1. Ast's Normal (3,45 stars, 273 notes)
2. Easy (2,66 stars, 212 notes)
3. Kurai's Hard (4,82 stars, 504 notes)
4. lepidon! - Taiko Oni (5 stars, 1387 notes)
5. Lunatic (5 stars, 647 notes)
6. Ono's Taiko Muzukashii (4,72 stars, 1063 notes)

Backfire wrote:

Boooooo go inner oni. Thats what im talking about yeahhhhhh

OnosakiHito wrote:

Okay, Taiko Muzukashii finished. Thank you for accepting it!
Some informations:
Max combo: 1101
Star LvL: About 8~9☆
Background: If you want - and have not a better BG yet like last time haha - you can take the BG I made for both Taiko diff's.
Generel: Well, I think this would be allready for a drum player an Oni diff., but since this is a game for keyboard muzukashii should fit.
If you want me to make it little bit more easier, just tell me.

Backfire wrote:

Boooooo go inner oni. Thats what im talking about yeahhhhhh

Not this time my boy. Rarely to see muzukashii maps from me, but it happens. lol

[Easy]
00:53:747 (5) - Why not just end the slider at 00:54:221? I tried to avoid white-red sliders. Well if someone will point in out again, i'll fix.
01:13:800 (1) - Start this spinner at 01:13:958 ok

01:17:116 (3) - Try this:
01:19:642 (4) - ^
01:27:221 (3) - ^
01:29:747 (2) - ^
01:32:273 (2) - ^
02:40:492 (2) - ^

I tried to avoid blue ticks.

KRZY wrote:

[Ast's Normal]
00:46:800 (5) - Remove clap at the head eh no
02:25:966 (2) - Try this: ok

SPOILER

KRZY wrote:

[Kurai's Hard]
00:28:958 (X) - Add a note here as you did in 00:26:431 ok
00:51:695 (X) - Add a note here ok
02:25:651 (1,2,3,1,2,3,4,5,1,2,3,4,5,1,2,3,1,2,3,4,5,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2) - Not a good idea with the hitsounds I think..I see what you tried to achieve with the ride cymbal but doesn't sound/play very good, I would suggest you go with what you did with the rest of the map for this part too. Why this part was silenced, I never did that owo

Giorgos wrote:

suck my поршень

Vass_Bass wrote:

Ast's Normal
AR and OD -1? no
00:40:958 (1) - better with spacing and move that sliders to center no
01:38:589 (3,4) - remove claps from the start of the sliders k
01:43:642 (3) - clap in the end k
02:00:544 (2) - new combo? or don't stuck with (1) no

Raging Bull wrote:

Normal:
The settings have a rather big jump compared to easy. Perhaps lower everything (except circle) by 1 tick? eh no
00:01:326 (3,2) - Perhaps clean up the overlap? Maybe you could do something with the first 2 notes to make 3 blanket the slider better? no
Hmm well I guess nothing else bothered me

Astom wrote:

Raging Bull wrote:

Normal:
The settings have a rather big jump compared to easy. Perhaps lower everything (except circle) by 1 tick? eh no
00:01:326 (3,2) - Perhaps clean up the overlap? Maybe you could do something with the first 2 notes to make 3 blanket the slider better? no
Hmm well I guess nothing else bothered me

Raging Bull wrote:

All these are suggestions. If you disagree with them, please explain why.

Raging Bull wrote:

?

Astom wrote:

Raging Bull wrote:

Normal:
The settings have a rather big jump compared to easy. Perhaps lower everything (except circle) by 1 tick? eh no
00:01:326 (3,2) - Perhaps clean up the overlap? Maybe you could do something with the first 2 notes to make 3 blanket the slider better? no
Hmm well I guess nothing else bothered me

Raging Bull wrote:

All these are suggestions. If you disagree with them, please explain why.

Raging Bull wrote:

All these are suggestions. If you disagree with them, please explain why.

People don't need give explanations of why they don't do your suggestions

Raging Bull wrote:

Hard:
00:10:168 (1) - This kick slider sounds very loud since it echoes with every repeat. Perhaps lower the volume to around 30 would be better? ok, but 45% sounds better than 30%
00:17:431 (4) - The blanket looks rather weird since the repeat is partially blocked. Perhaps remapping 00:16:958 (3) and making it an arc instead of linear would be better so 4 wouldn't be restricted to mapping only to the left side. Then you can blanket better. ok
00:24:221 (1,2,3,4) - I'm not entirely sure about anti jumps with high AR on a hard diff. Perhaps spacing these would be better. Also, add finish on 4? Sounds better to me. It makes a nice effect and it's not confusing at all. (ok for the finish)
00:53:747 (4) - I'm not entirely sure what would a speed change do here besides making the repeat slider more visible. Perhaps just make it 1x? It fits the music D: And the repeat slider is visible o.o
00:57:537 (4,5) - Perhaps change these into a slider? The gap between these two seems odd since you can really hear the note being held. ok
02:19:650 (7) - Perhaps you could change this into a slider and make it end at 02:20:123? Then add a note at 02:20:439. I think this would be much better since there won't be an odd gap.

