Rolled wrote:
With the entire way that you've played this game, it's easiest to believe that you are the player with the most to benefit from Two's lynching. You have not spent much time talking to him (D1), while you've made an effort to talk to every other player in the game thus far.
Yeah. I had deep conversations with Q, Chris, and DxS.
Rolled wrote:
In fact, you express your inability to read Two publicly. Whether it was truthful or not, I think it was still a slip up.
A slip-up of what? I don't understand why my comment seems so scummy.
Rolled wrote:
Now assuming Chris didn't bite the bullet for Two, you intended to paint me as the player with the most to gain from NKing Two using meta and probably some other things I've said in this game thus far.
Yeah. Because I totally use metas I barely remember. And, as my meta shows clearly, I totally base my arguments on nightkills.
You see, maybe you'll understand WIFOM this time:
What if you (or some other player)
wanted people to think that way?"Ph0X has the most to gain from the deaths of Two and Rolled. Therefore, I, as a mafia member, knowing Ph0X is not mafia, will try to make the town think Ph0X NK'd Two or Rolled so the town lynches him!"
In addition:
"I, Ph0X, as a mafia member, realize that I can say, simply, 'what if someone else wanted you to think that I was mafia trying to kill certain players because I'd best gain from their deaths'. I'd be off the hook then!"
Do you see the problem with this type of argument?
Rolled wrote:
You have made quite an effort to speak to me, thus you have more information on me to scumpaint, thus I would be an easier lynch target than Two would have been. You wouldn't need to waste a NK.
All that information is public. Anyone could use the same information to do the same thing, if they so wanted.
Rolled wrote:
And as you've said, you, two, and myself are some of the more influential players in this game (again, not to brag. meta.) It would be a cake walk for you as mafia if we were both eliminated early.
See my comment about WIFOM above. You're stating the same argument with different words, making it sound like you have a larger argument against me.
Rolled wrote:
Also I'd like to add that I find it very disturbing animask never found the time to answer my question before ph0x managed to respond to Two.
Why did you want animask to post before me?
From what I see, your FoS on animask is based on animask's ignorance of the busdriver role; it doesn't have any argumentative standing. What makes you think animask is a mafia member?
Rolled wrote:
... I'm certain that he'd at least be able to comprehend Two's post enough to not require a TLDR version.
You overestimate animask. When he reads something he doesn't understand, he doesn't try to re-read it and comprehend it. He's a new player and needs hand-holding most of the time. (I like to help any player, regardless of orientation (see what I did there? ;P), so don't even think about pinning me on that.)
Rolled wrote:
It's easy to expand off of ph0x's thought process now as animask the mafia goon.
My post regarding Two's post wasn't my thought process, necessarily. It was Two's thought process, but written in such a way that was, to me, more clear. I could better comprehend Two's analysis rewriting it in the way I did. I did add a few of my own comments inline, but those were intended to be inquisitory (I am a Shakespeare) because I wasn't sure I understood Two's points exactly. (Maybe a few counterarguments slipped by, but I can't change that now.) I wanted to be sure I was interpreting Two correctly.
foulcoon wrote:
The fact that you make the assumption that only one mafia member voted for Q makes it seem like you're really grasping to avoid suspicion.
I think you misunderstood what Rolled said. Re-read what he wrote before he commented about me.
Rolled wrote:
I'm speaking only on common sense. Why would both mafia members associate themselves with a lynching that they know will be town?
Minor WIFOM? "Oh, no one will think both mafia would be
so stupid as to jump on such an
easy bandwagon! Hey buddy, let's hop on!"
Rolled wrote:
Stop causing confusion to the town please.
I like how your tunnel vision caused you to completely disregard everything foul has
actually said. Let's look at this one post at a time (for all posts on just
this the previous page (14)). For the purposes of the following analysis, which includes "duh" things you may be overlooking, I assume everything foul says in the quoted text is true.
foulcoon wrote:
I simply mean that I believe with good reason that myself, animask, and Ph0x are not mafia.
No
facts can be drawn from this statement.
foulcoon wrote:
Assuming there are only 2 mafia I am certain that both animask and Ph0X are town. If there are more than 2 mafia I may be mistaken.
If foul is mafia, he is telling the truth if animask is town. (Of course, most readers can't have the same conclusion.)
If foul is town, foul knows that:
If there are two mafia members, they are not animask, Ph0X, or himself; therefore, two of bmin, Rolled, rust, and Two are mafia.
If there are more than two mafia members, he may be "mistaken", meaning animask and himself are not excluded from being mafia.
From this, I can assume that if foul is town, at least two mafia members voted for Q.
From this, I
cannot assume that if foul is town, animask and Ph0X are town.
If foul is neutral, similar conclusions can be drawn as if foul is town, with some modifications I won't bother going into now (as I don't think there are neutral players in this game).
foulcoon wrote:
I know that 2 mafia voted for lynching Q.
This confirms the assumption above: "at least two mafia members voted for Q".
Now, how does "I know that 2 mafia voted for lynching Q." equate exactly to "I know animask and Ph0X are town"? You base your suspicion of foul being a mason on the latter, yet you're building your argument on straws (and non-tasty non-kawaii anime straws at that).
... Funny how Q starts talking only after he's dead.
Prod: rust, bmin