mapped by Roger
submitted
last updated
This beatmap wasn't updated since 30 May 2020 so it was graveyarded...
New Discussion
Please sign in to post or reply
Discussions
Sort by

00:06:950 - perhaps change this note to d? The pitch of instrument is already weakened here, and feels similar to 00:07:345.

permalink

Done.

permalink

Roger.

permalink
Marked as resolved by Roger

00:09:318 - perhaps change this to k d k to be consistent with 00:03:002 as they are the same?

permalink

Done. Also made adjustment from 00:07:739 to 00:08:331 to be consistent with 00:01:424 to 00:02:216 as well as from 00:10:897 to 00:11:489 to be consistent with 00:04:581 to 00:05:173.

permalink

Personally, the problem is not 'inconsistency', instead, it is 'too consistent'. (I might have gotten it wrong, but I still think something is not ok enough here)
kdd kkd kkd sound a little bit weird, as kkd repeated immediately.
how about making it kdd kkd kdk (00:11:193 (21,22) Ctrl +G) or kdd kkd kkk (00:11:489 to k)?

permalink

Consistent is not a problem, but a matter of preference Your pattern is also okay, but aab10 have his own patterns here already and it is fine.

permalink

Roger.

permalink
Marked as resolved by Roger

00:12:969 - maybe try moving this note to 00:13:166? I think sound on white tick would deserve emphasis more as it is stronger than on the red tick, also music here is still weak to be covered as held sound.

permalink

Done.

permalink

Roger.

permalink
Marked as resolved by Roger

00:14:252 - how about changing this to d as the pitch is lower than before and there is still no variation things going on at the start? Starting with simple pattern could be better to highlight the more complicated pattern on latter part.

permalink

Done.

permalink

Roger.

permalink
Marked as resolved by Roger

00:21:554 - the note here and after this is somehow confusing on what it is emphasizing, I noticed that you mostly follow drums but sometimes you follow vocals. I recommend to make emphasis based on one of them, so there are two options.

  1. 00:21:554 - change this note to d for giving emphasis to the high vocal at 00:21:752, or
  2. 00:21:752 - change this note to d for the obvious low pitch drum sound.

As the pitch of both timestamps are different, being it drums or vocals, having different hitsound would be more appropriate.

permalink

00:21:752 is changed to d.

permalink

Roger.

permalink
Marked as resolved by Roger

00:22:541 - how about highlight the clap sound on this part? You covered the clap sounds on 00:24:515, so it could be more consistent on what you are following and there are no vocals to both timestamps that make the clap sounds outstanding imo. I recommend you to rearrange the pattern to emphasis the clap better.

  1. 00:22:541 - change this to dkddk for covering drum sound more properly as pitch is high 00:22:640 and giving extra emphasis to the clap sound on 00:22:936 because the note before this is made to d,
  2. 00:22:541 - change this to dkdkk for covering drum precisely while still emphasis to the clap sound.

Personally, I would suggest number 1 as it gives better flow while playing and the impact of emphasis feels stronger.

permalink

Changed to dkdkk for covering drum precisely.

permalink

Roger.

permalink
Marked as resolved by Roger

00:24:614 - perhaps change this to d for giving emphasis on clap sounds more properly? It is not held sound, so making this d would give emphasis on the clap sound more properly.

permalink

Changed to d.

permalink

Roger.

permalink
Marked as resolved by Roger

00:27:673 - similar sound exist on 00:27:870, so you may consider adding note here for a more natural play in my opinion.

permalink

Added kat to 00:27:673

permalink

Roger.

permalink
Marked as resolved by Roger

00:27:673 - how about making this d instead for separating with the vocal emphasis?

permalink
Reopened by Roger

Roger.

permalink

Roger.

permalink
Marked as resolved by Roger

00:34:778 to 00:37:541 - for spread's sake, consider buffing this part by emphasizing the drum and a bit more vocal by using 1/4 pattern here. At least, you did emphasize both of them on the remaining part of kiai so it could balance overall density in my opinion.

permalink

Added don to 00:34:778 and 00:36:949.
Added kat to 00:35:272, 00:35:765, and 00:36:850.

permalink

Roger.

permalink
Marked as resolved by Roger

00:41:094 - perhaps change this note to k? The drum sound are noticeably high-pitched and you mostly cover them on many parts when the vocal is not strong, so it could be more intuitive while playing on what you are following.

permalink

Changed to k.

permalink

Roger.

permalink
Marked as resolved by Roger

00:42:081 - there is noticeable drum sound also vocal which is too prominent to skip based on what you are following, so it would be more appropriate to add note here preferably d as the drum pitch is low and can give emphasis to high vocal sound at 00:42:278.

permalink

Added d at 00:42:081.

permalink

Roger.

permalink
Marked as resolved by Roger

00:42:279 - This note is a low tom and a lower vocal than 00:43:068 - , so consider making it a d instead

permalink

Done.

permalink

Roger.

permalink
Marked as resolved by Roger

Not having notes on 00:47:804 - and 00:49:383 - feels off imo. You are following vocals mainly there, so it makes sense, but you are also ignoring a pretty noticeable note that goes on that 1/2 tick, so consider adding a note there to make a triple.

permalink

Hmm, I would agree on second timestamp but not the first one.

  1. 00:47:804 - there is no vocal here but rather long vocal starting from 00:47:607, so covering the drum when such vocal takes places are fine and could be consistent on structure. I think adding note here is unnecessary.
  2. 00:49:383 - the vocal here is strong and you cover them too on 00:44:647 and 00:46:225, also the really strong synth sound here that is prominent enough, so it would be better to place note here to cover them.
permalink

Added a d at 00:47:804 and changed 00:47:903 to d to emphasize on the drum sounds. For 00:49:383, refer to the reply below.

permalink

Roger.

permalink
Marked as resolved by Roger

00:48:989 - the pattern starting here until 00:50:370 seems a bit confusing on what they are following. At first, it seems like following drums but suddenly following the synth and then the vocals, so it feels just like random hitsound placement because you don't really focus on each sound. I would recommend rearrange the pattern here to fit the music better. The pattern could be:

  1. "k k ddk d k d D" to cover drum, vocal and synth sounds properly while avoiding awkward pattern.
  2. "k d kdd k k d D" to focus on vocal and synth sounds, but feels a bit inconsistent as you are following drum mostly.

I would suggest the first option as the structure feels more consistent to the other parts and be more intuitive to hitsounding.

permalink

Regarding adding notes at 00:49:383, I commented it to the post on #1258877

permalink

Changed to k k ddk d k d D.

permalink

Roger.

permalink
Marked as resolved by Roger

00:50:962 - you should consider adding note (preferably d for the drum pitch) here as there is obvious vocal and drum that you always follow. I think no reason ignoring this sound based on your concept.

permalink

00:52:936 - you can add note here as well.

permalink

Added don on 00:50:962 and 00:52:936

permalink

Roger.

permalink
Marked as resolved by Roger

00:54:121 (202,203) - consider swapping these two notes to show drum's pitch properly? Although there is synth sound that occurs here, you may instead make them same hitsound to separate it with the other instrument and not based on its pitch.

permalink

Kat swapped with don.

permalink

Roger.

permalink
Marked as resolved by Roger
/