i chose to express the rhythm there with a 3/4 repeat slider to emphasize the dominant part of the music (the melody) whilst keeping the rhythm complexity suitable for an insane difficulty. if i were to express the beats landing on the 1/2 beats it would become unnecessarily dense imo.
00:25:780 (1,2,1,1,2) - These are too overdone especially considering this is an insane diff. Would be better if you could tone down the spacing especially 00:26:131 (1) .
00:25:780 (1,2,1) - tho 1/4 slider can be seen as jump, but for insane diff, this still be too hard?
I mean sense of distance is the most important, and other stacking or symmetry is only second.
00:54:026 (2,1) - As the rhythm you choose here. 2 and 1 are way too closed, you should take 1 away from 2, or, just stack on 2.
i see what you mean but i chose to map it this way so that 00:58:763 (7) and 00:59:816 (2) stack nicely
01:00:868 (1,1,1) -
I can't hear any particular sound here so don't know what sound these objects are following.
maybe just use slider to cover here? like other diffs do
01:01:044 (1,2) - rhythm change to this fit better? https://imgur.com/a/uNhINK9 to simplify 1/3 rhythm.
01:18:237 (1) - Would be better if you map this as a circle instead of a kick slider as the vocals starts on 01:18:412 (2) and it's currently misrepresenting what the song does.