mapped by arronchu1207
submitted
last updated
This beatmap wasn't updated since 14 September 2023 so it was graveyarded...
New Discussion
Please sign in to post or reply
Discussions
Sort by

00:39:295 (2,3) - a little too big, could nerf to 00:38:190 (2,1) - spacing.

permalink

nerfed

permalink
Marked as resolved by arronchu1207

00:42:374 - Could make this active as you also mapped 00:41:190 (4,5,6) -

permalink

i didnt notice this

permalink
Marked as resolved by arronchu1207

00:52:085 (2,1) - 00:52:559 (2,1) - Would say making them space larger would give better impact to 00:52:085 (2,2,2) -

permalink

yes

permalink
Marked as resolved by arronchu1207

00:53:506 (3,1,2,3) - This is kinda spikey with a spacing contrast into double rhythm patterning. Would say you could make 00:53:348 (2,3) - a slider so that it's not that spikey and also emphasizes 00:53:664 (1,2,3) - more.

permalink

ok

permalink
Marked as resolved by arronchu1207

00:53:822 (2,3) - 00:55:559 (1,2) - 01:00:137 (2,3) - Could probably unite the nc so it's easier to read as the rhythm is already really complex.

permalink

does it mean i just un-nc them to make it consistent

permalink

either nc all heads or all unnc, both work

permalink

ok fixed

permalink
Marked as resolved by arronchu1207

01:00:137 (2,3) - Could do similar spacing as 01:00:927 (2,3,4) - as they're both 1/4 and you only used bigger spacing when the second note is a slider.

permalink

ok

permalink
Marked as resolved by arronchu1207

01:06:137 (1,1,1,1) - this kinda confusing personally, it's a bit sudden and since the sliders look identical it's a bit hard to tell the rhythm. i think you could use a lower sv for the 1/4 sliders (maybe x1.5 multiplier)

permalink

same should be applied to 01:53:664 - 00:45:137 (1) -, using 1.5x sv max should work better not to make the diff too hard especially as the hard diff doesn't use too many sv changes

permalink

fixed, ^ also fixed (1.8x -> 1.5x)

permalink
Marked as resolved by arronchu1207

01:35:665 (1,2,3) - With slider leniency this just looks really weak for the three louder voices. Could move it further apart or buff it some other way to better fit the music.

permalink

wow

permalink
Marked as resolved by arronchu1207

01:37:559 (1,2,3) - 01:41:349 (1,2,3) - etc. This is kinda too much of a jump especially becuz you don't really have anything similar before + this pattern is just really spikey. Move it closer to each other pls.

permalink

fixed

permalink
Marked as resolved by arronchu1207

01:37:559 (1,2,3,1) - What happened to the linear flow here? It's kinda emphasizing 01:38:033 (1) - a little too much. Consider nerfing it.

permalink

nerfed

permalink
Marked as resolved by arronchu1207

01:51:454 (2) - Would recommand changing to 2 notes so it better follows the main rhythm.

permalink

ok

permalink
Marked as resolved by arronchu1207

01:55:242 (3) - sliderend is unsnapped here

permalink

oops

permalink
Marked as resolved by arronchu1207

01:59:349 (1,2,3) - Awkward movement + large spacing makes 02:00:296 (1) - not really stand out. Consider changing the pattern to something like
so the grouping looks better.

permalink

ok

permalink
Marked as resolved by arronchu1207
/