On My Own

00:00:485 - double.

00:11:864 (11864|2,12209|2,12553|2) - 00:13:933 (13933|3,13933|2,14278|3,14622|2,14967|3,15140|2,15485|2,15657|3,16002|3,16002|2,16347|2,16691|2) - 00:17:381 (17381|1,17381|0,17726|1,18071|1,18416|1,18760|0,19105|0) - 00:19:450 (19450|2,19450|3,19795|3,20140|3,20485|3,20657|2,21002|2,21174|3,21519|3,21519|2) -

it seems really good to create one flow.

however, it seems that the balance needs some work

the flow of building up strength in one hand and releasing it in the other hand is really well thought out, but the hand balance influence is very significant. It is probably because the elements that interfere with the expression of the flow were used closely.

00:14:967 (14967|3,15140|2,15485|2,15657|3,16002|2,16002|3,16347|2,16691|2) - subjective stuff, this part here is abit right-handed so probably can rearrange some into left hand as well?

00:16:864 (16864|1) - this note is unnecessary
00:22:381 (22381|2) - same ^

00:21:864 (21864|3,22209|3,22553|3,22898|3) - kinda unnecessary anchors coz it sounds different one to each other, can rearrange?

00:22:553 - as for piano chord, and as the beginning of new section, this note deserves a double imo.

also for a big picture on this part, need to watchout the consistency on double usage, like this snare was doubled 00:22:898 (22898|3,22898|1) - but single afterwards 00:25:657 (25657|0) -

also there is double for kick? 00:23:416 (23416|3,23416|2) -

will let mapper to do the self check first at this long part until 00:33:588 -

00:24:967 (24967|2,24967|3,25312|2,25485|3,25657|2,26002|2,26174|3,26519|2,26691|3,26864|2,27209|2,27381|3,27553|2,27726|3,27898|2) - BRUH

#4506365 maybe it's similar to this discussion.

it seems like there's a big hand balance issue during the pattern creation process. there's no real solution, but you have to re-arrange it. also, make sure that there are no spikes.

00:26:864 (26864|2) - move this note to column 4, column 4 is empty in this section and it's a bit awkward
00:32:036 (32036|1) - same ^

00:28:416 (28416|3,28588|3) - I feel like an "LN" on a "rice" map, so I hope you have a good reason for this singles duo.

00:28:416 (28416|3,28588|3) - although rc allow this pattern it still poor playability. i suggest 00:28:416 (28416|3) - in col1. same 00:30:657 (30657|0) - in col4 and 00:32:898 - :

00:33:243 (33243|2,33416|2) - its better not to use this kind of structure pattern as much as possible

its a bit difficult 00:33:243 (33243|2,33416|2,33760|2) - also too crowded visually

00:33:760 (33760|1,33933|0,34105|1,34278|0) - col3 col4 are a bit empty. adjust them.

00:44:622 (44622|1,44622|0,44795|2) -> 00:45:657 (45657|1,45657|3,45829|0) -

00:47:381 (47381|1,47381|0,47553|2) - 00:48:416 (48416|1,48416|3,48588|2) - 00:50:140 (50140|1,50140|0,50312|1) -> 00:51:174 (51174|0,51174|2,51347|3) -

do you see the difference?

it's really inconsistent, with some parts not putting LN at the start of the melody and some parts connecting. you can clearly understand it if you compare with Hyper difficulty. it's similar to making a temporary gap for excessive LN use. maybe you can express it that way too.

00:49:795 (49795|1,50140|1,50312|1) - #4506378

00:53:760 (53760|3,53933|2,54105|1,54278|0,54450|3,54622|2,54795|1,54967|0,55140|3,55312|2,55485|1) - it seems like a very meaningless pattern. would be better to place it so that a large visual element appears in the melody like u used to

00:55:312 (55312|2) - probably just make this LN longer until 00:55:657 - as the release on 1/2 doesn't seems expressing anything

00:57:985 - maybe a note 1/4 here? how did you do it here 01:00:743 -

00:58:416 (58416|1,58588|1,59278|0,59450|0) - you didn't make any jacks before, so i suggest break them. 00:58:588 (58588|1,59278|0) - col4.

01:06:691 - triples are not allowed in normal diff.

01:06:691 - ~ 01:28:760 -

01:10:485 (70485|3,70657|3) - 01:11:864 (71864|1,72036|1) -

01:13:071 (73071|0,73243|1,73243|0,73416|1) -

01:14:622 (74622|0,74795|0,74967|2,75140|2,75312|1,75485|1) - 01:16:002 (76002|3,76174|3) - 01:16:347 (76347|1,76519|1) -

01:18:588 (78588|1,78760|0,78760|1,78933|0) - 01:22:726 (82726|1,82898|0,82898|1,83071|0) -

01:19:967 (79967|3,80140|3) -

01:20:829 (80829|2,81002|2) - there are too many, so ill stop here.

these are the stacks you used. id say they're irregular. some parts aren't used at all, some parts are overused, and there are a lot of layouts that seem to be too one-handed.

01:28:760 - ~ 01:50:485 - same here, sadly.

01:07:381 - kiai part to outro, may too hard for this level players. rearrange them.
Basically, break most of jacks, and 01:13:243 (73243|1,73416|1,73760|1,74105|1,74450|1,74622|1) - looks weird.
this part is too long and with doubles and jacks so it may demanding. i suggest you change snapping idea and simplify this part.

01:08:933 (68933|0,69105|2,69105|1) and patterns similar through the kiai could be changed to jacks as well for consistency as the sound isn't any different and it feels strange to have it mostly random

01:18:416 (78416|2) - this one should splitted into 2 LNs like 01:07:381 (67381|1,67553|2) - , since it don't have high pitch

01:19:795 (79795|0) - 01:21:174 (81174|3) - 01:22:553 (82553|3) - these ones too

01:27:209 - missing note
Contradicts in 01:21:691

01:28:760 - I don't really understand the LN placement on post kiai, like this 01:31:519 (91519|0) - should fits with LN better like 01:32:898 (92898|3) -

need self check first and reconsidering the concept since I don't really get what it catch on the LN

01:50:829 (110829|3,110829|2) - at the end point, it might be a good idea to put notes in columns 1 and 4, considering the current layout.

it's because it's difficult if the boomerang effect of the pattern remains until the end. also, players like a clean finish and a neat feeling.

so how about changing it like this?