00:39:353 (39353|1) - This could be turned into a normal note, to match 00:38:453 - , 00:38:753 - , 00:39:053 -
It's the exact same sound, yet you suddenly used a 1/2 beat LN.
00:39:153 (39153|1) - And this should be a 1/4 LN then
This part could look like this in the end: https://i.imgur.com/TXIa2hb.png
The little break at 00:39:453 - is intended as i believe it gives additional emphasis to the following jacks.
I think I originally wanted to do the same pattern as I did in 01:04:453 (64453|3,64503|2,64553|1,64603|0,64653|2) - since they're essentially the same, but the second one offers a LN. Personally, I think I'll keep the pattern for now, but still, thank you! I'll ask some of my friends what they think about it and I should put one there, but for now I'll mark as resolved.
01:17:253 (77253|3,77253|2) - I believe a single note is sufficient here. The sound is not so loud and a single note would make this one feel more like it belongs to the following single notes!
01:50:853 (110853|3) - This note you could move to column 1. This part has a lot of 3-noted 1/2 jacks and by moving this note you would also start with one, instead of a 2-noted 1/2 jack.
Not sure either, my thought process probably went since I used 3 LNs in the first timestamp I probably thought the only ''fair'' pattern afterwards would be a single LN, to balance out the multiple 2 LNs together. Wouldn't make sense, since the later example isn't that at all...
2 LNs make more sense though, so I'll change it to that! Thanks!
02:43:453 (163453|2,163553|0,163653|1,163653|2,163753|3,163853|0,163953|1,164053|0,164053|3,164153|2,164253|0,164353|1,164453|3,164503|2,164553|0,164603|1,164653|2) - You could CTRL+H all these notes here to get rid of the 1/8 reverse shield at 02:44:853 - .
But then your column 2 is a bit "full" at the beginning, which might also need a bit arrangement.
But i would definitely try to remove that 1/8 shield. For a Hard difficulty on this BPM that.. is really a bit much :D