Cthugha

00:00:089 (89|1) - similar idea as #3464506 but to move to c4, once again it is very nitpicky / shitpicking so not a huge deal either way to accept / reject

00:03:188 ; 00:03:610 - feel like should be rice notes added at these timestamps for vocals

00:16:004 - 00:16:216 - doesn't feel accurate to the sound, I would stop the 1/6 shlongs sooner

how about something like this (doesn't have to be exact selection but you get the idea) -> https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/18318736/7d80

00:37:554 (37554|2,37554|1) - double seems overemphasizing here, especially when you used single at 00:36:709 (36709|1) -> would remove c2

00:43:188 (43188|1) - can be moved to col 4 for avoid 7 consecutive, because have same rhythm with 00:33:751 -

00:46:709 - 00:47:554 - feels like some of the doubles here could be promoted to triples for percussion emphasis - since 00:46:850 (46850|2,46850|3) feels weaker than the other doubles that follow it

my impression is these notes ( 00:46:990 (46990|2,46990|0,47131|0,47131|1,47272|2,47272|1) ) but it is your call

00:56:286 - quite odd having a triple for kind kick less harder than 00:56:850 - . those were the same weight either using 1/8 stream roll. double is enough

01:06:850 - I think you used wrong logic here for LN wub. the correct one may be this :https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/18465941/a134 you can compare with you used before : 01:02:483 (62483|3,62483|2,62624|3,62624|2) -

01:14:173 (74173|0) - the LN sound is vanishing here unlike 01:13:892 (73892|0) - . its more like a minijack : https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/18465945/9ac8

01:18:681 (78681|0,78821|0) - how about move col 2? i can hear a changed lyrics. example : 1-1-2-2

01:22:061 - hmm I think you use LN here for vocal ? if so I think the correct structure is :https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/18465948/ef42

01:27:835 (87835|2,87976|0) - just wondering, why make double? since this part was calm section

01:38:399 (98399|0,98399|3,98399|2) - it probably should be double, if you are going to be consistent with the patterning rules such as 01:39:244 (99244|1,99244|0) ; 01:39:807 (99807|3,99807|0) ; 01:40:652 (100652|3,100652|2) - or alternatively promote these other to triple, but I can see that as overkill / over-mapping

01:43:047 - could make quad here, since it is done at 01:41:920 ; 01:44:173 ; 01:44:737 - but if it is perceived as over-mapping then feel free decline

01:49:244 - can you tell me your logic of quad here ? really cant understand why quad here compare with 01:48:681 - even 01:48:962 -

01:52:624 - no LN here so I think 01:52:202 (112202|0) - should be deleted

01:56:990 - seems no main melody here so seems like wrong LN logic used. how about this?https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/18465957/05fa

02:15:371 (135371|2,135441|2) - this minijack feels uncomfortable to play, maybe remove the first note?

02:15:371 (135371|2) - really wanna delete this cuz you use minijack only once in the whole song and may very suck with the sv.

02:20:371 - probably it was my skill issue, how about move col2 to col3 ? for avoiding a miss combo at this consecutive triple

02:24:737 - 02:26:216 - anchor on col3 and 02:26:990 - 02:28:610 - anchor on col2, are they too long?
to say the least, if these anchors are deliberately mapped to follow the vocal samp，maybe 02:29:244 - 02:30:793 - here also need another one?

02:33:047 (153047|1,153047|0) - could be promoted to triple for cymbal emphasis

it would also be consistent with earlier 00:28:962 (28962|1,28962|3,29103|0,29103|3,29103|2)