00:03:707 (3707|1) - LN? Like LN 00:03:064 (3064|3,3278|0,3493|3) - I think it sounds the same here.
00:07:564 - to 00:14:207 -
Just want to double check to make sure that 1/2 hihat + vocal spots like 00:08:850 (8850|1,8850|2) - and 00:10:564 (10564|2,10564|3) - are intentionally different than stuff like 00:07:564 (7564|1) - and 00:09:707 (9707|2) - ! If so, then it's fine as is.
oh, this also applies to 00:12:278 (12278|0) - , 00:12:707 (12707|3,12707|2) - , 00:13:135 (13135|0) - , and 00:13:135 (13135|0) - as well
(I won't be able to finish checking stuff right now btw, I'm just killing time before work by rechecking the top 2 diffs lol)
aaa why did I paste the same timestamp twice
I forgot to paste 00:13:993 (13993|2,13993|0) - lol
00:31:671 (31671|1) - might be worth deleting since the other strong hihats in this section (00:32:100 - , 00:32:528 - , and 00:32:957 - ) aren't added in
I also noticed that 02:01:243 (121243|3) - represents a vocal note while 00:31:671 (31671|1) -
00:34:778 (34778|3,35207|1,35635|3,36064|1,36493|3,36921|1) - these alternating 1/2 LNs for the trombones are really nice ngl
00:52:564 (52564|1) - would work really well as a regular note imo, it'll help bring out the jump between these vocal notes: 00:52:457 (52457|0) - & 00:52:671 (52671|3) -
Same with 00:59:421 (59421|1) -
though you could make 00:59:100 (59100|0) - a LN if you want (understandable if you don't though, it's a really short vocal note in the music)
Also 01:06:278 (66278|2) - , 01:13:135 (73135|2) - , and similar instances in the second kiai
00:54:921 (54921|1) - This is like super super subjective but this could be extended to a 1/2 LN since the vocal note kinda blends into 00:55:028 (55028|2) - really well, more so than previous 1/4 vocal note parts like 00:52:135 - . I think it'll help to make this part stand out a little more
Same with 01:01:778 (61778|1) - , 01:08:635 (68635|2) - , 01:15:493 (75493|2) - , and similar instances in the second kiai ofc
sort of the same situation with 01:19:778 (79778|1) - and 01:26:635 (86635|2) - (I was a little conflicted on whether I wanted to put this in a different post or not but I think the last part justifies putting it in a different post)
With 01:26:635 (86635|2) - I think a LN would work better at 01:26:850 (86850|2) - to line up with the vocal note
01:26:207 (86207|0,86207|2,86421|0) - doesn't line up with the music as well as 01:19:350 (79350|3,79564|3) - imo since this part doesn't have the same 1/2 vocal notes as the first part. Maybe 01:26:421 (86421|0) - could be deleted and 01:26:207 (86207|0) - could be a 1/1 LN?
applies to 02:48:921 (168921|1) - and 02:55:778 (175778|2) - too if you agree (though 02:55:350 (175350|0,175564|0) - is fine as is ofc)
hmm I think a note should be added to 01:26:421 - for the hihat/xylophone since notes are added in at 01:20:421 (80421|1) - and 01:20:850 (80850|1) -
01:20:850 (80850|1,80957|2) - I might be missing something here but I'm not quite sure what these LNs represent
01:20:957 (80957|2) - kinda makes sense since the background vocal part changes pitch here, but there's no LN at 01:20:635 (80635|3,80635|2) - for the initial background vocal note
01:55:135 (115135|3) - would work a liiiitle better in 1 imo, it's closer to 01:54:707 (114707|0) - in pitch than 01:54:814 (114814|3) -
03:03:921 (183921|2) - hmm it might just be me but I think this would fit into the music a little better if it was extended to 03:05:635 - since the note doesn't decrease in intensity too much between 03:05:207 - and 03:05:635 -