mapped by daemee
submitted
last updated
This beatmap wasn't updated since 10 June 2023 so it was graveyarded...
New Discussion
Please sign in to post or reply
Discussions
Sort by

00:13:515 (4,5) - 00:16:389 (2,3) - 00:19:264 (3,4) - 00:22:138 (2,3) - would be better to stack them together instead of space them out so it have a different pattern from 00:14:234 (2,3) - 00:15:671 (1,2) - 00:19:982 (2,3) - 00:21:419 (4,5) - since they sound differently

permalink

00:26:988 (4,1) - i'm not sure why this spacing very large given the same sound 00:25:012 (3,1) - 00:26:090 (4,1) - has more lower spacing.
Would be better to reduce and match the spacing together.

permalink

resolved

permalink
Marked as resolved by daemee

00:42:617 (1,2,1,2,3,1) - okay clearly both have different pitch of the vocal yet they map in the same spacing. Would be better if you could space them out for high pitch vocal to differentiate both different sound.

permalink

resolved

permalink
Marked as resolved by daemee

00:45:132 (1,2,1,2) - would suggest this rhythm since this shows the prominent vocal very poorly as it uses the slider end to highlight the prominent vocal.

permalink

resolved

permalink
Marked as resolved by daemee

00:55:819 - any reason to skip this kick while you map all of the rest same triplet ? 00:56:090 (2,3,4) - 00:56:449 (5,6,7) - 00:56:808 (8,9,10) - ? A note would be nice to highlight the kick same as other

permalink
/