00:01:834 (1834|0) - not really sure what this note is for, i don't hear a noticeable music queue to keep this
00:05:034 (5034|2) - this too
00:02:434 - as with other diffs i believe the song here is stronger and patterns should be adjusted to represent it. here i would move 00:02:534 (2534|1) down to it and maybe shorten 00:02:034 (2034|3) and move 00:02:334 (2334|0) down
00:02:534 (2534|3) - since this pitch is different than this 00:02:034 (2034|3) - consider putting it into a different column
00:03:934 (3934|0) - i'm pretty confident this is supposed to be representing the sound at 00:03:834, and if it wasn't i suggest you move it there because the guitar is much louder
00:04:232 (4232|3,4732|1,5132|2) - these should just be standard 2/1 LNs, they sound weird not being that
00:36:134 (36134|2,36234|3,36334|0,36434|1) - this is the only time 4 consecutive notes are used in the entire difficulty, and considering the song is 300bpm, i think it's fair to simplify it a bit
00:36:629 (36629|3,36629|2,36829|1,37029|2,37229|0,37429|1,37629|3,37829|2,38029|1,38229|0,38429|2,38629|1,38829|3,39029|0,39029|1)
00:54:829 (54829|3,55029|1,55229|1,55429|3,55629|2,55829|1,56029|0,56229|1,56429|2,56629|0,56629|3) - Avoid using more than 5 consecutive 1/1 notes. (converted up to 300 BPM)
00:47:832 (47832|3,48032|1,48232|2,48432|0,48632|1,48832|2) -Avoid using more than 5 consecutive 1/1 notes
though this one is at 6 so i'll leave to your decision
Technical defense: this doesnt appear frequently
Practical defense: will look at it when im able to (so i could judge whether its too hard or no)
00:49:434 (49434|1,49734|2) - would suggest you move the point where these two lns meet down to 00:49:634 as the pitch shift is more audible there
00:54:234 (54234|0) - extend this ln to 00:54:834 (54834|3) and make 00:54:534 (54534|2) not a ln as the guitar is one long sound rather than two split sounds like before
01:04:828 (64828|3,65128|3,65428|3,65728|3,66028|3) - i can't tell which instrument is being followed here, it doesn't seem like it's either drum or guitar. i suggest you focus on one of those instruments because it's familiar for the player to follow
01:14:229 (74229|2,74429|0,74629|1,74829|2,75029|3,75229|1,75429|0,75629|2,75829|1) - Avoid using more than 5 consecutive 1/1 notes.
01:36:729 (96729|0) - Long notes should be held for at least two beats.
this should just be a single note
wouldn't this apply to 01:33:632 (93632|3) , 01:35:232 (95232|0) , 01:38:432 (98432|3) , 01:40:032 (100032|0) , 01:41:632 (101632|3) , 01:42:432 (102432|0) , 01:43:232 (103232|2) , and 01:44:032 (104032|1) too
if you refer to those timestamp, then wouldn't previous / earlier timestamp applies?
01:31:732 (91732|3,92032|2) - 01:30:132 (90132|2,90432|0) - 00:32:832 (32832|2) - 00:36:532 (36532|0) - 00:40:032 (40032|2,40332|3) - + entire 1st kiai
for now, im only changing 00:32:832 - 1/1 LN to normal
i think since 2/1 guideline would only be directly applied at 360bpm and above, and this is only 300, so there can be some leniency here. upon further look i think the timestamps I mentioned are fine to keep, same w the ones u mention
u can resolve whenever
01:38:929 (98929|0,98929|3,99329|0,99329|1,99529|2,99529|3) - Avoid using chords during consecutive 1/1 note patterns.
01:49:332 (109332|0,109598|1,109865|2) - these would play a lot better if they were 1/1 and not 4/3
01:49:732 (109732|2,109932|3) - maybe U can flip the lanes here to represent downward pitch in music
01:50:432 (110432|3) - from rc - "Objects should not be placed during a 2/1 long note's hold duration."
u could do something like this instead
or make the last LN a double for emphasis