EDM Jumpers ({E+H}DM Reboot)

00:02:733 (2733|2,2837|1,2940|0,3147|2,3250|1,3354|0) - 这两个用一样方向的流个人感觉有点怪，因为合成器音高走向不同，建议把后面00:03:147 (3147|2,3250|1) - ctrl+H，1轨的两个可以不动，因为低音部分应该是相同的

00:03:147 00:09:768 Why here is only single. Considering 00:04:181, this should be double as well. Is there any special meaning to make it only single in the 1/4 stream? And also maybe 04:54:250 and 05:00:871

00:03:250 00:03:354 have same sound like 00:02:733 (2733|2,2837|1) - and 00:02:526 (2526|0) -
00:02:733 (2733|2,2837|1) - vs 00:03:250
00:02:526 (2526|0) - vs 00:03:354
you should add notes for these. this part is simple part. don't need to mind that small gap

00:03:975 (3975|2,3975|0,4181|3,4181|0) - 和 00:10:595 (10595|0,10595|2,10802|0,10802|3) - 可以考虑做成同轨的，因为他们是完全相同的可以强调一下

00:11:216 (11216|3,11216|0) - 其实这个音相对于 00:11:423 (11423|0,11423|2,11630|1,11630|0,11837|3,11837|1) - 是明显更弱的 可以考虑只做个单押·

00:12:664 (12664|1,12664|0,12768|3,12768|2,12871|0,12871|1,12975|2,12975|3) - u can use 2-1-2 pattern to reduce density and create gap

00:14:319 (14319|3) - can move to col1(1|2|3|4) to reduce pressure from 00:14:319 (14319|3,14475|3) -

00:16:595 (16595|1) - move to col1 to advoid 00:16:181 (16181|1,16595|1,16802|1) -

00:16:802 (16802|0,16802|3) - 建议移动到2、3轨，然后00:17:009 (17009|2) - 移动到1或者4轨去。
原因是前者的音阶明显和00:17:009 (17009|2,17216|0,17216|3,17423|0,17423|3,17837|0,17837|3) - 不同，既然00:18:250 (18250|2,18250|0) - 可以作出区分那这里也可以作出区分。
在00:20:113 (20113|0,20113|3) - 00:23:423 (23423|0,23423|2) - 00:21:975 (21975|1,21975|3) - 00:25:078 (25078|1,25078|3) - 也可以和他们之后的两个/三个音阶相同的LN作出轨道区分，可以在主难度也应用这一条

00:19:906 00:20:319 missing a clap

00:20:113 (20113|0,20113|2,20113|3) - accroding to 00:16:802 (16802|1,16802|3) - , double is enough

00:20:113 (20113|3,20113|2,20113|0,20526|3,20526|0,20733|1,20733|3,20733|0) - 这三个时间点，第一个和后面两个的合成器的音高是不同的吧，建议拆开

00:21:354 (21354|3,21406|1,21457|2,21509|0,21561|3,21561|1) - u can simplify this place to create gap like:

00:28:181 - double? same as 00:27:147 -

00:29:009 (29009|2,29423|2) - ctrl+H like what u do in 00:30:250 (30250|0,30250|2,30250|3,30664|3,30664|2,30664|0,31078|0,31078|2,31078|3) - and 00:31:906 (31906|0,31906|3,31906|1,32319|3,32319|0,32319|1,32733|1,32733|0,32733|3) -

00:32:319 - 这里是否可以采一个Growl bass？

00:35:423 (35423|2) - make into stack like 00:35:630 (35630|3,35630|1,35837|1,35837|3) - 00:36:044 (36044|2,36044|0,36250|2,36250|0) -

00:38:113 (38113|3,38113|0,38164|2,38216|1,38268|3,38319|0,38371|2,38423|1,38475|0) - 00:36:457 (36457|3,36457|0,36509|1,36561|2,36613|0,36664|3,36716|1,36768|2,36819|3) - look like same as another diff. u can change into another pattern to make some difference

00:40:078 (40078|1,40130|0,40181|1) - advoid this pls

00:40:181 - 和主难一样变成321吧🥺

00:43:078 (43078|3,43181|3,43492|3,43595|3,43906|3,44009|3) - Continuous minijack on col 3, is there any reason for that? This should be available to make some adjustments. You can hear 00:43:906 the sounds are not in the same part as the previous two, so maybe you can only move the col of the last minijack. Same as 00:50:526, 02:29:837, etc

00:44:526 (44526|3,44578|2,44630|1) - 这个荡的有点奇怪，我感觉主难那样更好点

00:47:630 - 和主难提的建议一样，最好能和 00:48:613 -的pattern做点区别，因为两个声音不太一样
我的想法是这样，只是一个参考

00:50:837 - 这个地方没有别的音色，个人觉得最好是单吧

00:51:457 (51457|3) - 是否是ghost note？（因为我听的背景只有saw声音且即使是侧链影响也不是在这里开始）

Add note on 00:51:975 . You expressed a similar vocal sample on 00:52:492 (52492|1) - .

