mapped by Side
submitted
last updated
This beatmap wasn't updated since 24 November 2023 so it was graveyarded...
New Discussion
Please sign in to post or reply
Discussions
Sort by

00:06:559 (1) - you could definitely try changing the shape of this slider as the sound its emphasizing is completely different from 00:06:324 (3) - and it will visually show to the player something different from the rest of the section is about to happen 00:06:793 (2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1) - here

permalink

visuals already do this job by overlaps, slidershape is not the only tool to do that

permalink
Marked as resolved by Minorsonek

00:07:321 I understand if you want to keep this section simplified however it would not hurt to emphasize this triple here as it is quite important to the progression in the sound

permalink

too hard for beginning of the song

permalink
Marked as resolved by Minorsonek

i kinda agree with mattay tho, 00:06:793 (2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - rhythm choice here feels a little too overgeneralized. i would've made 00:07:261 (6,7) - stand out a little more (1/8 reverse kicksliders?) than just making 00:07:379 (7,8) - doubles

permalink
Reopened by Einja

you do use 1/8 here 00:13:004 (4,5,1) - so i think it would be a great opportunity to provide emphasis imo

permalink

as mentioned, its beginning of the song, i'd like not to make it too hard

the section with 1/8 you've mentioned is far further in the song and is part of harder transition between sections, thats why it works

permalink
Marked as resolved by Minorsonek

00:13:004 (4,5,1) - quite a large jump for a 1/8 and 00:13:121 mapped passively feels like underemphasis so perhaps make this a triple

permalink

song suddenly speeds up for transition between sections, justified imo

permalink
Marked as resolved by Minorsonek

00:13:180 (5,1,2,3,4,1,1,1,1,2,1,1) - this section is sole-y focused on drum sounds however this active circle 00:13:473 (3) - does not land on a drum and feels out of place in the pattern, removing this would make alot of sense and go with this drum section properly, also 00:14:332 (1,1,2,1) - these 4 notes all emphasize similar sounds however they are separated by nc's, you should: a) completely nc spam them or b) not nc them, which would both be solutions to properly emphasize this similar sound properly

permalink

disagree, this circle fits very well complementing and simplifying the rhythm, it gives additional emphasis on the stream pattern, removing it would require to convert the stream to doubles which is not what the song calls for

00:14:645 (2) - is not NCed because rhythm

permalink
Marked as resolved by Minorsonek

00:20:739 (1,2) - in the section 00:15:114 (1,2,1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2,1,2,3,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2,3) - all these notes follow guitar however suddenly you decide to prioritize the downbeat 00:21:207 over the guitar 00:21:090 which is confusing rhythmically to the player as they would expect a guitar emphasis here

permalink

song is constantly changing, 00:21:207 (2,3) - this is slight variation of the rhythm to prepare the player and also emphasise whats coming next 00:21:676 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) -

permalink
Marked as resolved by Minorsonek

00:21:559 (3,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - now this is just a chain of 8 circles which really does not emphasize any of the musical changes here, you need to properly emphasize some of the changes for instance by adding a 1/4 slider 00:21:793 and 00:22:028 and you could add a circle 00:22:321 to complete the triple between these notes 00:22:262 (4,5) -

permalink

what i wanted to emphasise was 00:22:379 (7,8) - , you can clearly hear in the song that double drum kicks in and my pattern clearly makes it important

permalink
Marked as resolved by Minorsonek

no 1/8 for consistency with beginning, high spacing does the job anyway

permalink
Marked as resolved by Minorsonek

00:27:887 (2,1) - could you lower spacing here to indicate the change in sound between 00:27:301 (1,1) - and 00:27:770 (1,2,1,2) -, this would make sense as currently 00:24:137 (2,1) - has a smaller spacing whist being musically more intense

permalink

song is building up, not slowing down

permalink
Marked as resolved by Minorsonek

00:29:645 (4) - nc for vocal emphasis to go with 00:29:879 (1,1) -

simiarly 00:37:145 (2) - 00:44:645 (4) -

permalink

nope, as you can see its done multiple times so its clearly not a mistake, my NCing helps with rhythm readability and visual patterns, i don't really use NCes for emphasis stuff

permalink
Marked as resolved by Minorsonek

00:34:098 (2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - currently this rhythm ignores an important sound at 00:34:918, please use a similar rhythm to 00:30:114 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - to fix this

simiarly 00:42:184 (1) -

permalink

i want to follow vocals in this section, your rhythm would give different vibe

permalink
Marked as resolved by Minorsonek

00:48:864 this sound is way too important to be passively mapped with the end of a reverse slider, and this note at 00:48:981 does not land on any discernable sound, remove 00:48:981 and please map 00:48:864 actively

permalink

no vocal so its not "too important" in this section

permalink
Marked as resolved by Minorsonek

00:50:739 (1) - please do note ignore the multitude of actively mappable vocal and drum sounds that are here 00:50:973 00:51:207 00:51:324, this results in this slider feeling extremely out of place and not emphasizing the vocal properly that I believe you want to prioritize

permalink

fixed

permalink
Marked as resolved by Minorsonek

00:58:239 (1) - the flaw with this slider is that is reverse on a sound that is repeated within the middle of the slider 00:58:590 00:59:293, it would make sense if it repeated on all these sounds, but actively avoiding 2 out of the 4 sounds here results in this slider misrepresenting the music and ignoring important sounds

permalink

shape makes it work, repeats are not the only important parts of a slider

permalink
Marked as resolved by Minorsonek

i kinda agree with him though. even though the shape is pretty wacky and stands out a lot, the emphasis is still kinda lacking considering there's nothing to click. i'd either just make the slider even faster (i kinda cheesed this when i played it for the first time), or have clickable objects replace this section.

permalink
Reopened by Einja

01:02:399 (3,1) - stack like 01:00:524 (3,1) - for consistent aesthetics?

permalink

01:05:504 (1,2,1) - 1/3 not 1/8

permalink

k

permalink
Marked as resolved by Minorsonek

01:10:836 adding a triple would make sense here

permalink

not adding triple also makes sense here

permalink
Marked as resolved by Minorsonek

01:13:121 (5) - the drum sounds do end over here 01:13:004 (4) - so if you would like you could remove this circle 01:13:121 (5) as it does not emphasize the drum sound

permalink

i use this circle to emphasise next one 01:13:239 (1) -, its valid approach

permalink
Marked as resolved by Minorsonek

01:15:114 (1,2,1) - should mute slider ends here if you want to use extended sliders or just make them 1/4

permalink

leaving it up to my hitsounder

permalink

muted

permalink
Marked as resolved by Side

01:19:098 there is a piano sound here similarly to these 01:18:864 (2,3,4) - 3 actively mapped notes so I would suggest mapping this sound actively as well

permalink

i dont hear piano though, or if it is piano its maybe a different one, i only follow this most prominent one that you can hear in surrounding circles

permalink
Marked as resolved by Minorsonek

01:25:660 (1,2,1,2,1,2) - did i get kami no kotoba'd

permalink

01:37:965 (1,2,3,1,2,3) - please mute sliderends here

permalink

leaving it up to my hitsounder

permalink

muted

permalink
Marked as resolved by Side

01:39:254 (2) - slightly offscreen please move up

permalink

k

permalink
Marked as resolved by Minorsonek
/