mapped by BryNu
submitted
last updated
This beatmap wasn't updated since 12 December 2020 so it was graveyarded...
New Discussion
Please sign in to post or reply
Discussions
Sort by

00:10:242 (5,6,7) - I think this rhythm is kinda unintuitive as the loudest sounds are on the slider ends. maybe ctrl+g the rhythm (Like: 00:15:451 (3,4,5,6,7) - )

permalink

Good point, fixed.

permalink
Marked as resolved by BryNu

00:25:691 - you need to make this spinner shorter, according to the ranking criteria spinners on hard diffs need to have at least 1 empty beat after them, so just end it on 00:25:511 -

permalink

Done!

permalink
Marked as resolved by BryNu

00:42:218 (7,8) - this part is supposed to be essentially the same as 00:39:344 (7,8) - since the same thing repeats with minor differences, so to keep the rhythm consistent just use note - 1 beat slider as you did before.

permalink

Also done.

permalink
Marked as resolved by BryNu

00:46:709 (1) - maybe un-nc this for consistency? (I honestly have no idea why this is NCed in the first place xD)

permalink
permalink
permalink

Yes yes

permalink
Marked as resolved by BryNu

00:53:894 (7) - same thing here, this should be a reverse

permalink

Fair enough, fixed.

permalink
Marked as resolved by BryNu

00:56:050 (1) - un-nc this for 2 measure consistency (which you basically use throughout the whole diff)

permalink
permalink

Done

permalink
Marked as resolved by BryNu

00:57:397 - maybe mute the sliderend as there is no real sound on the blue tick.

permalink

Done

permalink
Marked as resolved by BryNu

01:01:080 (1,2) - this might be too difficult and unintuitive for a hard player to read, I recommend continuing with 01:00:362 (1,2) - these (https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/15879356/4230)

permalink

I wasn't sure what to do there, and saw another Hard diff' from a ranked mapset using this pattern at this specific part of the song. I've tried making it clear that 01:00:362 (1,2) - and 01:01:080 (1,2) - are not the same length by making a NC and making sure distance snapping is respected, so hopefully it should be enough. I'll see, though, maybe I'll change my mind and change it.

permalink
Marked as resolved by BryNu

I think -Rik- is correct tho as 01:00:362 (1,2,1) - are grouped as a group of 3, people might think that 01:01:080 (1) - is a 4 tick 1/4 reverse as well, eventhough it's not.I wouldn't recommend grouping them as 2 x 2 as well as people might have the same idea ofthem being 1/4. I think making all 4 for them 4 tick reverses, un-ncing 01:01:080 (1) - and grouping them all in one line makes much more sense to me as the pattern automatically gets much mroe intuitive with consistency and spacing.

permalink
Reopened by KaedeharaKazuha

same goes for 01:11:859 (1,2,1,2) -

permalink

Alright, the "grouping them as a group of 3" point makes sense. I'll just make it a 4 tick reverses linear pattern.

permalink
Marked as resolved by BryNu

01:12:577 (1,2) - same thing here

permalink

:(

permalink
Marked as resolved by BryNu

01:27:667 (1,2) - why are those suddenly stacked? you didn't use any stacks before. having a spacing between those would make good emphasis for those 2 vocals imo

permalink

Actually agree with that, I thought it looked out of place but wasn't sure if i wanted to get rid of it.

permalink
Marked as resolved by BryNu

Fixed it

permalink
Marked as resolved by BryNu

01:31:259 (5,6) 01:36:289 (5,6,7,8) 01:42:756 (7,8) - it's much better to turn 1/2 into 1/1 instead just like what you did at 01:30:541 (3) and 01:42:038 (5) in order to emphasize that "siren" sound well.

permalink

It would be more consistent too

permalink
/