humanly

00:04:343 (5) - the distance between 00:04:223 (4,5) - is way close. I think there is nothing to reduce the distance on 00:04:343 - the music.

00:17:303 (1,2,3,4) - are there any reason to place circles here? you did place slider patterns in same part of music like 00:09:623 (1,2,3,4) - 00:11:543 (1,2,3,4,5) - . and even if you going to place circles here, the distance between 00:17:423 (2,3) - is too close. There is a big drum sound on 00:17:543 -

00:28:463 (4) - I guess you wanted to make here a symmetrical pattern that's between 00:28:223 (2,3) - and 00:28:583 (5,6) - but should the jump started at 00:28:583 - instead? I don't believe there is something to make a jump on 00:28:463 -

00:35:483 (1) - consider removing or enforcing this as a 1/8th. this feels heavily overmapped since there isnt anything that lands there, but yet feels undermapped because if its following the guitar, the 1/4 rhythm gap is too late in my opinion

00:50:903 (1,1,1,1,1) - Nice symmetrical pattern!

00:54:923 (2) - I think this triple is good but i guess an audible support for it would be good even though it doesn't support any sound, it plays better imo, i got surprised by it at first ><

01:02:303 (3) - I think it's too big jump from 01:02:183 (2) - while a bigger sound keeps smaller distance on 01:02:183 - 01:02:063 (1,2) -

01:02:903 (1,2) - think 1/1 slider would probably fit better with the held vocal

01:07:463 - it's really noticeable for this empty :o.....

01:07:703 (1,2,3) - should be in the same combo as 01:07:583 (3) - imo, since it's only 1/2 spacing apart and then NC 01:07:943 (4) - instead

01:08:303 (1,2,3,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - I really think this pattern should start on 01:08:183 - that downbeat is on. or you should rework those new combos....

01:10:583 (4) - NC or unstack further from 01:10:103 (1) -

01:15:623 (1) - I'd move this to the very top cuz that would look more clean being symmetrical

01:23:543 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,1,2,1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - possibly consider some NC trick (1,1,2,1,1,1,1,2) x2, otherwise this feels a bit odd to play unless the player knows the song

01:46:943 (1,2,1) - this really doesnt need to be this intense especially from 2-1 as 1 is just a filler note anyway

01:49:703 (2,3,1,2,3) - for some reason i think it's a bit off since she starts singing the next phrase on the first (3) making the movement pretty uneven compared to what her voice actually is i dunno if it's understandable XD !!!

01:57:143 (1) - I know vocal only existing here, but I'm so sad not to see here's filled up...

02:20:183 (1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2) - i think the 1-2 patterns should be progressively spaced further apart from each other because the small increase in spacing feels very negligible

02:24:743 (3,1) - i think this 3/4 slider is really unfair in spacing, consider lowering it more since its spaced further than the 1/2 spacing in this section

02:28:583 (1,1) - same here if u go through with the change

02:28:583 (1,1) - lower spacing here for reverse emphasis would b cool, also helps players not drop sliderend

02:33:023 (1,2,3,4) - cursor movement on here is really confusing for me

02:35:543 (1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1) -

02:36:383 (1) - soft the sliderend, i cant really find anything that warrants a clap

02:36:443 - PUT SOFT SAMPLESET ON ITS TAIL?

02:46:103 - Isn't it good place to put any objects here?

03:05:183 (1) - I think this isn't necessary. there is nothing to put new combo here.

03:05:183 (1,1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2) -

03:06:803 (2,3) - shouldnt this be ctrl g'd?