00:10:046 (3) - the second half of this reverse slider doesn't sound like it's following much. would suggest changing the rhythms so it represents the music more accurately.
e.g. https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/18445294/d578
00:53:830 (5,6) - would recommend making sounds like 00:53:992 and 00:54:316 active for better emphasis like https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/18446996/c4b7
01:05:019 (4,5,6) - could add additional hs to the triples so they don't feel empty. Whistles would work in this case and toms would too.
01:10:695 (2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) -
02:36:316 (2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) -
I would nc this 1/3 burst cause right now there is no visual feedback that indicates this is 1/3 + later in the map you nc the 1/3 (like for example: 02:46:371 (1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1) - )
01:25:938 (1,2) - imo making these sliders have a higher sv would be a much nicer entry into the kiai since you're emphasizing the vocals
01:29:668 (1,2,3,4,5) - this flows kind of weird compared to how you were doing it at 01:28:857 (3,4,5) and the rest of kiai tbh
01:33:073 (1,2,3) - maybe change this to a 1/1 slider instead? you already have the repeating pattern here 01:32:100 (1,2,1,2) - so having the same slidershape for a different held vocal would be better
01:42:479 (3) - could change this slider to a different shape for better differentiation with 01:41:506 (1) as they are different sounds.
01:56:262 (1,2,3,4,5) - would recommend placing this like https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/18447002/9328 for better flow
I see what you mean but I will keep it for now, to keep the concept with the revere and the triple 01:56:587 (5,1,2) -
02:04:857 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) would make distance between these circles in the stream smaller than 02:05:506 (9,10,11,12,13,14) these so you emphasize the increase in pitch of piano here.
If you do this can NC 02:05:506 (9) for the same reason :3c
like you did 02:15:154 (6,1) here!
02:22:614 (1,2,3,4,5) same thing here lower spacing between these to emphasize pitch increase on 02:23:019 (6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14) better and NC 02:23:019 (6)
02:14:749 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - doing some kind of acceleration would make this represent piano so much better and would look cooler
03:20:911 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - too
02:22:614 (1,2) - very weird that u decided to stack these honestly not only it doesn't rlly fit with the song whatsoever it also feels random considering the style of mapping, i'd suggest u consider not stacking this one honestly
and to be honest, this rhythm https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/979459335505719346/1068171103379390535/image.png would work much better here imo to emphasize the triple afterwards but up to you
02:52:695 (1,2) - this spacing looks off compared to how you are usually doing 1/2's on this part -> 02:51:560 (2,3) - 02:55:614 (2,1) -
03:06:316 (4,5,6,7,8) - this is a continuous stream here, maybe instead of making these jumps here maybe try something like this? https://prnt.sc/IHfeFruE4y5E would fill in the gaps here while representing the cymbals in the hitsounds
03:18:641 (1,2,1,2) + 01:34:857 (1,2,3) are the exact same rhythm but spaced vastly different which doesn't make such sense since intensity stays the same.
Recommend to use the same spacing for both of these for consistency
03:35:019 (5) - since you're following the synths thingies here 03:33:722 (2,4) - maybe make these 2 circles instead?
03:35:181 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - this is pretty awakrd imo, since the song doesnt ask for this rhythm and the first 3 stacked notes arent really supported by the song, consider using this rhythm
https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/979459335505719346/1068173274699276298/image.png works way better with the melody