No it looks weird because I need something on 02:19:965.
02:21:544 (5,1) - Perhaps deleting these two notes would be good? They don't seem to follow anything imo, except for constant 1/2 beat. They follow the music, and if I remove them, it feels like something is missing
02:24:071 (1,2,3,4) - Space the anti jumps for the same reason I mentioned earlier? Nope ~
02:35:282 (2,3,4) - ^? ~
02:37:335 (3,5) - Maybe instead of 3 blanketing 5, you could make 5 blanket the 3's start? It might be more appealing since the reverse won't be partially blocked. It's not really a problem here since the player can see the repeat arrow because there is a circle between these sliders, and the pattern is nice as it is :3
02:39:861 (3,5) - ^?
02:53:124 (4,5) - Perhaps instead of a blanket here, maybe a cutting slider? The blanket was hardly noticeable to me because of how the blanket slider is overlapped by the "to be blanketted" slider. I didn't understand sorry ;_;
03:29:756 (1) - Extend by 1/2? ok

Byakugan249 wrote:

Kurai's Hard:
00:50:589(5) - NC Doesn't fit the song imo
01:01:010(6) - ^ ok
02:16:491(6) - ^ nope
02:22:807(5) - ^ nope
03:09:229(5) - ^ ok

KuraiPettan wrote:

Raging Bull wrote:

02:53:124 (4,5) - Perhaps instead of a blanket here, maybe a cutting slider? The blanket was hardly noticeable to me because of how the blanket slider is overlapped by the "to be blanketted" slider. I didn't understand sorry ;_;
ok

Thank you

Thanks

Byakugan249 wrote:

Ast's Normal:
02:18:070(4) - NC
03:18:387(5) - ^
03:22:808(5) - Stack it on the end of (3) at 03:22:177

1. General thoughts: I felt that having the kiai parts as the slowest ones makes no sense at all. It's the most epic part of the song where the players should feel it, and in this case it's the speed. While it's playable, it felt bad (on standard).
2. 00:02:268 (1) - This slider was little weird because there is nothing in the music for it's end. Instead of it, just make a circle at this timeline? Same goes for the similar upcoming slider 00:03:532 (1).
3. 01:13:321 (3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10) - This stream is too quiet. It's difficult to hit streams accurately if you can't hear how you hit the notes. Raise the volume. I tried 50% and it sounds good and it's audible enough to hear properly how fast you click.
4. 01:55:321 (2) - Clap?
5. 01:56:426 (3) - Clap at the end?
6. 02:20:900 (3) - ^
7. 02:25:953 (2) - I think you should use a normal finish here instead of a soft one, it has a much better impact. Since you used it at 02:27:216 (1) which is less important moment in the music (if you ask me), you should definitely use it here too.
8. 02:34:163 (3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10) - Same here, 35% is too low. You should raise it so the players know how fast they click the stream. I tried 50% and it sounds good and it's audible enough to hear properly how fast you click.
9. 02:51:058 (1,3) - Use finishes on the start of the both sliders? Sounds really good, especially cause you used it later in this section in the same way.
10. 03:02:900 (1) - Remove this finish, it sounds off because it's not a "heavy" note. Without it, it sounds better.
11. 03:07:795 (2) - ^
12. 03:13:005 (1) - ^
13. 03:21:058 (5) - New combo. It has awkward spacing and the antijump is nearly unreadable, new combo would help in reading this. Or just make it similar spacing to the previous notes (2.4x distance snap, while it has 1.1x currently).

1. 01:13:953 (1) - Add a finish maybe?
2. 01:23:742 (1) - I think this finish sounds better if you place it at the start of 01:24:058 (3) instead.
3. 01:34:163 (3) - Finish at the start? If you made the above change, this would bring consistency.
4. 02:03:058 (1) - Finish?
5. 02:05:111 - Maybe drag this break so it starts at 02:05:742? Feels nicer.
6. 03:07:479 (1) - Finish at the start?
7. 03:16:321 (1) - Finish. You used it later in this part on a similar section in this way.
8. 03:18:847 (10) - This one should be a new combo instead of the next one, fits the music better.
9. 03:21:373 (2) - New combo? So it looks more like the section before. An isolated combo on the slider before is okay imo.
10. 03:22:636 (1) - Remove this new combo? So it's consistent with the section before (03:17:584 (6,7) etc).
11. 03:23:900 (7) - This one should be a new combo instead of the next one, fits the music better.
12. 03:25:794 (7) - Finish? Sounds better considering you used finishes on the upcoming red ticks.

1. Difficulty settings: I feel that having AR6 and OD5 is too hard for a normal. Some hards use these settings already. The map is perfectly playable and readable with AR5, so you should drop AR to 5, and reduce OD to 4.
2. 00:53:111 (3) - This could be confusing. The music stops before the slider ends and you muted that part. Maybe some new guy will stop holding his button and will get a 100 just because the slider isn't following the music properly. I think that you should remove the repeat and just map a circle at the spot the music stops (because there is a drum hit there which this slider can't follow no matter what). This follows the music much better.

