Most people have read their role PM. I am starting the day now.
With 9 alive, it's 5 to lynch. Deadline is in /6/ days.
With 9 alive, it's 5 to lynch. Deadline is in /6/ days.
lol, what?animask wrote:
If I was less suspicious than usual would I be more suspicious?
XDNoHItter wrote:
...
I give up on reading you.
Your comments and claims don't make sense and are anti-town even if you ARE town.
It's funny because I was this close to posting the same thing.animask wrote:
I never get to be mafia D:
He's adorable - animask for town mascot o/DeathxShinigami wrote:
Can't we all just agree that no matter what animask is not benefitial to town?
Yea. Statements like those are very WIFOM.0_o wrote:
It's funny because I was this close to posting the same thing.
If it was then maybe you could have worded it better? Basically all you said was, if I was less X, will I be more X?animask wrote:
I didn't really say anything like that yet. I was serious with my last question.
I'll unvote you when you start "doing better" and if someone else suspicious comes around.animask wrote:
I don't want people to FoS me when I start doing better now...
Day 1 is important. Why? Because it gives you possible links to players, offers scumtells/insights that may have been ironed out by Night 1 via Scumchat, etc. So Day 1 is important.animask wrote:
Also, I thought it would be okay to be just a bit careless on Day 1 because there isn't much
being relayed around anyways and most people make somewhat random votes anyways (in larger groups).
Yes, that's what I mean. I have a strong feeling that at least some of you will be.0_o wrote:
I'm gonna take a stab at interpreting animask's question. Do you mean something like "People have been finding my previous behaviour suspicious, but if I stop acting like that will you guys find the fact that I'm acting differently suspicious?"
I doubt any townie would jump on you if they suspected you have an aux role.animask wrote:
You might be secretly assuming I have an aux role, but accusing people of having one isn't a pro-town thing to do
(at this time of the game).
I have no idea what this even means.DeathxShinigami wrote:
tick tock tick tock.
So....any ideas if we can assume what role animask is?
Good town players don't try to look less (or more) suspicious. They have nothing to worry about, and nothing to hide.animask wrote:
@Rolled, I thought being less suspicious was something that everyone is supposed to do.
No matter what role you have, being suspicious isn't a good thing.
You're right. But suspicions change; your role doesn't. Suspicions are traits of a character, and that character is bound to a role. Don't think of suspicions as traits of a role.animask wrote:
You assume that I'm hiding a role (which happens to be mafia). Being suspicious doesn't always make you mafia.
There's a difference here. DxS isn't claiming (explicitly or implicitly) that animask has a role. Rentai, however, is implicitly claiming that Rolled has a certain role. (I personally don't share this view with animask; I am just expressing my thoughts about your FoS.)Haneii wrote:
Furthermore, you spent your past posts explaining how assuming/accusing someone of a role this early in the game isn't pro-town. DxS was just role fishing + expressed his thoughts about you having a pro aux role or being a plain town member. Yet, after all that, you suspect and vote Rantai?
=[animask wrote:
Day 1 is almost over and I probably won't be able to post again before its done.
animask wrote:
Day 1 is almost over and I probably won't be able to post again before its done.
What?LS wrote:
(36 hours ago)
Deadline is in /6/ days.
Pretty sure that was a joke.NoHItter wrote:
FoS: Ph0x
Why exactly would you want to "imply"/"show" that someone is a power role?
Remember when I said that I don't really use meta as a basis for suspicion/exemption.0_o wrote:
Also, why did you vote animask for saying WIFOM things when you said yourself that he says those kind of comments regardless of his role?
(2 days ago)
Unless I read that wrong.LadySuburu wrote:
With 9 alive, it's 5 to lynch. Deadline is in /6/ days.
unvote Rantai, FoS RantaiLadySuburu wrote:
8. Voting is back to the normal system.
I'd say reactions like yours are pretty revealing.NoHItter wrote:
FoS: Ph0x
Why exactly would you want to "imply"/"show" that someone is a power role?
Well I disagree with your strategy, but fair enough.NoHItter wrote:
Remember when I said that I don't really use meta as a basis for suspicion/exemption.0_o wrote:
Also, why did you vote animask for saying WIFOM things when you said yourself that he says those kind of comments regardless of his role?
What animask said was suspicious and regardless of past play, I opt to vote suspicious players.