a straight slider without the anchor is better imo

01:16:713 (7,8,9,10,11) - Considering drum roll sounds, I suggest trying this rhythm.

01:17:227 (11,1) - please stop this madness! srsly though this diffspike is completely unexpected and would definitely blindside the player.

01:19:076 (2) - Considering how much triplets are used in sections like 01:14:042 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9) - for drum sounds, using triplet overmapping on this part feels pretty off. Just deleting 01:19:076 - 's overmapping would nicer.

01:20:206 (1,2,3,4,1,1) - I would recommend flipping the 5-stream and the note blanketed below. I dunno if you are russian mapping or not, but the flow seems kinda awkward (since the next cymbal is at the second (1) mentioned in the timestamp.

01:20:617 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2) - i feel like it shoud first be 1-2 then a build up
could just fix nc

01:22:261 (1,2,1,2,1,2,1) - I don't think nc all this is necessary