00:52:802 (52802|0,52802|1) - 这两颗是不是可以移到3/4轨并交替位置一下让它和00:52:699 (52699|3,52699|2) - 这两颗构成一个双押纵（是这么叫的嘛？uwu）

00:59:940 - 也许少个LN？和00:59:113 - 一样的

01:01:699 - 感觉这段省略的太多了，最好能把鼓点也写一下，不然太空了

01:10:906 - 01:17:526 - missing note

01:11:630 - 像这样用LN连起来感觉会更好

01:16:181 missing note on col1 , it should be the same as 01:17:009 (77009|3) -

01:22:802 - 这里用全米就行了用LN有点spike

01:22:802 - 这些LN是...？而且为什么这后面都变成single note了uwu？

01:28:492 (88492|1,88492|0,88595|1,88595|0,89113|2,89113|1,89216|1,89216|2,90147|3,90147|2,90250|2,90250|3,90768|2,90768|1,90871|1,90871|2) - 根据这一段，这些双是不是可以改成三uwu？

01:33:147 Here I would like to suggest making here more gradual, from single to double, ignoring snares you caught here since they're not prominent.

01:38:009 (98009|1) - 这个LN没必要吧？因为01:37:906 (97906|0) - 这个是1/2长度的Vocal

01:54:871 Here there should be drum sound as well. Using double would be fit here. Same as 04:07:285

02:06:457 - 02:06:664 - missing 1/4LN?

02:07:078 (127078|1,127078|2,127181|2,127181|1) - 双押放在左手上？其他地方类似的pattern的双押都放在左手或右手

02:07:181 - 去掉一个note

02:12:354 (132354|3,132457|3,132664|0,132768|0) - 应该和前面02:09:044 (129044|3,129147|2,129354|3,129457|2) - 写成一样？

On 02:29:423 Might be better if you put the minijack on col 2 instead of col 1. It also compliments the minijack
at 02:30:044 .

02:38:526 (158526|1,158733|2) - 这个感觉可以都改成1/2长度，和实际长度更接近

02:50:113 (170113|2,170113|1,170113|0) - 应该和02:49:285 (169285|2,169285|3,169285|0,169699|3,169699|2,169699|0) - 同轨，与02:47:630 (167630|3,167630|1,167630|0,168044|0,168044|1,168044|3,168457|1,168457|0,168457|3) - 的轨道变化应一致

这里五个LN为一组，只有最后两个LN会变轨

02:57:975 - 02:58:802 - 02:59:630 - 03:00:457 - 之前都没有出现过真四押，而且这一段乐段就这四次，按照一致性建议删掉四押中一个键，可以的话也可以把前面的LN的小尾巴延长到这里

03:04:595 I may know what you mean, but triple seems to be overmapped here. You can consider one of the double LNs as the replacement of single.

03:09:871 (189871|0) - 往右移一列不然第二列有点空

也许03:13:285 - 和03:13:388 - ，，03:13:492 - 和03:13:595 - 成锚？如果是采那个四连音的话

03:14:526, 03:15:147, etc for these doubles behind doubles, I would like to suggest still making them triples for the strong drum or snare sounds. only double jacks seem not to be enough strong

03:23:423 - 这里用1/8和主难有点区别

03:24:044 - 这段的单点note是干啥用的，声音和03:22:388 - 是一个声音吧

03:32:319 - 也许新开一列？这一个点降调挺明显的

04:08:319 - 这个note是采？并且个人感觉有必要采04:08:423 - 的人声

04:24:871 - 这里感觉还是抓主旋律好

04:25:078 (265078|0,265130|1,265233|0,265285|1) - 1/8缝用得有点奇怪+突然，最好换成3/16，或者省略掉04:25:233 - 这个1/8

04:38:423 (278423|1,278423|0,278526|0) - 可以把连点和LN放在不同的手上，这里次难度比主难度难。

04:40:113 Unused green line, please remove it

05:01:181 - 05:01:285 - 可以采，首尾呼应(

05:05:009 - 05:05:423 - 05:05:837 - 个人感觉还可以补俩仨个note上，毕竟还很明显，05:04:595 - 还用了双押，如果补上那几个可以更好淡出个人觉得