1. 00:09:374 (1) - I don't think that spinners like this belong in the easy diff. The slider coming after it comes kinda soon and is most likely to be missed because of a too low recovery time. Shortening it is risky because short spinners are just as bad. I suggest that you map a slider which starts where this spinner starts, and end it at 00:10:163. Fits the music nicely. In addition you could map a circle with a finish at 00:10:795.
2. 00:53:742 (5) - You should definitely end this slider at 00:54:216 instead of silencing it. Fits the music much better and is less confusing. A small remark: it's not symmetrical either, so you have to fix it anyway, if you care about symmetry that is. You can just make it look something like this. Don't forget to remove the silencing section afterwards.
3. 01:12:690 (1,2) - Claps at the end of the slider and on the circle? Sounds good.
4. 01:17:111 (3) - Sliders like these are too hard for the easy diff. New guys won't tell it's a double repeater anyway, so think of something else, like a longer normal slider. This affects all the sliders like this.
5. 02:48:058 (1,2,3) - 1 grid down to fix the spacing between 3 and the upcoming slider. Looks better too. Sorry for nazi but this is kinda obvious hehe.
6. 02:54:058 (3) - Clap at the start.

lolcubes wrote:

[Kurai's Hard]

1. 01:13:953 (1) - Add a finish maybe? ok
2. 01:23:742 (1) - I think this finish sounds better if you place it at the start of 01:24:058 (3) instead. ok
3. 01:34:163 (3) - Finish at the start? If you made the above change, this would bring consistency. ok
4. 02:03:058 (1) - Finish? I don't like :/
5. 02:05:111 - Maybe drag this break so it starts at 02:05:742? Feels nicer. ok
6. 03:07:479 (1) - Finish at the start? ok
7. 03:16:321 (1) - Finish. You used it later in this part on a similar section in this way. ok
8. 03:18:847 (10) - This one should be a new combo instead of the next one, fits the music better. ok
9. 03:21:373 (2) - New combo? So it looks more like the section before. An isolated combo on the slider before is okay imo. I don't like this idea because there is only 2 combo color, so it will look weird imo
10. 03:22:636 (1) - Remove this new combo? So it's consistent with the section before (03:17:584 (6,7) etc). ok
11. 03:23:900 (7) - This one should be a new combo instead of the next one, fits the music better. ok
12. 03:25:794 (7) - Finish? Sounds better considering you used finishes on the upcoming red ticks. ok

Gabi wrote:

Just so you know, that isn't Remilia in the background. It's just an original artwork (actually a vocaloid parody).

IMO the song deserves a Remilia background, but that's totally up to you i guess.

Just so you know, that isn't Remilia in the background. It's just an original artwork (actually a vocaloid parody).

Also, who is Remilia?, the BG is perfect :l

I haven't seen a vocaloid like that either, however the artist says it's some sort of vocaloid parody (or atleast that's what he tagged it like).

I thought like... people usually remap songs because previous maps are bad or old (or am I wrong?), why did you take a song that has already been mapped and made it worse D:

Just tell me please if you have changed it, so I will change the Taiko BG, too. But to be honest, personaly I like the BG which is used right now. It dose also fit into the song.

So it's not about making a good map, it's about trolling, right?

Natteke wrote:

I thought like... people usually remap songs because previous maps are bad or old (or am I wrong?), why did you take a song that has already been mapped and made it worse D:

Tick rate 2 fits this better

02:25:637 (1) - Eh, pretty soon after a spinner and on a red tick.. I'd just delete it.

The spastic slider speed changes were really weird to play and didn't feel that intuitive.

03:31:163 - Set this timing section to soft so you don't get that little pop sound that the normal set likes to do at low volume

Garven wrote:

[Hard]
AR -2 AR6 is too slooow, Only AR-1.
01:17:111 (5) - This repeat is fairly covered when in peppy sliders. Rearrange things please. Done
01:19:637 (5) - ^
01:32:268 (4,5) - 5's rhythm is strange after doing that triplet rhythm since there's nothing really stressing that point. Done
01:45:611 - Break for 10 seconds, play for 10 seconds, break for 10 seconds zzz They are needed, besides if I map this break, the diff will have ~13 000 000 max score, which is very close from Lunatic's max score D:
02:37:952 (5) - Same as earlier Done
02:40:479 (5) - ^

Mm, it was more of a commentary of the pacing of your break usage.The other difficulties managed to have around a 20 second span of play time (working from memory here). You can have the same length of break time - it's just the points in which you chose to use the breaks that I was put off by.

IceBeam wrote:

[Kurai's Hard]
00:24:216 (1,2,3) - a bit nazi,but wouldn't soft hitsounds be better for these notes? done
00:42:374 (1) - shouldn't it start 1/2 earlier? or then add a note to 00:42:216 before a spinner? done
01:33:847 (1) - stack under (5) properly? D: done
01:55:479 (1) - it doesn't really cause any problems with reading the spacing,but flipping horizontally looks/plays better imo Done °A°